One Example Of The Barbarism Of Corporatocracy

Sticky – 3 links: 1. Money flows uphill, 2. Haiti Relief And Reconstruction Watch, 3. Save Our Net / See below this sticky for new content

Money flows uphill: An update from Cité Soleil | rabble.ca. by Paul Jackson & Joegodson Deralcine

Here’s an excerpt from the above linked-to article:

“Enter the foreign NGOs. The Haitian oligarchy has absolutely no interest in the poor once they leave the sweatshops. However, they don’t mind if a bunch of humanitarian suckers want to come to the island and immunize a few. Build a hospital, a school, feed them if you feel like it. Anyone with a few dollars in his pocket is welcome into Haiti to do whatever he likes as long as it doesn’t interfere with the wage or working conditions. You can’t get near that. No NGO that wants to remain in business is able to say this.”

And here’s an excerpt from my online response to the above linked-to article:

“When Canada, France and the U.S. attacked Haiti, I determined to not forget it, which I wasn’t going to do of course. But who can keep focussed on all of the corporatocracy’s atrocities from year to year? So, While you don’t uncaringly forget about things like the corporatocracy’s invasion of a small, defenceless nation like Haiti, you do find yourself distracted continuously [by] each new, successive atrocity and it all blurs. I just didn’t want that to happen with Haiti. And so I [focussed] on it as best I could.

“That hasn’t involved much more than paying attention to articles on alternative media websites like rabble, and giving myself the task of reading up on the subject, but I felt that that was better than nothing at all. I urge others out there to do that minimum as well. Then mention Haiti as an example of imperialism, with Canada right in the middle of it, when you’re talking to people you know. Because people should know about the ‘myth’ of Canada, that supposedly nicer, more civilized country north of America.”

+

+

Coffee! I do not have a dedicated blog about coffee. I don’t yet blog frequently enough for that, I feel. As well, I don’t consider myself expert enough. I know that that doesn’t necessarily matter if the blog is done half decently. But that’s how I feel. In lieu of such a blog, I have my coffee posts scattered throughout this blog and easily available to you. To find them, click on the link at the bottom of the coffee post you read that says “Explore posts in the same categories.” That’s poorly expressed, but you get the idea. It ought to say “Explore other posts in this category.” But WP isn’t immune from the plague of illiteracy sweeping the planet.

+

Disappeared! Going forward, I will more closely track interactive sites where I post commentary and the post doesn’t get accepted. I never submit commentary that is unacceptable to reasonable, decent people. The politics I espouse and talk about may offend many, but that’s different. Also, It’s one thing when a nasty organization disappears my posts. But it’s another thing altogether when an organization that I consider useful and on the side of ‘the people’ disappears my posts. Then again, Gatekeepers are everywhere (hint: Click on the word ‘gatekeeper’ in the tag cloud). Click on the word ‘censored’ in the tag cloud to see posts that I submit to various discussions but which never appeared or appeared and then disappeared. I won’t always know why my posts are disappeared. But so what? Let’s see what’s going on out there. Right?

+

Posted in General, Urgent | Tagged , , ,

Yep. Official Terrorism Is Crazy. Why So Much Official Terrorism?

Chris Hedges and Glenn Greenwald

Chris Hedges and Glenn Greenwald

The Same Motive for Anti-US 'Terrorism' Is Cited Over and Over | Common Dreams.

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

******************
News reports purporting to describe what Dzhokhar Tsarnaev told US interrogators should, for several reasons, be taken with a huge grain of salt. The sources for this information are anonymous, they work for the US government, the statements were obtained with no lawyer present and no Miranda warnings given, and Tsarnaev is “grievously wounded”, presumably quite medicated, and barely able to speak. That the motives for these attacks are still unclear has been acknowledged…

In the last several years, there have been four other serious attempted or successful attacks on US soil by Muslims, and in every case, they emphatically all say the same thing: that they were motivated by the continuous, horrific violence brought by the US and its allies to the Muslim world – violence which routinely kills and oppresses innocent men, women and children…

It should go without saying that the issue here is causation, not justification or even fault. It is inherently unjustifiable to target innocent civilians with violence, no matter the cause (just as it is unjustifiable to recklessly kill civilians with violence). But it is nonetheless vital to understand why there are so many people who want to attack the US as opposed to, say, Peru, or South Africa, or Brazil, or Mexico, or Japan, or Portugal. It’s vital for two separate reasons.

First, some leading American opinion-makers love to delude themselves and mislead others into believing that the US is attacked despite the fact that it is peaceful, peace-loving, freedom-giving and innocent. As these myth-makers would have it, we don’t bother anyone; we just mind our own business (except when we’re helping and liberating everyone), so why would anyone possibly want to attack us?…

Second, it’s crucial to understand this causation because it’s often asked “what can we do to stop Terrorism?” The answer is right in front of our faces: we could stop embracing the polices in that part of the world which fuel anti-American hatred and trigger the desire for vengeance and return violence…

There seems to be this pervasive belief in the US that we can invade, bomb, drone, kill, occupy, and tyrannize whomever we want, and that they will never respond. That isn’t how human affairs function and it never has been. If you believe all that militarism and aggression are justified, then fine: make that argument. But don’t walk around acting surprised and bewildered and confounded (why do they hate us??) when violence is brought to US soil as well. It’s the inevitable outcome of these choices, and that’s not because Islam is some sort of bizarre or intrinsically violent and uncivilized religion. It’s because no group in the world is willing to sit by and be targeted with violence and aggression of that sort without also engaging in it (just look at the massive and ongoing violence unleashed by the US in response to a single one-day attack on its soil 12 years ago: imagine how Americans would react to a series of relentless attacks over the course of more than a decade, to say nothing of having their children put in prison indefinitely with no charges, tortured, kidnapped, and otherwise brutalized).
****************

“For mere oppression may make a wise one act crazy, and a gift can destroy the heart.” – King Solomon, at Ecclesiastes 7:7 in the Christian Bible

“Anger and a sense of betrayal: these are what Ernest Logan Bell and tens of millions of other disenfranchised workers express. These emotions spring from the failure of the liberal class over the past three decades to protect the minimal interests of the working and middle class as corporations dismantled the democratic state, decimated the manufacturing sector, looted the U.S. Treasury, waged imperial wars that can neither be afforded nor won, and gutted basic laws that protected the interests of ordinary citizens. Yet the liberal class continues to speak in the prim and obsolete language of policies and issues. It refuses to defy the corporate assault. A virulent right wing, for this reason, captures and expresses the legitimate rage articulated by the disenfranchised. And the liberal class has become obsolete even as it clings to its positions of privilege within liberal institutions.” -page 7 of “Death Of The Liberal Class,” by Chris Hedges (2010)

The madness, daily, acquires bodies, bulking up nonstop, like an evil, raging, destructive black Hulk.

Ernest Logan Bell (left)

Ernest Logan Bell (left)

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gord Nixon: Here’s Another Good PR Move You Can Make

SG Home Page banner and partial page

Temporary foreign workers = permanent public opinion problem » StraightGoods.ca.

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

***************
RBC’s turn in the media glare followed the uproar last year involving a firm controlled by investors in China that imported 201 workers from China for a coal mine it’s developing in British Columbia.

On the top floor of a downtown office tower, bank leaders can get isolated from public opinion. The Canadian Bankers’ Association thumped its chest last year when its annual poll showed “86 percent of Canadians have a favourable impression of banks in Canada, up from only 59 percent in 2001.”

But while Canadians like their banks, they don’t like bankers, who are among the least respected professionals around. According to a 2012 Angus Reid Public Opinion study, 55 percent of us have a “great deal” or “fair amount” of respect for bankers, putting them 22nd in a list of 25. At the top, nurses and doctors (96 percent respect them); at the bottom, politicians (27 percent) and car salesmen (26 percent).

Those bank fees and towering salaries don’t help the bankers when they step into public relations quicksand. RBC’s Gord Nixon got $12.6 million last year, a 25 percent increase over the previous year. Probably Nixon was caught off-guard by public outrage because downsizing, offshoring and outsourcing are everyday corporate behaviours.
***************

My typo-corrected online response to the above linked-to article follows:

***************
I’ve always hated those ‘in your face’ [bank] ads asking you to tell them what a great job they’re doing. There’s nothing subtle about them either and thinking people know exactly what’s up. They, the banks’ top officials, just want to put the public in it’s place. They want to be able to tell the public – while their political allies protect them and ignore their transgressions – that they are doing a great job because “There’s the public telling us we’re doing a great job.” Try getting a bank, or any special capitalist interest, to play nice when it can just… brush you off with “What do you mean? Look at that [statistic].”

I’m still amazed though. Darkness is it’s own reward. When powerful, rich people are reduced to playing such a game, What does it say about their quality? I mean, ‘That’ is what they do with their incredible power and freedom? They think up scammy little scams like ads and polls that they can then turn around and shove in our faces so that they can more easily – How easy do you need it to be? – do what [their political] allies allow and encourage them to do? Those are wasted minds. And ‘wasted’ perfectly describes how they are working when they dream up this crap.

Solutions flow from caring. Problems flow from not caring. Too many people [do not care] about how they survive. Too many people, including victims of corporatocracy, are playing the losing game of ‘riches for the strongest’. A game of life that ensures that there will be losers isn’t wise. It’s a product of darkness.

If the people are stung enough by this lack of care by the corporatotocracy to do something about it (What exactly?), Does that mean that the people being stung now care? Because good solutions won’t come from people squawking solely because they’ve been personally affected by the bad behavior of others who don’t care. That’s not caring. That’s just being wounded, even if it causes a single problem to get some attention and can lead to it getting fixed. So far, We’ve had ‘proper’ verbal responses from RBC and Stephen ‘I’m having too much fun’ Harper. Those aren’t even a solution to the foreign worker program [problem]. Actually, Given the way these politicians deal with problems (for Canadians), We may REALLY dislike what they finally do to fix them. Which is why none of this hand-wringing over a scammy, tax evading bank is terribly useful.

We need to completely destroy corporatocracy. It’s not going to destroy itself. ‘We’ need to. ‘One’ can.

*What a crap website! Come on guys. Besides being butt ugly (Don’t do an RBC “But our readers like it” on me either.), I can’t even copy the text I enter into this field. Sometimes I want to blog about something and will copy my post. Sometimes my post is ‘disappeared’ and that makes me angry. If I’m passionate enough about the subject and if I’ve spent some time composing my comment and it disappears (sometimes in forums attached to ‘progressive’ orgs), I will do up my blog post and include my disappeared [comment] because I think it’s illuminating. ‘Have a look at what they didn’t like me writing’ is my thrust. I expanded this field/box in order to screen capture the region with my comment [in it] and the corner disappeared under your side bar on the right!!! I can’t afford to donate to SG or any org. But I’m sure others can and do. Is this what you give them for their trouble? Is this necessary? Who has the time for this?!
*****************

*edit, April 20, 2013 – I stand by what I said in my above post, although I see that copying my comment is easily enough accomplished once I’ve submitted it. It doesn’t disappear before being moderated for or against and in that form it’s able to be copied.

Gord: I have a suggestion for you. Make a public pledge that RBC will quit asking customers for their feedback. Obviously, Welcome – with good intentions and in a tasteful way – feedback from your customers. But welcoming feedback politely and constantly getting in customers’ faces to, essentially, insist that they tell you how great you are (because you, in fact, think they are so great that they should be abused) are two different things.

related blog posts: Are Immigrants Solely Responsible For Jobs Being Lost To Canada-Born Workers? part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6

Gordon Nixon

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can These Fascists Talk Around A Problem Or What?!!

R.E.M. from Fall On Me video

Debate: After Activists Covertly Expose Animal Cruelty, Should They Be Targeted With “Ag-Gag” Laws? | Democracy Now!

If we can’t pay attention to both what they’re saying and what they’re doing, then fascists will finish the job of making the hell that is this world as hot as it can be in no time at all.

Please watch the Democracy Now segment which I link to here. And be outraged. But don’t watch it just to be disgusted and angered, for those are emotions that will, unchecked, only serve elites by causing us to be distracted and unfocussed. This response – using captured governments to criminalize whistle-blowing and legalize crime – by the corporatocracy to exposure of big ag’s disgusting practices – aided and abetted, I’m sorry to report, by a large swathe of the 99% who don’t care enough about how they survive – highlights the main features of the corporatocracy, the cancer on mankind and our liveable earth that has fairly devoured everything.

Here’s ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), an unaccountable organization that corporations and special interests use to make laws that they then use their pull with legislators to enact, bypassing any sort of forums that may include the voices of (all of) those affected by the proposed laws, coming to the rescue of big ag (not America’s small family farms), allowing it to continue to do it’s cruel business as usual by essentially criminalizing the activists who are only doing what governments would do if they were actually by and of the people, namely regulate. In the absence of proper regulation of agribusiness in the area of meat and poultry production, the public depends on brave activists, and whistle-blowers in the pertinent industries, to let us know when something’s wrong. But when neoliberals say that they don’t want regulation (unless it’s regulation of those who complain about deregulation), they mean it, as we see. And so, You get obscenities such as Senate Bill 648, which (employment application fraud bill) is designed to enforce the corporatocracy’s law against regulation of itself. It was only days ago that something similar happened when the act dubbed the Monsanto Protection Act was approved by president Obama.

From the employment fraud law, which Orwell would understand perfectly.

From the employment fraud law, which Orwell would understand perfectly.

I will present, below, excerpts from the transcript from the DN video linked to at the top of the post. I guess I should warn you: You will find some footage to be quite disturbing. If you don’t like seeing gratuitous cruelty toward animals – a pitchfork to a cow’s head and gut and legs, a cow beaten with a bar after having it’s nose chained to a post, birds kicked and so on – then just listen to the video. Don’t watch it. I can offer a few screen shots, but they are nowhere near as graphic as the video from which I’ve taken them.

"You are from your father the Devil and you wish to satisfy his desires [to inflict pain and cause anger and confusion]." - John 8:44

“You are from your father the Devil and you wish to satisfy his desires [to inflict pain and cause anger and confusion].” – John 8:44

Maybe if he kicks this cow's head in, the cow will figure out what it is it's supposed to do. Besides become this creep's next yummy grease and salt fix.

Maybe if he kicks this cow’s head in, the cow will figure out what it is it’s supposed to do. Besides become this creep’s next yummy grease and salt fix.

Here’s what mafia capitalism means. And here’s what spiritual failure and the selling of one’s soul looks like. It’s not a pretty sight. Indeed, It’s as ugly as any of the images of sickos torturing, for pleasure, animals in their care that investigators like Will Potter has recorded.

******************************************************
So-called “ag-gag” bills that criminalize undercover filming on farms and at slaughterhouses to document criminal animal abuse are sweeping the country. Five states, including Missouri, Utah and Iowa, already have such laws in place. North Carolina has just become the latest state to consider such a law, joining a list that includes Arkansas, California, Indiana, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont. Many of these bills have been introduced with the backing of the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, a mechanism for corporate lobbyists to help write state laws…

AMY GOODMAN: For a discussion on these so-called ag-gag laws, we’re joined by two guests. Will Potter, freelance reporter who’s been covering the bills and ALEC for years, the American Legislative Exchange Council, he runs the blog GreenIsTheNewRed.com. He’s also the author of Green is the New Red: An Insider’s Account of a Social Movement Under Siege. And we’re joined by Emily Meredith, the communications director for the Animal Agriculture Alliance…

EMILY MEREDITH: Sure. Well, the Animal Agriculture Alliance is the largest national coalition of individual farmers and ranchers, veterinarians, processing facilities and a host of national organizations representing basically every protein group. And we work to make sure that there’s a unified voice communicating and engaging with consumers and helping them understand where their food comes from.

And this farm protection legislation, which has been termed ag-gag legislation by the activist community, is extremely important because these undercover videos are harmful to the farm owners where these videos are taped, the farm families that work those farms day in and day out, and the animal agriculture industry truly as a whole. And these videos damage their reputations. They bring harsh criticism. And many of these videos have found no legitimate instances of abuse, but rather use manipulated footage. They show false narrative of the images that are being shown. And they’re meant to shock and awe consumers and to really highlight conduct that the animal activist groups want to put an end to the entire industry. They want to end the animal agriculture industry. And that’s what these videos are about. And that’s why legislation like this is so important. It is because this legislation is meant to protect the right of these people to continue to operate their farms and ranches and to continue to provide food to this hungry country and the world.

AARON MATÉ: Will Potter, you’ve covered this issue extensively. Your thoughts on what are called the ag-gag laws or farm protection laws?

WILL POTTER: Well, there is certainly a lot of truth to what you just said. I mean, these undercover investigations have created a lot of distrust with the industry and really questioned where people are getting their meat and animal products from. It’s important to point out, though, that these investigations have also led to criminal charges across the country. They’ve led to the largest meat recall in U.S. history. They’ve led to ballot initiatives across the country in which consumers are speaking out.

And to frame this as something by animal welfare groups who are seeking to abolish animal agriculture is just disingenuous. The people that are opposed to these bills are people like the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, the Teamsters, the AFL-CIO, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Press Photographers Association. These are not radical extremist animal rights activists; these are everyone who cares about where their food comes from and whether or not they have a right to know about what they’re buying.

AMY GOODMAN: Emily Meredith, your response?

EMILY MEREDITH: Well, I would say that these videos are-they’re showing families, they’re showing farms and slaughterhouses, and they’re basically making them guilty without ever giving them the opportunity to address the allegations that are levied in those videos. They’re not giving them the opportunity to take corrective action. I know that Pete mentioned that they often turn the videos over to the authorities. That is completely-I think that’s disingenuous, when in fact they actually release these videos direct to the media. They send them direct to companies. One of the farms where-that Pete mentioned, they sent the video direct to CNN and to Burger King. And it was in fact the farm owners that turned that footage over to the state prosecutor and took responsibility, fired five of his employees, at least five of his employees, and turned that footage over. And I think that’s-that’s disingenuous.

If you truly care about animal welfare, you’re not going to wait even a minute to report animal abuse. You’re going to see it, you’re going to stop it, and you’re going to say something…

WILL POTTER: I think it’s interesting to say something like the activists are making people who abuse animals and are facing felony animal cruelty charges, in many cases, making them guilty. I mean, it completely restructures the debate away from the people who are actually committing the abuses.

And I think it’s important to point out also that we can’t limit this discussion to what’s being described as criminal activity. Although these investigations have certainly led to criminal charges across the country, much of what these investigators are documenting are actually standard industry practices…

AARON MATÉ: Emily, does the industry have safeguards in place that you think counter what Will is saying is needed, which is people investigating and doing monitoring of these farms?

EMILY MEREDITH: Oh, for sure. I mean, I think the last thing that the industry needs is activist groups that really wish to see a vegan world, quote-unquote, “policing” them…

AMY GOODMAN: Will Potter, what about Emily Meredith’s points that the vast majority of farms are family farms and that they successfully monitor themselves?

WILL POTTER: It’s completely nonexistent. Old MacDonald’s farm just does not exist anymore. We’re talking about nine to 10 billion animals raised for food every year. These are not little red barns dotting the countryside. These are industrial operations, in some cases with a million birds on a single farm…

AMY GOODMAN: And a point that Emily Meredith made about if you see abuse, if you do get in there and you do film it, you should have to turn the film over within 24 hours, what is your response to that, Will Potter?

WILL POTTER: I think there are a couple things to point out. One is that this doesn’t allow for a systemic or a multi-abuse pattern to be exposed. For instance, no one would go to the FBI or to the police and say that they should bust the mob after catching one illegal activity. And I think that’s really the same situation here. Do we want to see one aberrant behavior, or do we want to see what is happening every single day on these farms to get a complete picture of what’s happening and how our food is being processed?…

AMY GOODMAN: Where does ALEC fit into this picture, this organization where corporate heads and legislators get together and write legislation?

WILL POTTER: So, I think most of your listeners are familiar with ALEC, because Democracy Now! has reported on it quite a bit. But the way the group functions is by taking thousands of dollars of donations from corporations, and in exchange for that money, these corporations are allowed to draft model legislation. And these model bills are introduced around the country without any fingerprints tying them to the industries that crafted or are attempting to craft the law, so most people have no idea where these bills are actually coming from. Meanwhile, ALEC mobilizes lawmakers around the country. For instance, in Utah, my reporting on the ag-gag bill there showed that the Senate, as it-the Utah Senate that passed the bill, over half of the supporting votes came from ALEC members. I mean, we really have no idea of the true scope of this organization, but it’s clear, especially with this wave of ag-gag bills, that ALEC bills has been a driving force behind these attempts to criminalize activists.
******************************************************************

Especially revealing is the way that power-talker Emily completely ignored Amy’s question about ALEC’s involvement. As I said, Pay attention to what she says. She very speaks very powerfully (physically), conveying the impression that she’s up to speed, believes in her cause and is on a righteous mission. But she hardly makes sense. She doesn’t want activists to pause when they discover wrongdoing, but she does! Other things she says are just laughable, such as when she states, essentially, that there is no large-scale industrial farming going on, but only small family-owned farms everywhere that she, and her partners, care soooo much about.

Notice, also, how she launches the transparent ploy of demonizing the animal rights activists so as to scare off the rest of us who might not fully agree with all the positions of all the activists. Aaron Maté asked Emily whether the industry has “safeguards in place that you think counter what Will is saying is needed, which is people investigating and doing monitoring of these farms?” She responded with “Oh, for sure. I mean, I think the last thing that the industry needs is activist groups that really wish to see a vegan world, quote-unquote, “policing” them.” Potter said it best though: “And to frame this as something by animal welfare groups who are seeking to abolish animal agriculture is just disingenuous. The people that are opposed to these bills are people like the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, the Teamsters, the AFL-CIO, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Press Photographers Association. These are not radical extremist animal rights activists; these are everyone who cares about where their food comes from and whether or not they have a right to know about what they’re buying.”

Fascism, setting aside complicated, overly involved definitions, obtains when the political class and the capitalist class join forces, consciously, in order to run the country (or world) free from input from anyone else. The majority is cut out of decision-making and given fake democracy and undemocratic, elite-serving electoral politics to enable it to believe, if it is willing, that if people can vote, then they have democracy and therefore don’t have to look for it. Undemocratic electoral politics include parties and politicians that are one way or another pro-corporatocracy. Politicians who listen to the people are kept out and if they still get into the political arena, they are marginalized, primarily by being vastly outnumbered. Regular voters are therefore presented with corporatocracy-approved parties and candidates. No matter who gets elected, no matter which party forms government, the neoliberal, anti-people, anti-green system is perpetuated. That whole system very much depends on a sophisticated propaganda system that is able to manufacture consent that is in conformity with an ideology that, while it possesses no true coherence, nevertheless serves elites and special capitalist interests. ALEC is a purely fascist organization.

> Fascism Watch from the Third World Traveler website

> ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) Exposed

from the website:

** ALEC is not a lobby; it is not a front group. It is much more powerful than that. Through ALEC, behind closed doors, corporations hand state legislators the changes to the law they desire that directly benefit their bottom line. Along with legislators, corporations have membership in ALEC. Corporations sit on all nine ALEC task forces and vote with legislators to approve “model” bills. They have their own corporate governing board which meets jointly with the legislative board. (ALEC says that corporations do not vote on the board.) Corporations fund almost all of ALEC’s operations. Participating legislators, overwhelmingly conservative Republicans, then bring those proposals home and introduce them in statehouses across the land as their own brilliant ideas and important public policy innovations—without disclosing that corporations crafted and voted on the bills. ALEC boasts that it has over 1,000 of these bills introduced by legislative members every year, with one in every five of them enacted into law. ALEC describes itself as a “unique,” “unparalleled” and “unmatched” organization. We agree. It is as if a state legislature had been reconstituted, yet corporations had pushed the people out the door. **

> “Speaking on the condition we conceal his identity, “Pete” has secretly captured animal abuse on farms and slaughterhouses after applying to work at the location.” – Democracy Now

> State Policy Network / SPN (an ALEC-connected program of and by and for the elite)

> GreenIsTheNewRed – The blog of Will Potter, activist and writer and author of the book “Green Is The New Red.” Remember how the rightwingers used to claim to be protecting everyone from the commies, or reds? (Indeed; Kirkus Book Reviews notes that “In this hard-hitting debut, journalist Potter likens the Justice Department targeting of environmentalists today to McCarthyism in the 1950s… A shocking exposé of judicial overreach.” See that full review here: “Green Is The New Red – An Insider’s Account Of A Social Movement Under Siege” by Will Potter) It’s not hard to remember. They still do it, although it’s not alone among bogeyman that our fascist leaders need for propaganda purposes. They will now protect us from terrorists as well, and not just Al Qaeda, as the above linked-to Democracy episode attests.

> “Taping of Farm Cruelty Is Becoming the Crime” by Richard A. Oppel Jr., New York Times

> “Remembering Fascism: Learning from the Past,” by Noam Chomsky

An excerpt from Chomsky’s above linked-to article on TruthDig follows:

***********
Reading Joe Stack’s manifesto and a great deal more like it, I find myself recovering childhood memories and much more that I did not then understand. The Weimar Republic was the peak of western civilization in the sciences and the arts, also regarded as a model of democracy. Through the 1920s, the traditional liberal and conservative parties entered into inexorable decline, well before the process was intensified by the Great Depression. The coalition that elected General Hindenburg in 1925 was not very different from the mass base that swept Hitler into office eight years later, compelling the aristocratic Hindenburg to select as chancellor the “little corporal” he despised. As late as 1928, the Nazis had less than 3 percent of the vote. Two years later, the most respectable Berlin press was lamenting the sight of the many millions in this “highly civilized country” who had “given their vote to the commonest, hollowest and crudest charlatanism.” The public was becoming disgusted with the incessant wrangling of Weimar politics, the service of the traditional parties to powerful interests and their failure to deal with popular grievances. They were drawn to forces dedicated to upholding the greatness of the nation and defending it against invented threats in a revitalized, armed and unified state, marching to a glorious future, led by the charismatic figure who was carrying out “the will of eternal Providence, the Creator of the universe,” as he orated to the mesmerized masses. By May 1933, the Nazis had largely destroyed not only the traditional ruling parties, but even the huge working-class parties, the Social Democrats and Communists, along with their very powerful associations. The Nazis declared May Day 1933 to be a workers holiday, something the left parties had never been able to achieve. Many working people took part in the enormous patriotic demonstrations, with more than a million people at the heart of Red Berlin, joining farmers, artisans, shopkeepers, paramilitary forces, Christian organizations, athletic and riflery clubs, and the rest of the coalition that was taking shape as the center collapsed. By the onset of the war, perhaps 90 percent of Germans were marching with the brown shirts.

As I mentioned, I am just old enough to remember those chilling and ominous days of Germany’s descent from decency to Nazi barbarism, to borrow the words of the distinguished scholar of German history Fritz Stern. He tells us that he has the future of the United States in mind when he reviews “a historic process in which resentment against a disenchanted secular world found deliverance in the ecstatic escape of unreason.”

The world is too complex for history to repeat, but there are nevertheless lessons to keep in mind. There is no shortage of tasks for those who choose the vocation of critical intellectuals, whatever their station in life. They can seek to sweep away the mists of carefully contrived illusion and reveal the stark reality. They can become directly engaged in popular struggles, helping to organize the countless Joe Stacks who are destroying themselves and maybe the world and to join them in leading the way the way to a better future.
*********

> Joseph Andrew Stack’s suicide ‘essay’ can be examined (so far) at this website address: “Joe Stack STATEMENT: Alleged Suicide Note From Austin Pilot Posted Online”

Joseph Andrew Stack

Joseph Andrew Stack

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Demonstration Thinking And Behavior

"You really have to keep the taxes down."  image: http://bit.ly/108UOqC + article: http://huff.to/fjv28x

“You really have to keep the taxes down.” image: http://bit.ly/108UOqC + article: http://huff.to/fjv28x

How the Media’s Experts Became Better Than You – Truthdig.

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

*********************
The job of corporate news pundits is to appear to say true and important things without attaching those views to themselves or their employers—to phrase every claim in the contingent form—writes Thomas Frank in the April issue of Harper’s Magazine…

Frank was a high school debater in the early 1980s. “We talked that way all the time,” he writes. “Arguments were what allowed us to keep score,” but they were a game—“a game for teenagers. … The point wasn’t for an individual debater to believe any particular argument and win the room over with the radiance of his faith; it was for him to be able to argue anything. Insincerity was essential.”
**********************

My (typo-corrected) online response to the above linked-to article follows:

**********************
Very interesting!

It meshes with something I’ve observed. A concept I’ve formulated is called ‘demonstration thinking and behavior’. I also refer to it as ‘horizontal thinking and behavior’. We know that politicians lie, but it’s not always obvious. Those who are not politicized, who think they know what’s going on in the world because they watch CNN or the CBC, are more likely to believe politicians’ lies. Those who are politicized and possess independence (which leads them to view with skepticism corporatocracy propaganda) see the lies, but find them astonishing. To them it looks like politicians’ believe their own lies. Even Noam Chomsky finds it amazing how apologists for… corporatism can embrace the cognitive dissonance on display.

But really, We all make choices. I’m sure a ‘survivor’ in the game of ‘riches for the strongest’, who has no problem with whatever rules he or she breaks as they wander about on that wide and spacious (rule-free) and dark road to destruction could pick up the manner, adopt the mode and navigate around. I’m also sure that one could make a conscious decision to survive, not by paying attention to how (which is restricting and ties you to rules) it’s done, but by paying attention to what those with power want from you or are willing to buy from you.

Certainly many political (formally in and out of politics) leaders have made that ethical journey and are among those who sit before… us today, on the boob tube, a dark channel of corporatocracy light, lying as [though] they believed it, so as to demonstrate for the bewildered herd (much of which ‘is’ bewildered, but which some don’t care about) exactly how their cowboy leaders want them to think and behave.

Elections furnish probably the best examples of demonstration thinking and behavior. We are not to think about the issues. We are to think about who’s hair looks the best or who we might like most to sit and have a beer with. And so on…

It’s no wonder secrecy has become so important to elites, their tools and allies. If we could know every deliberation that CEOs and their allies were making behind very closed doors, before their ‘decrees’ become drone murders, that would be like a big black board with white letters on it showing the message: “We are the fascists, the corporatists, the people who matter, running your world because you chose to be sheep and swallowed the law and order rhetoric, not realizing that law and order is for the masters of the world who, through wolfish aggression, will break whatever rules allow them to dominate over and control you. You deserve this fate. And you will not escape it.”

Hopefully such a message would jog people.
*****************************

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“How Noam Chomsky Is Discussed”

Chomsky

How Noam Chomsky Is Discussed | Common Dreams.

We won’t have Noam with us much longer. And he will be missed by many, hopefully by most. Boy did he speak truth to power!

Glenn Greenwald does the same and it’s fitting that Glenn looks closely at how his friend Noam is regarded by the establishment. I first discovered Noam when reading a Toronto Star article that reviewed his then recent book “Deterring Democracy.” I am religious. At the time, I simplistically thought that Noam’s book would give me ammunition for my argument that democracy is wrong and theocracy is right. I’m still religious, but I have the ability to think for myself and have changed my mind about a number of things, including democracy. While I don’t see it the same way as most do, I don’t see it as being wrong. I see a form of democracy as belonging within theocracy. And I don’t believe in a manmade theocracy, a contradiction in terms actually.

Noam doesn’t believe in God. He told me  that if he can’t see and measure something, then he doesn’t believe in it. (I don’t have his letter in front of me, so I’m going to paraphrase. That letter was a reply to my letter to him. I’ll copy it to this post later.) But it’s one thing to be unable to measure something and quite another to be uninterested in measuring something. I can’t see Chomsky’s mind, but I  can ‘measure’ it. Which is to say, I can see it in what it produces. The same thing goes for God.

Chomsky’s mind is certainly something I want to ‘measure’ and all those of good will should also want to ‘measure’ it.

The following is an excerpt from the above linked-to article:

** One very common tactic for enforcing political orthodoxies is to malign the character, “style” and even mental health of those who challenge them…

Nobody has been subjected to these vapid discrediting techniques more than Noam Chomsky. The book on which I’m currently working explores how establishment media systems restrict the range of acceptable debate in US political discourse, and I’m using Chomsky’s treatment by (and ultimate exclusion from) establishment US media outlets as a window for understanding how that works. **

I don’t really have anything to add to Glenn’s article. But I did toss in a couple of comments. I also got into a bit of a discussion (attached to this article) with another participant, which I won’t get into. Chomsky’s thoughts on the assassination of JFK, and other matters, came up for discussion.

Chomsky himself, in the above letter to myself, directed me to his book “Rethinking Camelot,” which I found interesting and informative. It’s been a while since I read it, but, as I told my online friend, I seem to recall that Noam isn’t overly concerned with exactly who killed Kennedy, which he feels that no one can know (in full, perfect detail), but with the utility to elites of the myth of Camelot that they and the entire establishment, including the corporate owned media, created and purvey.

My two online comments in response to the top of post-linked article follows:

*************************

“..one wonders whether he has ever changed even a single thing in his 60 years of political work.” That attitude; It’s almost endearing, from the standpoint of a denizen of this manmade hell called Earth, how the Right postures in this manner. What Rightists report (about others’ thoughts etc) in instances like this, is actually what they report to us about how they think and feel. The cue (Ellsberg, Chomsky etc) doesn’t matter. If you re-word the above statement, it could look like: “You will change things over my dead body.”

Chomsky et al, are not the problem, clearly. Terrorists in the guise of democrats (liberals I guess), professionals and truthtelling journalists who fearlessly confront and speak truth to power are the problem. We are all like Palestinians (which isn’t to say that Palestinians aren’t suffering much more than many of us who wish them well). We can be perfectly peaceful, as requested, required, demanded etc, and expect to be attacked – because our destruction is all that macho players in the great Darwinian game of ‘riches for the strongest’, in which there must be losers, seek. Or we can try to defend ourselves, committing the mortal sin of self defence (a phrase Chomsky used in connection with Nicaraguans facing American-backed death squads) by attempting to meet force with force – and get attacked by an implacable, malevolent enemy who is much more powerful than we are.

The terrorists, in the supreme perversion that darkness presents to the world, have launched a war against all of mankind (even themselves, ultimately), and the liveable earth itself, that they call “the war on terrorism.” They have launched a war against righteousness, love, sanity and life. They tell (all of) us that we are the terrorists and any disagreement we have with their violence, especially if it’s matched by seemingly real, or real, deeds, will be met with the greatest (unrestrained by principles or moral codes) force.

They have been at that for a while now. Have they forgotten that what they are doing, in effect, is shouting at God to show himself and do something about it if he’s real?

+

“This year, Good Friday happened to fall on the anniversary of Paul Revere’s ride. Seeing that date on the front page of the [Palm Beach] Post made me think of the colonial silversmith racing his horse through the dark streets of New England towns, waving his hat and shouting, “The British are coming!” Revere had risked his life to spread the word, and loyal Americans responded. They stopped the empire, back then.

“I wondered what had motivated them, why those colonial Americans were willing to step out of line. Many of the ringleaders had been prosperous. What had inspired them to risk their businesses, to bite the hand that fed them, to risk their lives? Each of them undoubtedly had personal reasons, and yet there must have been some unifying force, some energy or catalyst, a spark that ignited all those individual fires at that single moment in history.

“And then it came to me: words.

“The telling of the real story about the British Empire and its selfish and ultimately self-destructive mercantile system had provided that spark…” -page 257 of “Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man,” by John Perkins (published 2004)

***********************

Noam’s letter to me:

******************************************

Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
20D-219
Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

December 16, 1993

Dear Rick Battams,

Thanks for your interesting and thoughtful letter. I’m sorry, but not too surprised, to hear that you don’t get many responses, or at least useful ones. I’m afraid I’ve got to apologize too. I’m absolutely inundated with mail, try to at least acknowledge everything, but couldn’t possibly keep up seriously in a 24-hour day, even if I devoted full-time to it.

On the questions you raised, Gore Vidal was exaggerating a bit if he said I couldn’t publish in the US. I can publish with marginal presses and small journals. Glad you liked Rudmin’s book. Pretty surprising things, I thought, but he’s too be taken seriously. On JFK, my own views might surprise you. I don’t find evidence for a conspiracy very convincing, and as for a high-level conspiracy that might have had any significant policy implications, the evidence is powerfully against it. In fact, it’s rare that historical evidence converges so on such a conclusion. I’ve explained my reasons in a recent book, Rethinking Camelot (South End/Black Rose in Montreal), which I’ll bet was not one of the 2000 reveiwed in the Star, which you mentioned. Peter Dale Scott is a personal friend, and has done some interesting work. He certainly knows the details that might somehow relate to the Kennedy assassination very fully, but he presents no convincing case, in my opinion (and in fact hardly pretends to), and on the matter of Vietnam, he is just wildly wrong, so much so that he cannot even comprehend detailed factual analyses that depart from his premises (there’s a section in his book on me that illustrates that dramatically; I’ve rarely seen such extraordinary misreading and misunderstanding, even on trivial matters, completely without malice incidentally). On Freemasonry, I know essentially nothing. As for belief in God, people are of course free to choose their beliefs as they wish, but my own path is to try to keep to beliefs that can be somehow confirmed or disconfirmed, and that leaves me no place for belief in any kind of deity or counter-deity, though I understand very well the deep meaning that humans have always found in a very wide range of such beliefs – actually very wide range. I can’t lie to people, even if it disappoints them. Those are my principles, for what they are worth.

Sincerely,
[Noam's signature]
Noam Chomsky
********************************************

* “Bordering On Aggression” by Floyd Rudmin
* “Bordering On Aggression” lecture in the Science for Peace series
* “The Invasion Of Canada” by Michel Chossudovsky
* Gore Vidal
* “Jack The Ripper: The Final Solution” by Stephen Knight. You will not find honest or sensible discussion of Knight’s research anywhere online. Wikipedia, which can be edited by anyone, skews the image of the man, for example. Incredibly, The best ‘commentary’ about Knight’s work on Freemasonry can be found in the fictional -because there was no Sherlock Holmes – movie titled “Murder By Decree,” starring Christopher Plummer and James Mason. Stephen also wrote “The Brotherhood: The Explosive Expose Of The Secret World Of The Freemasons.” Martin Short (author, not comedian) wrote a sequel to Knight’s last book on Masons (getting his information about the Biblical temple completely wrong. Nevertheless…), using Knight’s material, titled “Inside The Brotherhood: Explosive Secrets Of The Freemasons.” You don’t hear much from Short these days and information about him online is scant.
* Peter Dale Scott
* “Rethinking Camelot” by Noam Chomsky

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment