I Am Wikileaks (Open Letter / Petition)

Click on the image to go to the petition site.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

See below the sticky for NEW CONTENT.

beans Haiti disappeared Metanoia

Posted in General, Urgent

Covid 19 – The Limited View From The Highwire part 2

What follows is from the June 25, 2020 episode of The Highwire.

Christine Francis, Tony Fauci, Jerome Adams

The show starts off with a review of what the gangster experts had to say about masks early on in the manufactured covid 19 crisis. Christine Francis (World Health Organization; Try finding her image online!), Tony Fauci (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Jerome Adams (Surgeon General) are shown telling people that masks do not help to stop the spread of covid 19 and could instead cause health problems. (You have to be fitted for a N95 mask because Rockefeller health care ideology includes the idea that there are microscopic foreign invaders who will attack you and enter your body and harm you. I think surgeons should wear masks as a courtesy for their patients whose bodies are under them and opened up and that’s all.) Now, those same scammers are saying something different about masks. Why? They have to keep the hoax alive. The Transnational Capitalist Class demands it. Tony Fauci, on June 12, essentially told some reporter that he had lied previously about masks. He says that they were worried that if everyone went out and bought masks, then there would not be enough left for health care professionals. Del sarcastically asks whether doctors get their masks from Costco and places like that where regular people go to buy masks. Did those regular people who shop at such places know that they were depriving their health care professionals of crucial ppe?

So, Del asks, What happened to all that science that those early experts spouted? Has ‘that’ changed?

Those people are pathetic. And their response to the problem that they created of making people think that masks are unnecessary and potentially unsafe (discarding a measure that could induce fear) is for them to say that it’s our fault that we don’t want to wear masks. They are saying that we are anti-science. Hey, They’re willing to follow a plan hatched, before they announced publicly the name “covid 19,” to have a pandemic and at some point after the lockdown and subsequent easing (not quite) of the suppression, blame protesters (who are good and bad) and sane, healthy people who aren’t wearing masks, for a second wave of the disease to be announced, so Why would they hesitate to lie about anything? (Event, 201, which can be seen as a smoking gun, was a table-top exercise that would prepare – in this case it was more than preparation – authorities worldwide to deal with any actual pandemic. They all but called the virus in their exercise covid 19. They called it nCoV-2019.) The shameless Tony Fauci turns around and says that it’s anti-science people who don’t want to wear masks. After he and others invoked science to convince us that masks were not a solution but were instead problematic, and when we respond accordingly, he says that our response is criminal and that we are anti-science? Take a good look folks. The covid 19 pandemic is a huge, harmful hoax that very much depended on gangster politicians and ‘professionals’ like Tony Fauci for its success.

From the article titled “Fauci Blames ‘Anti-Science Bias’ for People Not Following COVID-19 Rules” by Aila Slisco (Newsweek), we get the following: “Leading infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci has suggested that a pervasive “anti-science bias” may be leading many Americans to disregard the advice of public health experts amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Fauci made the remarks during a Wednesday interview on the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Learning Curve podcast. The doctor called the reasoning involved in choosing to willfully ignore science despite obvious risks to health “inconceivable.”

T. Becket Adams

Del also shows us this Washington Examiner article (which the Washington Examiner website will not return in a search on its website using ‘any’ search parameter):

“Anthony Fauci lied about masks; now he complains that people ‘distrust authority'” by Becket Adams. An excerpt follows:

Dr. Anthony Fauci lied when he downplayed and even discouraged the use of masks in protecting against the coronavirus. Now, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has the gall to complain about the glut of “anti-science” people who “don’t believe authority.”

There are certainly anti-science cliques in the United States. But the distrust of authority, especially in regard to this viral pandemic, is well earned. Fauci has personally done more harm to the cause of combating the coronavirus than he likely will ever understand.

“One of the problems we face in the United States is that, unfortunately, there is a combination of an anti-science bias that people are — for reasons that sometimes are, you know, inconceivable and not understandable — they just don’t believe science, and they don’t believe authority,” Fauci said this week in an episode of the Department of Health and Human Services’s podcast Learning Curve.

He added, “So, when they see someone up in the White House, which has an air of authority to it, who’s talking about science, that there are some people who just don’t believe that — and that’s unfortunate because, you know, science is truth. … If you go by the evidence and by the data, you’re speaking the truth.”

Again, it cannot be stressed enough that Fauci knowingly lied about masks and recently admitted it. And even if he were not speaking specifically of the coronavirus, he is the last healthcare expert who should be complaining about a widespread lack of trust in authority.

Del Bigtree

Del then brings Jefferey Jaxen into the show. Jefferey talks about Bayer’s woes since acquiring Monsanto. And yet, as Del notes, when you shop where products like Roundup are sold, you’ll see Roundup on the shelves! (*edit, July 1, 2020 – As James Evan Pilato notes, Because Bayer threw money at the lawsuits to make them go away and they didn’t have to admit wrongdoing in court, that’s why they are able to still sell their poison. How much justice is there in this dark world and under the American-led Corporatocracy?) Del makes the very good point that Bayer threw $10 billion at the problem of the lawsuit against it (over Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) rather than challenge, with science, the lawsuit. Would this now cash-starved giant do that if it could have used science to defeat the lawsuit? They really don’t give a damn about people’s health, Do they?

Jefferey then shows us a news report from KTLA 5 about dangerous hand sanitizers. “FDA warns against using 9 hand sanitizers because they may contain potentially fatal ingredient” is the name of the CNN Wire article. Del asks where the FDA was to begin with and when you read the list of dangerous effects of prolonged exposure to methanol you’ll feel a similar outrage and perhaps think twice before squirting sanitizer on your hands everywhere all the time. If that sanitizer is not yours and you don’t know what’s in it, Should you trust it? Then again, If you are one of the large bovine crowd who are wearing harmful masks and avoiding (always only ‘sometimes’) others (who will soon definitely be healthier than you), then don’t worry about it. You’re trying to get sick and should go ahead and squirt chemicals on your hands all the time everywhere without thinking about it. Del also points out that triclosan in sanitizers is very dangerous as well. Again, For those who care, be aware of that. For those whose care is limited to following orders issued to them from their televisions sets, carry on not caring.

Jefferey looks at an article from the Hill (which is an awful source, but The Highwire, as good as it is, is limited and too hooked into establishment crap) that reports that “The House subcommittee tasked with overseeing the country’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has written to the country’s largest nursing home companies, as well as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, demanding thorough reports on their preparedness for and handling of COVID-19.” Jefferey notes that they are also beginning to lean on five different governors over their handling of the covid 19 (manufactured) crisis. But why does The Highwire just accept statements from authorities about covid 19 deaths when they know that they lie about that? The conclusion that Del should draw from the nursing home deaths, in my view, is that the covid 19 pandemic is a hoax. If it was real then would those governors have risked their careers and freedom (even in their lawless world there’s some accountability sometimes) and acted the way they did?

Del then looks at a Telegraph article by Phoebe Southworth titled “Coronavirus has downgraded from ‘tiger to wild cat’ and could die out without vaccine.” Whatever. This is misdirection in my view. If covid 19 was a real virus, then it was just a cold that has come and gone and is now ancient history. The lie is all that is alive right now and Del shouldn’t help it live. When I went to the Telegraph website to find the above article, I saw there this article as well: “Leicester put back in lockdown as coronavirus cases rise,” by Harry Yorke, Robert Mendick and Gordon Rayner. (The tiger to wildcat article is dated June 20. The terror article is dated June 29.) Del says that when you get out of the apocalyptic news cycle, there’s some incredible things. (In, out, in, out, in, out. That’s not hell, Is it?) He’s implying that the tiger to wildcat article is good news. It’s hardly good news and that isn’t the point. The point is that it’s a lie. They will call anything covid 19 and those who have been paying attention – which group I assumed included Del Bigtree – know that. Don’t build people up with false hope.

Jon Rappoport

Del seems to be forthright but I don’t know. Jon Rappoport made this comment in one of his blog posts and it would apply here I think:

“You can ENTER THEIR GAME, temporarily, to show how, in their own terms, by their own standards, they are contradicting themselves and committing fraud.

“Or you can STAND OUTSIDE THEIR GAME, and show how the very structure and rules and assumptions of the game, to begin with, are riddled with lies.

“In this article, I’ll do both. And I’ll make it clear when I’m INSIDE and when I’m OUTSIDE.

“Why bother? Because it clarifies the mind. That’s always a good thing. It’s especially good during this wall-to-wall criminal event called COVID-19.

“And readers deserve to know whether a writer is actually accepting the game the bad guys are playing; or whether he’s just momentarily dipping into the game, in order to reveal its absurdities.”

For a fact, I would rather that Del was just entering their game in order to expose them than actually be conning us.

And a final point, again from Jon Rapport (“COVID: It’s not one thing, it’s not one disease”):

“The stage magicians present the “pandemic” as one disease with one cause, and people buy in immediately.

“Some people who reject the coronavirus as the cause present ANOTHER single cause—they’re falling for the basic con job.

“There are people in Wuhan who have pneumonia because of the horrendous air quality in the city. There are people in New York who have ordinary flu-like illness. There are people in Italy who have histories of multiple, long-term, serious health conditions—pneumonia, flu, cardiac problems, kidney problems—made far worse through treatment with toxic drugs. There are people in hospitals around the world who, after being diagnosed with COVID, are dosed with powerful toxic antiviral drugs. There are people on breathing ventilators who are being given too much oxygen and too much pressure—and their lungs collapse. There are perfectly healthy people who are testing positive for the virus because the test is irreparably flawed…

“All these people are called “COVID cases.”

“The diagnostic test for the virus, as I’ve shown in many articles, spits out false-positive verdicts, and those results are meaningless—but they form a picture of escalating case numbers. And people buy in.

“The stage magic trick is easy to see, once you grasp the tactics: Claim to have discovered a new virus. Say it is spreading and needs to be contained. Invent an umbrella label for the epidemic: COVID-19. Start pulling all sorts of people with all sorts of different conditions under the umbrella and say they’re all “cases.” Use a diagnostic test that will automatically turn out many verdicts of “infected.” And you have the illusion of a pandemic.

“At this point, people will show up and say, BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS? WHAT ABOUT THAT? WHAT ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE SUDDENLY DYING IN CITY X? These questioners are trying to stick with the one disease and the one cause. But think it through. If people are actually dying in City X suddenly—and weren’t in the process of dying for a long time since they’re elderly and have a long history of serious illness—then you need to see what is going on in City X specifically…AND NOT ASSUME IT’S THE SAME THING THAT’S GOING ON IN WUHAN OR SEATTLE OR NEW YORK OR BERLIN OR MILAN.”

Does Del need to be told that? He does seem to come around in this show when he complains about how anyone with the sniffles, if he or she offers to be tested (a bad idea but that’s what they’re forcing on us), is then said to have covid 19. (And he seems to go into and out of ‘their’ frame constantly.) That’s the role of the corporate media and it is not failing in that regard. Del notes that the media slyly replaces ‘deaths’ with ‘cases’ and reports cases (someone with sniffles, a totally natural thing) in such a way that the public mind interprets that as ‘deaths’. Del notes that they also play word games, with news reports like one out of Texas where it was reported that they had a shortage of beds, when in fact they only had a shortage of beds in ICUs. (I don’t quite get that, but anyway…)

I’m not, the way that other ‘Christians’ are, telling people that things will get better in the way that they think things will get better (which means going back to where we were just before the covid 19 pandemic hoax started), where we do ‘not’ roll into Armageddon and the destruction of this evil, cruel, Godless system of things. I tell people that things will get worse, because that’s the news I’m getting from sources that are more reliable (in some areas) than The Highwire and that’s what I believe. I may be wrong. But two things make me think I’m right. 1. Covid 1984 is massive and frightingly destructive and terrifying, the biggest hoax in human history and, clearly, an attack by the politicians and their masters on God (nature, including God’s human creation) and 2. the Christian’s Bible prophecy about the UN being specially empowered for a short time, during which it targets organized religion in some fashion, which looks very likely (in connection with covid 19) at this point (Revelation 17:9-14). There’s the Corbett Report, for example. James called it early on. He said that subsequent waves were baked into the hoax.

There’s been plenty of reports in the last few days about fresh outbreaks just in Canada. Vaccine Choice Canada emailed me to tell me that Kingston, Ontario, made the wearing of masks in public mandatory because of a fresh outbreak of covid 19. Same for Welland and Essex, in Ontario. They are not quitting, Del. They’ve invested billions in this hoax. They are not quitting and we don’t have the power to stop them and bravado isn’t going to do anything but make those who are excited by it disappointed when covid 1984 gets more firmly established and the remaining dim light fades. I’m telling people that that will happen and that that new world order will be firmly established and last only a moment since all of this rolls into Armageddon, a good thing. That’s ‘my’ Christianity. That’s how Jehovah God wants his people to use him. He’s not there just for people like Del to exclaim “My God” when he’s talking about other things, something Del does all the time. God wants his loyal followers to tell people about him and his Kingdom. And Christians don’t push Darwin’s theories the way Del does.

Del reports that more and more people are backing away from the idea that we are going to have a vaccine. (Perhaps. But don’t forget that they’ve invested BILLIONS in this scam.) Del shows us a Fox News report by Edmund DeMarche titled: “Coronavirus vaccine may never come, health expert warns.” Del seems to be unaware of the great reset. That’s probably because of The Highwire’s aversion to alternative media, which, ironically, it calls itself.

Del shows a chart (below), labelled ‘theoretical death curve’, that he explains, pointing out how the suppression (police State) measures imposed on his country, along with the treatment meted out to the elderly by about five state governors, were responsible for a huge surge in deaths. (But was covid 19 specifically the cause of any of those deaths? Also, Del has an expert on, below, who refers to a similar chart that he says is better.) Del follows a discussion of the ‘theoretical death curve’ chart with another chart outlining the five main ‘mistakes’ made by authorities, contributing to so many deaths.

And The Highwire still isn’t talking about Dr Wolfgang Wodarg’s investigation (in which he pleads for others to investigate) showing the problem of using HCQ to treat patients (covid 19 or other) from malaria countries who (or ‘some’ of whom?) possess a G6PD gene. Again, That’s The Highwire’s aversion to genuine alternative media at work. Major media seems uninterested in Dr Wodarg’s findings. Del characterizes the ‘mistakes’ that the above governors made as a panic caused by the media. I’m sure that some of those swept up in this evil pandemic hoax did make honest mistakes, but overall, ‘panic’ is a term I’d reserve for those not in the know on this hoax and I’m not sure that that would include those gangster governors. As for media, those are people who have the ability to do research. And their bosses are certainly in the know, not to mention funded by big pharma and the military and totally connected to government. They police us, in that sense. They are our jailers, since governments serve as Transnational Capital’s police. If governments are nation States’ police headquarters, then the corporate media that channels State propaganda is helping it to do counterrevolution, which means war against the people.

Del then introduces Theo Wilson, a CNN contributor. (See what I mean?) Then Del shows us a few video clips where Theo preaches. You don’t impress me when you give a TEDx talk. (James Corbett gave one once, so I guess you can be honest and give a TEDx talk.) He strikes me as slick, spouting great lines on stage but showing a lot less polish when he’s having a regular conversation. But lets hear him out. I paused here to do a quick check on Theo Wilson. I used the parameter “Theo Wilson and Black Lives Matter” as well as “Theo Wilson and BLM.” I couldn’t find anything substantial. I didn’t spend a whole of time with that search, but one site I click on gave me a tidbit. AJC (an Atlanta news site of some sort) carried a snippet of an article (by Kyle Nazario) about Theo, providing a link to the full version, which you can’t read because the link takes you to a dead page. But here’s what a snippet from the snippet says: “Over the course of eight months, Wilson explored a twisted, alternative universe where commonly accepted facts of history or science had been turned upside down. In this universe, slavery was good for African Americans, Black Lives Matter is funded by billionaire George Soros and freed blacks held more slaves than whites pre-Civil War.” (my bolding) Now, If I listen to Theo’s TEDx talk, will I hear him say that he think Black Lives Matter is ‘not’ funded by George Soros? Here’s what F. William Engdahl (in his article titled “America’s Own Color Revolution”) has to say about funders of Black Lives Matter:

))) )) )
If we step back from the immediate issue of videos showing a white Minneapolis policeman pressing his knee on the neck of a black man, George Floyd, and look at what has taken place across the nation since then, it is clear that certain organizations or groups were well-prepared to instrumentalize the horrific event for their own agenda.

The protests since May 25 have often begun peacefully only to be taken over by well-trained violent actors. Two organizations have appeared regularly in connection with the violent protests—Black Lives Matter and Antifa (USA). Videos show well-equipped protesters dressed uniformly in black and masked (not for coronavirus to be sure), vandalizing police cars, burning police stations, smashing store windows with pipes or baseball bats. Use of Twitter and other social media to coordinate “hit-and-run” swarming strikes of protest mobs is evident.

What has unfolded since the Minneapolis trigger event has been compared to the wave of primarily black ghetto protest riots in 1968. I lived through those events in 1968 and what is unfolding today is far different. It is better likened to the Yugoslav color revolution that toppled Milosevic in 2000…

To get a better grasp how serious the present protest movement is we should look at who has been pouring millions into BLM. The Antifa is more difficult owing to its explicit anonymous organization form. However, their online Handbook openly recommends that local Antifa “cells” join up with BLM chapters…

In short the protests over the alleged police killing of a black man in Minnesota are now being used to call for a revolution against capitalism. FRSO [Freedom Road Socialist Organization] is an umbrella for dozens of amorphous groups including Black Lives Matter or BLM. What is interesting about the self-described Marxist-Leninist roots of the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO) is not so much their left politics as much as their very establishment funding by a group of well-endowed tax-exempt foundations.

Alicia Garza of BLM is also a board member or executive of five different Freedom Road front groups including 2011 Board chair of Right to the City Alliance, Board member of School of Unity and Liberation (SOUL), of People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER), Forward Together and Special Projects director of National Domestic Workers Alliance.

The Right to the City Alliance got $6.5 million between 2011 and 2014 from a number of very established tax-exempt foundations including the Ford Foundation ($1.9 million), from both of George Soros’s major tax-exempts–Open Society Foundations, and the Foundation to Promote Open Society for $1.3 million. Also the cornflake-tied Kellogg Foundation $250,000, and curiously, Ben & Jerry’s Foundation (ice cream) for $30,000.

Garza also got major foundation money as Executive Director of the FRSO front, POWER, where Obama former “green jobs czar” Van Jones, a self-described “communist” and “rowdy black nationalist,” now with CNN, was on the board. Alicia Garza also chaired the Right to the City Alliance, a network of activist groups opposing urban gentrification. That front since 2009 received $1.3 million from the Ford Foundation, as well as $600,000 from the Soros foundations and again, Ben & Jerry’s ($50,000). And Garza’s SOUL, which claimed to have trained 712 “organizers” in 2014, when she co-founded Black Lives Matter, got $210,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation and another $255,000 from the Heinz Foundation (ketchup and John Kerry family) among others. With the Forward Together of FRSO, Garza sat on the board of a “multi-racial organization that works with community leaders and organizations to transform culture and policy to catalyze social change.” It officially got $4 million in 2014 revenues and from 2012 and 2014, the organization received a total of $2.9 million from Ford Foundation ($655,000) and other major foundations.

Nigeria-born BLM co-founder Opal Tometi likewise comes from the network of FRSO. Tometi headed the FRSO’s Black Alliance for Just Immigration. Curiously with a “staff” of two it got money from major foundations including the Kellogg Foundation for $75,000 and Soros foundations for $100,000, and, again, Ben & Jerry’s ($10,000). Tometi got $60,000 in 2014 to direct the group.
( (( (((

I don’t doubt Endgdahl’s facts. I take issue with his use of the term ‘far Left’. According to rightwingers (which I assume he is , going by the article from which the above quote is taken), there is no good Left and anyone who opposes capitalism – which right now is giving us a global biosecurity police State with lots of accompanying terror and destruction – is wrong. Will imperfect humans, Right, Left, progressive, establishment, save us? They won’t save anyone, including themselves. There’s no place for any of those opposers of God in Jehovah God’s new world order. (By the way, there’s a number of good examinations of Black Lives Matters out there. There’s the UK Column News show for example, and there’s also Spiro’s report.)

After his careless (hopefully that’s all it was) fêting of Theo Wilson, I doubt Del Bigtree.

From Theo’s website:

That doesn’t draw me. At all.

Theo tells Del that he’s not part of the Black Lives Matter movement per se (?) and says that that’s a whole other topic that he doesn’t want to get into. And yet, in a video clip that Del shows Theo says that he’s a media activist “especially” in the Black Lives Matter movement. I can see why Theo doesn’t want to get into that with Del – if BLM is being exposed. Theo’s a State asset (in my opinion) and he’s probably been told to lay low or maybe he just figured that out on his own. Before going to a clip where Theo is making a presentation before a committee of Colorado legislators, Del reminds his audience that they are trying to stomp on the health freedom movement with a bill, namely 20-163, that will re-write and re-label religious and philosophical exemption lines in existing legislation. I guess that the idea is to characterize religious and philosophical exemptions in such a way that it can’t be used by people who would otherwise use it to avoid being vaccinated.

Theo gets into the exact type of vaccine that Bill Gates want to shoot into people, starting with colored people (which is suspicious), which was welcomed comment. People need to know what Bill Gates et al have planned for them. I try to tell people here in Toronto. Torontonians are really dull to go by the mask lunacy I’m seeing and which is getting worse. Theo makes the point that he doesn’t know what’s involved in that vaccine technology which has never been used on humans. He should get out of his establishment, corporate media, bubble in that case. But it is true that no one knows fully what those vaccines will include and what they will do to us. Will DARPA tell us? On the other hand, We do know what they are doing overall. They are ushering in the global biosecurity police State. In view of that ‘fact’, What then might they put into Bill’s vaccine? (See “We Are Witnessing A Nightmarish Technocratic Reengineering Of Our Lives Under The Guise Of COVID-19” by Ryan Cristián.)

Theo notes that people just aren’t talking about the newfangled experimental vaccine that Bill is going to force on them. Most people just don’t care. Most people are not even capable of sustaining an intelligent conversation and if you try to have one with them, they get antsy because they fear that you’re going to make them look stupid. But among the few that can still think and who lift a little finger in order to inform themselves, there’s great interest in this horror story that is Bill Gates’s gene gun. A video excerpt (two excerpts in one) on my Bitchute channel about Bill’s gene gun/vaccine is my top viewed video. I have only 52 subscribers but in less than 48 hours that video had over a thousand views. It has now had almost 2000 views. (See “Don’t Get Shot By A Gene Gun Either.”)

Del then looks at an article, by Jackie Salo, in the New York Post titled “Oregon county issues face mask order that exempts non-white people.” Right. Are they trying to divide and conquer us or what?! Of course, the authorities cited in the article try to rationalize the move. But clearly, if covid 19 was the health threat that they say it is, this decision would not have been taken. But we who pay attention know what’s going on. Theo says that those who made that decision were trying to help. Nice try. Theo says that we will all have to come together in the face of what’s coming. He mentions the negative views of BLM by Conservatives. Whoa! This isn’t about political parties (and I’m far from rightwing). Anyone solid taking a good look at BLM will have nothing to do with them. Bye bye Theo.

Del then shows some corporate news media clips of reporters making those who don’t want to wear masks out to be criminals. The frightening thing about the clips are the regular people who have drank the Kool-Aid and become downright threatening. Then he introduces David Rodriguez (of the GATTO Project, which I gather is on Facebook, where I don’t go) who took a video camera and together with a few friends went shopping here in there in California in order to show people how the mask-wearing nonsense was affecting people. Just as here in Toronto, a lot of people are nuts. I call them cattle. They’ve allowed themselves to be turned into cattle. Some wearing masks don’t want to. That’s good. David reminds me that one of the saddest, scariest things that has come out of the mask-wearing craziness is the sight of parents putting masks on their children. They are literally harming their own children simply because tv told them to. That’s unforgivable. For a fact, their children DO NOT NEED THEM!

Del then shows us a great clip of Tony Fauci playing with his mask. ‘If’ there’s viruses and if they are what scammers like Tony say they are, then What is this? Take a look:

Del feels some need to refer to the Founding Fathers who he says, in so many words, we should look to for guidance in these troubling times. How Christian of you Del. (See “The Declaration Of Independence And The Constitution.”)

Del couldn’t get a pro mask individual to go on his show and present the argument for wearing a mask, so Del attempts to present that position so that we can talk about it. Del shows us a paper from a website called The Physics of Fluids. It’s titled “On respiratory droplets and face masks,” and the authors are Talib Dbouk and Dimitris Drikakis. Are you ready for some genuine bullcrap? Here’s an excerpt from that paper that Del looks at:

==== =

We computationally investigated the flow physics of respiratory droplets arising from coughing around and through a face mask. We considered a mask consisting of air-permeable filtering material made of porous fibrous layers. The fluid flow and cough dynamics significantly influence the droplet transmission and, in turn, the overall mask efficiency:

Without wearing a mask, droplets travel to about 70 cm.
Wearing a mask, the bulk of droplets will travel about half the distance.
However, in both cases, there are still isolated droplets transmitted beyond 70 cm…

The mask to face fitting is important. Even in the case of a tight fitting scenario, if there exist some small openings, this can lead to additional leakage of droplets around the mask, which cannot be ignored. It contributes to an additional reduction in the mask efficiency with respect to efficiency reduction induced by the cyclic behavior of the coughing incident.
= ====

“…an additional reduction in the mask efficiency with respect to efficiency reduction induced by the cyclic behavior of the coughing incident.” Really?! I will not take those professional scam artists seriously. Sorry.

Del then looks at a few other studies, one by some 19 authors, as far as I can tell from the screen shot. The paper concludes with a soft endorsement of the practice of wearing masks, which tells me something about the scientists standing behind this paper. Del looks at another paper by C. Raina MacIntyre and Abrar Ahmad Chughtai. As Del looks at the pro papers and reads from them for us, phrases like ‘could help’ are common and then, regarding the tests themselves, you see lots of caveats. And, Del notes, that’s the basis for a police officer smashing a woman to the ground because she wasn’t wearing a mask. That officer is a dedicated, appointed gatekeeper. Appointed (paid, aware of their roles as gatekeepers) and self-appointed (who can be anyone at all) gatekeepers are what normal people are up against in this attack on light, nature and God.

Del then introduces us to Denis Rancourt, a former professor of physics with the University of Ottawa. His article is titled “Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy/By Denis Rancourt, Phd/11 June, 2020.” See the image below. I can find Denis’s section on ResearchGate but not the article here looked at. However, I can find the article easily enough online. I’ll here link to Mark Taliano’s version. As I looked around on Denis’s ResearchGate pages, I realized that I should bookmark this very good resource. I also noticed an article by him titled “Some Big Lies of Money, Medicine and Science.” Attached to that is a blurb/abstract that informs us of the following: “A tenured Canadian physics professor, fired for his dissidence, breaks ranks by asserting that established orthodoxy in economics, medicine and science is intended as a web of lies to shield and maintain power structures.”

Denis says he sees no understanding but a lot of talk and posturing and policy statements coming from authorities who tell us we need to wear masks. If you go to the literature you want to look at papers reporting on randomized controlled trials. You can’t just ask those who had a sickness a while ago about it. You need verified outcomes. If you select only those reliable trials, in order to avoid bias, and look at those, none of them show a statistically significant advantage to wearing a mask. If there were any kind of statistical advantage to wearing a mask then one of those proper trials would have shown that.

Denis is now with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association and in that capacity he wrote to the WHO to demand an answer to why they are taking the unscientific approach to masks that they are taking. Instead of relying on solid science, the WHO is relying on scientists, of whom there are a lot, who are writing papers based on substandard science (which is easier to do), which doesn’t do controlled trials and doesn’t use verified results. We are drowning in professional scam artists. The authorities often toss out the line that ‘with the emergency, it’s important to get solutions and answers quickly’, but Denis points out that that’s backwards. If you’re dealing with an actual pandemic or what have you, then you want to take whatever time you need to in order to get the science right when it comes to solutions. (That’s if your intentions are good. And that explains why we are seeing what we are seeing.) Denis’s communication to the WHO included pointing out to it dangers in connection with masks that it wasn’t looking at all. Denis reads from a new paper that looks at 14 studies, properly done, that point out that face masks and hand hygiene (washing your hands very frequently I would think) and sanitizing everything in site doesn’t make a big difference (“limited effectiveness”). I knew it! I wash my hands no more or less than I did before the hoax launched. And I am ‘less’ bothered by invisible, naturally occurring, microorganisms than I was going into covid 1984, thanks to my research and increased understanding of the natural world.

Denis then launches into a speech about evolution. I’m happy for him if believing that fantasy makes him happy.

Denis says that it would be surprising if masks did work. Denis then points out that he wrote a paper based on a Highwire show and that paper is titled “All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response.” So Denis is in total agreement with Del that, like other governments, the US has been responsible, via the extreme suppression measures that were implemented, for a huge number of deaths that authorities are just calling deaths by covid 19. Will politicians go to jail? Ha! You’d have to build a billion new jails and you couldn’t get anyone to arrest and prosecute them anyway because most of the world is freaking criminal! But there will be a proper response. Denis thinks that there should be proper criminal investigations related to the deaths from suppression that have occurred in jurisdictions where that was done. Well sure. But the powerful special interests who are ushering in the global biosecurity police State, a hulked-out Corporatocracy, aren’t likely going to agree to that. Really, How much justice happens in this world? You get it here and there, now and again, but that’s it. And the justice that you do get is usually justice that is biased against weaker criminals.

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Covid 19 – Don’t Give Up Hoax Bill!

My letter of complaint, including typos, to the Toronto Transit Commission follows:

TCC: Re Your Off The Charts Abuse June 25, 2020

Since moving to Toronto in 1993, I have always found your public transit service to be awful on every level. I’m not sure exactly when I started using it, as I had a car for the first few years that I was in Toronto. But I have been a user of public transit for many years now. With covid 1984, the abuse by TTC has been off the charts. Management, both political and with the TTC is to blame.

I note that the TTC is a major client of a public relations propaganda firm called the Omnicom Group. Author Peter Phillip’s notes, about the The PRP industry, that it “continually features products that are a danger to humanity. PRP firms offer brand enhancement worldwide for numerous tobacco, alcohol, junk food (sugary, salty, and fatty “treats”), and pharmaceutical products.” Once again, The TTC is a major client of that organization. (So much for ‘publicly funded’.) I can see no reason why the TTC would reach out to the Omnicon Group for advice in connection with the covid 19 pandemic (hoax), but I can see why the Omnicom Group would look for, and take advantage of, any leverage it has among its clients to further the aims of the Transnational Capitalist Class of which it is a part. There it is on page 59 of Peter Phillips’s 2018 book, “Giants – The Global Power Elite”:

“Their number one priority is to bring in average returns on investment of 3 percent to 10 percent or more. Where the investments occur is less important than a continious [sic] return that supports growth in the overall market. Therefore investments in war weapons, tobacco, fossil fuels, farm land, pesticides, vaccines, private prisons, charter schools, fast foods, security companies, spyware, cruise ships, vacation resorts, or nuclear power are all just investments requiring adequate returns.

“Our main point here is that these firms need to maintain the investment of more than $41 trillion somewhere in order to insure the continued growth of global capitalism.”

My question to TTC management is this: Are you getting advice about how to manage the covid 19 pandemic from an organization that doesn’t give a damn about people’s health?

I also know about the city of Toronto. It, like the TTC, is abusive. I work at a city site, in security. My security company wants me to do a health check before work, a terrifying thing, for honest employees like myself, when you know what the consequences will be if you can’t whip through the health check answering all the questions about your health in such as way so as to indicate that you are not a little under the weather. (People who get sick and who see doctors now run the high risk of being labelled sick with covid 19, just as those who die, from anything, are being said to have died ‘by’ covid 19, which refers to a virus that they haven’t actually proven exists. It’s well known that governments everywhere have instructed their medical professionals to lie about the cause of deaths by sick patients. Deborah Birx went on tv and openly instructed the doctors in America to lie about covid 19 deaths – and they’ve gone along with it! / https://www.bitchute.com/video/ylMG0jRzCYXa/) On top of that, the city wants me to do an online health check before starting my shift. The city constantly tells my employer that it isn’t going to pay for my work because it has issues with my log-in times. I have never been late in my almost 6 years of work at this site. I am always early and I never leave early. (That’s why they want me at this site!) The city won’t lift a little finger to double check with someone. (I had a lengthy chat with an operator about this abuse and he told me that there’s absolutely no way the city would only accept my log-ins and -outs if there are exactly on the minute that my shift starts/end. He said they’d be good with a late or early log-in/log-out up to 20 minutes! Am I being targetted for harassment?) I have been in security full time for 21 years and only make minimum wage. That’s called exploitation and abuse. I’ve been with this particular company, which makes an appearance in Peter Phillips’s book, “Giants,” since April 2006. Because of the city’s constant haranguing of my immediate employer, I am told to log in, and out, at exactly the minute of my shift start and end time. That’s two log ins for starting and ending that I have to do right on that minute. Sometimes when I call the city, I am asked to give, again, all of my information. There goes that minute. Or the operator is temporarily not available. The abuse never ends.

Vaccine Choice Canada passed me this information:

You may be interested in this: COVID-19 and Ontario’s Human Rights Code – Questions and Answers


12. Can an employer, service provider or landlord require me to wear a mask because of COVID-19?

Ontario recommends, but does not currently require, that people use a face covering (non-medical mask such as a cloth mask) to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19 when physical distancing and keeping two-metres apart from others may be challenging or not possible, such as on public transit, in smaller grocery stores, pharmacies or when receiving essential services.

The OHRC’s policy position is that any requirements related to health and safety and COVID-19, such as wearing a mask, using other protective equipment or following a procedure to perform work safely, or to protect people receiving services or living in housing, do not generally cause concern under the Code.

At the same time, employers, housing and other service providers should recognize that health and safety requirements such as masks may have a negative impact on vulnerable populations identified by a ground under the Code who may not have access to such equipment. Other people may not be able to use the equipment or follow a procedure because of their disability or for another Code-related reason.

People with certain disabilities may have difficulty wearing a mask if, for example, they have severe allergies, experience asthma attacks or have other respiratory issues. Masks are a barrier to people with hearing disabilities who rely on lip reading or facial expressions to communicate. Masks may not be suitable for children and adults with certain physical, intellectual or cognitive disabilities such as autism.

The Ministry of Health advises that face coverings should not be placed on or used by children under the age of two, anyone who has trouble breathing, or anyone who is unable to remove it without assistance.

Organizations have a duty under the Code to accommodate these types of individual needs related to legitimate COVID-19 requirements, unless it would amount to undue hardship based on cost or health and safety. For example, it may be necessary to provide free masks or other means so that people with disabilities can safely perform work, receive services or live in congregate housing. For example, offering curbside pickup would generally allow a person to receive a retail service even if, because of their disability, they are unable to wear the required mask to enter a store.

An inability to access or use a mask or other equipment, or to follow a health and safety procedure, must not lead to automatic negative consequences such as employee discipline or termination, complete denial of service or eviction from housing.

No one should experience harassment or other discriminatory treatment based on a Code ground because they are unable to wear a mask, or choose to wear, or not wear, a mask, or require someone else to wear a mask based on advice from public health officials.

Everyone involved should be flexible and explore whether individual accommodation is possible, including alternative ways a person might safely continue to work, receive a service or live in congregate housing.

Organizations should make clear the reasons why a mask or other equipment or procedure is needed in the circumstances.

In addition, workers have rights and employers have obligations for workers’ health and safety under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Visit the Ontario Ministry of Labour, Training and Skills Development website for more information, including how to contact the Ministry.

The bolding in the above quote was by Vaccine Choice Canada.

Did Rob Ford change his mind about masks? I don’t know. I don’t turn a tv on myself like most of world does. If he hasn’t, and he still only recommends masks (for wrong reasons), then the Ontario Human Rights code, above, says that you shouldn’t discriminate against those who choose to not wear a mask. Just with the TTC’s announcement, the TTC has discriminated against me. Once I put on that mask, that discrimination will have escalated to assault.

What does the Canadian government say (when it is not doing propaganda on corporate media)? There, on a government website (“Public health measures: Canadian Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: Planning Guidance for the Health Sector” / https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/flu-influenza/canadian-pandemic-influenza-preparedness-planning-guidance-health-sector/public-health-measures.html), in a section ( Use Of Masks) that talks about masks, it tells us that:

Providing masks to well people is unlikely to be feasible or sustainable on a population basis in a pandemic and may not be an appropriate use of public resources since little evidence exists regarding their effectiveness in reducing the spread of disease in the general population.

I have become aware of the scam that is Rockefeller health care. While homeopathy has not disappeared; As major player, thanks to the plans, money and the influence of people like John D. Rockefeller, it doesn’t exist. (That history can be read by anyone who cares to read it. Right now, that should be everyone.) All of the health care guidance from governments, all of which look only to a Rockefeller-inspired and -designed health care system – allopathic, treating symptoms – should, in my view, be seen in this light. Even so, Doctors who hew to the Rockefeller medicine outlook are not pushing masks more than they are recommending that they not be used by healthy people.

Vaccine Choice Canada (and many other sources, such as Children’s Health Defense) provide tons of information about masks, but none of that information may appeal to organizations like the Omnicom Group or to those who they advise. But just because uncaring capitalists don’t agree that the wearing of masks by healthy people, in a non existent pandemic, is a crazy idea, that doesn’t mean that they are right. Does it?

Please see “Masking Reports & Citations” on the Vaccine Choice Canada website. It can be found at this link: https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/resources/masking-reports-citations/

Rick Battams

I received a non response response from the TTC, which I’ll show you below. The TTC did not attempt to engage me. That’s because it can’t and its abuse in relation to covid 19 is unwarranted and the entire package of lockdown measures in pace everywhere is unsupported by science.

I’ve only contacted the TTC once before using their online form. I complained about a driver who didn’t like the fact that I got on at a particular stop. He was out of line. There’s good drivers in the TTC and then there are many powertripping drivers. Covid 1984 is the powertripping drivers’ time to shine. I was on the bus this morning, headed home after working overnight, and witnessed a sad scene in which the bus driver called out to a man who was clearly mentally challenged – twittering softly to himself like a cornered animal – to ask him whether he paid (by tapping a Presto card, an abusive system). The man didn’t respond. It was a bonding opportunity for some other conformist who happened to sit across from me, as he and the driver dumped on fare evaders and had nothing to say about the crushing of democracy and human rights that were happening in this city. We were perhaps the only two people not masked, but he didn’t talk like he had a problem with it, so who knows why he wasn’t wearing one. The masked yahoo driver complained about all the passengers on his bus who had not paid and said that that will change after July 2nd when everyone will be masked and have to access the bus at the front in front of him. I pay my fare and would like others to, but there’s so many issues here. Simple-minded drivers like this one wouldn’t care or know. (If a fare-evader boards and doesn’t bother anyone else, I don’t care. For one thing, I don’t know his or her situation. The day before, however, the worst, abusive passenger you could imagine was absolutely bothering everyone and the driver didn’t say boo. It was a woman. Okay. Is she not allowed to do ‘something’? Will the police not respond? This is frequent on the TTC.) It sounded to me like that thoughtless, cold-hearted driver was looking forward to putting fare-evaders in their place. He’s clearly bonded with the abusive TTC. And the abusive TTC will no doubt look upon its police-minded drivers with favor as we dive deeper into covid 1984. I got an email from a woman who works at Vaccine Choice Canada this morning (June 27), informing me that they have now made mask-wearing in public mandatory in Windsor-Essex and Kingston, in Ontario. The cold that they labelled (for hoax purposes) covid 19 has come and gone and is ancient history, and was NEVER a pandemic, and this is what they are doing. Wake up people!

Here is the TTC’s non response response to my letter to the TTC:

What follows is from the above UK Column News show for June 24, 2020. The presenters are Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson. They first look at the UK government’s idea of opening up. The UK’s idea of opening up is to not really open up and to sort of open up but have rules in place that convey the message that there’s a killer virus out there ready to kill you. And the rules are absolutely nuts. If you’re in a pub, you must order your pint with an app. (Don’t give up your smart phones! Not.) You must have the music on low. That I don’t get. (I hate loud music anyway, but I’d rather listen to loud music than a gangster politician’s lies!) If citizens don’t observe the social distancing rules in pubs etc, the police can be called. Are citizens excited to go out! Or terrified? The presenters then show an image of professor John Edmunds, who is with SAGE. He is very worried about the so-called easing of restrictions, warning that it may allow the epidemic to again gain a foothold. Which means nothing. He’s worrying about cold returning, but colds (in this system of things) will always return and in that sense never go away. Formerly, We didn’t go bananas when people had a cold. But now that powerful special interests want to give us vaccines because they need to find new areas to invest in and grow old ones, we are all supposed to be terrified, always and everywhere, about getting a cold. Nature is our enemy. Brian is speechless, literally. He notes that this is applied behavioral science and an attack on the public, which it clearly is. Meanwhile, tool Boris is saying that there’s no danger of a second peak that could overwhelm the NHS.

Mike then looks at an open letter that was published on the BMJ. It addresses the politicians. The ‘professionals’ are warning that a second wave is on the way. (Of course it is. It was, as James Corbett put it, baked into the hoax. As Monica Perez told James, they’ve come too far to quit now. And there’s TONS of money to be made. And they’ve already invested BILLIONS of dollars in vaccines and the evil tech surrounding this Rockefeller healthcare hell.) The article notes that “A public inquiry into the UK’s response to covid-19 now seems inevitable, with political and public demands for one that can command widespread support. While a comprehensive inquiry at some point will be essential, the traditional model, as used with Bloody Sunday or the Iraq war, takes years. We do not have time. With some of the highest death rates anywhere and clear problems in implementing an effective, joined-up response, the UK needs answers within months, before a second wave develops.”

Wouldn’t it be nice if those capitalists and their political tools didn’t think it was okay to murder people for profit? The lockdown has resulted in much death (far outpacing deaths [seemingly] from covid 19) with more to come in the following years. Then there’s the apparently premeditated murder of patients/victims of those who are trying to ruin the good reputation of HCQ. In that regard see my previous post. Does the obscene immunity from liability given to vaccine companies extend to murders committed by ‘professionals’ doing trials with cheap drugs that they want to make appear bad?

Mike Robinson

Mike thinks that with the future waves (which the emerging global biosecurity police State requires for it to work properly and profitably), we will see lockdowns in regions only. So you’ll see a county lockdown here, a city lockdown there, etc.. Perhaps. Brian reminds his audience that a couple of politicians about 5 years ago warned that the Tories planned to introduce a period of creative destruction. (We are familiar with that nonsense here in Ontario, Canada. Interestingly, finding this article was difficult. Leftwing orgs in Canada have mostly gone righwing. A search on The Council of Canadians website for “John Snobelen” was not productive. Same for The Centre for Policy Alternatives, which is where this article apparently originates. Go figure.) Did the Tories, then, know even then that covid 1984 was on the TCC’s menu?

Brian Gerrish

Brian then directs viewers to the awful BBC and an article titled “Coronavirus: How New Zealand got its coffees and fries back.” Back to normal eh? Right. Fast garbage food. Low paying employers. Of course, it now comes with a heap of abuse as “New Zealand’s top health expert warned against people congregating outside public spaces.” Being human is on the way out, like nature. Big Pharma and manmade chemicals are in. God and his creation can go to hell. He did get the message, losers.

a gangster politician

Brian takes the article apart very skillfully, noting that besides the unsupported claim by the reporter reporting that the main thing on New Zealanders’ minds after (?) the lockdown was coffees and fries from large chains, No mention is made of small businesses because, Why mention your victims? The article is seeded with doctors who are there, apparently, to give the article gravitas. Here’s some additional images in connection with this article, showing what the UKC presenters think of it:

Brian thinks he found the ‘doctor’ named Samantha Keene (See below). And then there’s Dr Ashley Bloomfield, who is quoted as though he was one of the doctors standing in the queue waiting for his healthy food, but he wasn’t one of those people. It turns out that he just likes attention and others are happy to give it to him, for their own purposes. He’s actually the doctor in charge of New Zealand’s lockdown abuse. While he was identified as such, it was done very casually and in that regard, Brian notes that he actually missed the fact on his first reading of the article. Brian asks whether the article is the reporting of news or the creation of news that then gets reported as though it was genuine. He thinks that it’s the latter, as do I.

Here’s a couple of the final images from the awful propaganda piece, which attempts to teach citizens that they should leave themselves in the caring arms of the Corporatocracy State and not think, let alone resist. People are to obey and nothing more:

Brian notes that UK citizens being abused by their government aren’t even being shown the courtesy that the worst offenders in prison are shown. They are told right away how long they will be locked up for so that they know. It may not make them happy, but to not know creates anxiety and worry and is cruel.

Brian notes that the Behavioral Insights Team has not got back to the UKC with any sort of reply to the UKC’s email requesting information in regard to their plan to cause fear among the public and whether they did a risk assessment of the impacts that that would have on mentally challenged people. Surprise, surprise.

The presenters then show a clip of Matt Hancock announcing cheerily that they will be stockpiling covid 19 vaccines (I assume) even without those vaccines having received approval. What is the nature of the deal that AstraZeneca struck with the UK government?, Mike asks. We get a clue from someone who clued the UKC in to a bill that is in the process of being pushed through and it includes (besides all kinds of goodies for Rockefeller health care) an obscene provision for companies like AstraZeneca to crank out products even though proper trials and subsequent approvals have not been carried out. The bill gives the government the power to pass laws on the fly (which are therefore more like arbitrary rules), skipping genuine parliamentary examination and discussion, in order to enable companies like AstraZeneca to carry on with their awful business. It’s called Corporatocracy for a reason. Official government is a charade.

Vanessa Beeley

The presenters intended to have Vanessa Beeley on the show, but ran into some technical problems (not specified) and couldn’t manage that. But some of the things that they would have discussed with Vanessa included reporting the fact that Israel is bombing Syria, just because. As Mike notes, there is no comment, internationally, about this criminality. They are hacking at Syria and it is expected that it will result in the balkanization of Syria. With everyone focussed on covid 19, this sort of criminality is just too tempting for the US’s proxies. There was also this report:

“Trump ordered US Forces to Burn Hectares of Wheat Field in Syria amid CoVID-19 Pandemic:Russia Media” by Johnlee Varghese (International Business Times). An excerpt follows:

=== =
Days after Syria alleged that the American occupation forces in the country burned large areas of wheat crop fields, a report now has emerged that the destroying of the food crop was carried out by the US forces on the orders sanctioned by President Donald Trump.

The report titled Confirmed Trump Ordered Syria’s Wheat Crop Burning During Pandemic claimed that the US forces were carrying out the orders that were sanctioned by The White House. President Donald Trump had signed the orders for the burning of agriculture lands in Syria.
= ===

Make sure that you social distance you starving Syrians!

The Presenters then look at a Reuters article titled “Syrian Kurdish authorities to stop wheat going to govt territory,” by Rodi Said and Ellen Francis. The Kurds, like the Israelis, are nothing but trouble. (The traitorous Kurdish leadership is no good for Kurds and nothing but trouble for those whose territories they move into. They just can’t say thank you to anyone for allowing them to move into their national borders. Yes, Turkey has treated them badly. But, sorry Noam, they have no excuse for causing trouble. Syria is down and there’s the Kurds within Syria kicking it.)

James Corbett

The presenters note the continuing belligerence of the US toward China and Russia, with US officials calling those two superpowers a threat. The only threat that Russia and China pose to the US is in the area of leadership of the Corporatocracy. From the US’s standpoint, that would be true even if Russian and Chinese leaders didn’t want that leadership position. It’s always been the ‘natural’ outlook of the warmongering American ruling class, as the late historian Richard Walton explains. For a fact, as James Corbett points out, the real threat comes from all of these ruling classes as they take counterrevolution to the next level. (Along the same lines, the old, upright, Noam Chomsky explained that Cold War is essentially class war, or war against the people. See “Cold War Means, Mainly, Class War.”) Counterrevolution is war against the people. James doesn’t use the term ‘counterrevolution’, but I do because that’s what this sort of war on the people is. (James calls it World War III.) It’s now much more. It’s war against nature and God, who created the natural world, including us. And it’s Gog’s attack on everyone, but having as its main focus God’s loyal worshippers who uphold God’s standards rather than trample them and spit on God.

Giorgio Agamben

Everyone, good and bad, lies, but God’s loyal followers don’t. Think about what that means in the context of the emerging global biosecurity police State which will still be Corporatocracy but with an orientation toward security, via medical martial law, for the State that comes at the expense of citizens’ rights. When the authorities ask me whether I’m coughing, an evil, dangerous thing now, I can’t just lie and say “No, I’m fine.” I can protest that I’m under the weather and have a cold but am otherwise fine. But that’s not how the fascist authorities will treat my normal, non-life-threatening illness, unless I’m someone with the ‘right’ views who may have some role to play in propping up such a Satanic system. This is why the prophet Ezekiel, who prophesied Gog’s attack (chapters 38 & 39) notes that his forces, Gog’s Crowd, go after ‘those without bars and doors’. We have no worldly protection. That’s the fatal mistake that Gog’s Crowd makes. Gog may want to avoid his fate, but he can’t out-manuever God. That is why the prophet Ezekiel makes it clear that God takes control and ‘puts hooks in Gog’s jaws and brings him to his end’. (Exercise caution. That can be misunderstood. Gog, whose name probably means ‘darkness’, isn’t destroyed in Armageddon, but that will come eventually.)

We are to have all of our human rights – informed consent, the right to physical security, the right to know what the authorities are doing in our name, the right to freedom of movement – completely removed and replaced with obligations to the State seen by the State as being met only when we completely acquiesce to its demands. (Cattle won’t notice. They can be told that being slaughtered and eaten is good for them and they’ll nod and bow down so that their heads can be chopped off, as they are doing now.) We are destined, in the super limited view of those humans seeking to replace God, to be slaves who will be absolutely controlled and altered, via technology, and capable of being literally turned off remotely if we don’t perform satisfactorily, which will be quite possible once we have been uploaded to the cloud (their computers) which is their stated intention.

Brian again asks the right questions – in regard to the US’s attempt to drag China into talks about disarmament when China is in fact very behind the US in weapons production and nuclear armaments – about who is in charge of these governments. The US rhetoric is that China is hiding behind its great wall of secrecy, implying that it’s rapidly building up its arsenal of weapons of mass destruction with evil intent (while the US happily rolls out 5G equipment supplied by China). The rhetoric disguises the fact the US admires and adopts China’s authoritarian methods. That was made clear years ago by Naomi Klein (who has gone over to the dark side since.)

Peter Phillips and Maximilian C. Forte

Those who are actually in charge of Corporatocracy governments are corporations and powerful investors, hence the name “Corporatocracy.” The same superclass that is trying to massively expand the market for pharmaceuticals and vaccines (page 59 of Peter Phillips’s book, “Giants”) also wants to protect and expand the market for war and war preparation (page 59 of Peter Phillip’s book, “Giants”). Sabre-rattling is necessary. Citizens must be bamboozled into believing that when the State robs them in order to beef up ‘defense’, it’s for their protection. China’s own weapons production (which I know nothing about other than that it not at all on the scale of US weapons production) must be an area that the TCC invests in, but in this case it appears that by investors’ calculations the more profitable American-based weapons makers must be given optimal conditions (propaganda about evil superpowers, which in fact are evil, but set that aside) for their preservation and growth. As well, Taking the propaganda out of the picture would destroy the whole racket. (In other words, even with a genetically modified [soon], compliant/terrified and controlled [largely and ramping up] world population, elites still feel the need to pitch to it. I guess that ‘God’ can’t just snap his finger.) You have to have powerful enemies for the ‘defense’ scam to work… (See “NATO is a BIG Problem.”) And then there’s the element of white supremacy here (which doesn’t seem to bother tools like BLM). I take Maximilian Forte’s point about how dominant the US is within the TTC. Of course it is! (Brian noted that the collusion between the US and the UK is very evident. Jehovah’s Witnesses got it right when they identified the seventh dominant world power symbolized by the seventh head of the wild beast as being the dual Anglo-American world power.) That’s why I call it the America-led Corporatocracy. Maximilian Forte: “…Phillips’ model is largely correct, but it is also important to remember that the wealthiest, most numerous, and most powerful membership of the “transnational” capitalist class is in fact American.” (See “Global Giants: American Empire and Transnational Capital” by Maximilian Forte) Max’s view is more focussed, here, on labelling than that which is being labelled. (So, Just call it the ‘American-led Corporatocracy’ or the ‘American-led Transnational Capitalist Class’. Even better, Call it the “Anglo/American Transnational Capitalist Class.”)

The show continues in this vein until its conclusion and so I’m going to end my commentary here.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Covid 19 – The Character Of The Transnational Capitalist Class

Jesus Christ talked about bad people and how to spot them. He stated: “Be on the watch for false prophets who come to you in sheep’s covering, but inside they are ravenous wolves. By their fruits you will recognize them.” – Matthew 7:15,16a. This is the meaning behind the mark of the beast, which the (Christian) Bible book of Revelation talks about at chapter 13, verses 16-18. People who read the Bible without guidance (holy spirit and other) have tied themselves into knots trying to explain the mark of the beast (below) as though the Bible itself doesn’t explain it. When you see ‘how’ somehow behaves, that too tells you something about that person. If that person robs you, with malice and unnecessarily, then you know that he or she is a thief, a bad thing. If that person (or group) kills others, then that person (or group) is a murderer and a bad person. A murderer is like the thorn bush that cannot produce grapes, which is an illustration that Jesus goes on to give in the above passage at Matthew. Your actions tells others ‘who’ you are.

Incidentally, There are victims of the Transnational Capitalist Class, and their kind, and then there are victims. We in the West are getting ‘the treatment’ right now. Until now, most of us have been fairly free to go about our often miserable and sometimes decent lives unmolested. But there have always been those, namely Gazans, Yemenis, Syrians, Egyptians, Iranians and before them, South and Central Americans, not to mention Africans, dealing with slavers and US-imposed police States and their death squads, who have seen firsthand what those who own and rule the world are.

Getting the slave’s mark, or brand, of 666 means that you have both chosen to be bad, to worship the wild beast and the invisible power behind it, namely Satan, aka Devil, aka Gog, and to do the things that bad people who follow, willingly, the authorities who run this beastly system of things, do. If, even though you can see that the authorities who own, rule and ruin the world clearly stand in opposition to Jehovah God, you choose to support them anyway, then you are showing onlookers ‘who’ you are. The gangster politicians (and corporate media, judges, police, militaries, etc), and their rich, powerful masters, are clearly opposed to goodness (the true God’s standards). The number 3 is used in the Bible to symbolize emphasis. The number 10 is used to symbolize fullness. (The ten diadems on the crowns of the human, political wild beast of Revelation chapter 13 mean that it will be allowed to fully manifest so that the lesson, or issue of universal sovereignty, can be learned and then the case brought to a conclusion). The number 6 is used to symbolize missing the mark from God’s standpoint. (I believe that the number 7 is used to symbolize hitting the mark from God’s standpoint, so a seven-head beast that gets its authority from the “dragon,” aka Satan, presents confusing symbology, if that’s right.) That’s all that 666 means. Clearly, Members of the Transnational Capitalist Class, and management of the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), have accepted the mark of the beast. I personally may not ‘physically’ survive Armageddon, which it looks like we are rolling into, but those who have received the mark of the beast – which you can only receive willingly – will neither ‘spiritually’ nor ‘physically’ survive Armageddon. They will be destroyed both body and soul if they live to see Armageddon. (They have invested everything – their souls – in this Godless system of things, and that means that if this system of things is destroyed, then they will be destroyed along with it.) If it were otherwise, there’d be no God of love. A God of love would not permit, forever, beastly humans to roam the planet terrorizing, plundering and destroying. The arriving bio-security global police State will not last long and that’s good news.

“Face Masks Have Put Us In A State” by Iain Davis (Off Guardian)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

Face masks must be worn in the UK on public transport (to begin with) by order of the State. We will explore the reasons why people might comply or resist this diktat. What reasons are there to wear a face mask, do they make sense and what does our compliance or resistance say about us?…

People who believe in the State are called statists. Those who don’t, broadly come under the umbrella term anarchists. For statists, the anarchist is despised. Life without their State is unimaginable, therefore those who wish to live without it must be evil. The anarchist has long been reviled by statists as the dangerous subversive.

Despite the perpetual myth that “anarchy” is synonymous with “chaos,” that is not what anarchy means. Anarchy encompasses a broad range of political, economic and sociological perspectives with one commonality. The State is considered both harmful and unnecessary.

For statists an absence of the State must mean “chaos.” A free for all with no law, no social security, no healthcare, no infrastructure and mob rule. This is the opposite of anarchy. Anarchy is not society without rules. It is society without rulers…

All religions have their representatives. There are cardinals, bishops, imams and and rabbi’s etc. They are perhaps the leading voices, but they aren’t the only representatives. There are envoys, missionaries, TV evangelists, religious correspondents and so on.

The State is no different. We have politicians and governmental advisers, as the leading voices, but there are also NGO spokespersons, union officials, the academic & scientific orthodoxy, lords and ladies, multinational CEO’s, central bankers, business leaders and more. Of these, the most powerful, in terms of their ability to shape public opinion are the mainstream media (MSM.)

The core tenet of the statist’s faith is that a small group of people are best placed to tell all the other people what to do. This is a belief in absolute hierarchical authority…

Generally in life we cede our authority to others on a case by case basis. Our authority, in all other decisions, remains otherwise intact. We retain our individual sovereignty.

Most people understand this. We can become defensive, even aggressive, if we feel someone else is telling us what to do when we haven’t given them our specific authority to do so.

Yet for some reason, when it comes to the State, statists give this group of people absolute authority over every aspect of, not only their own, but everyone’s lives. Just as religion is often based upon a belief in supreme beings, who have power or influence over the devotee’s life, so statism accepts that special “selected” people have power and influence over the every aspect of the statist’s life…

The State’s authority comes entirely from the statist. Without their belief it would be nothing. Regardless of any other competing ideologies statists may follow, a trust in the legitimacy of absolute hierarchical authority is universal.

This trust is not shared by the anarchist. Power corrupts absolutely, in the anarchists view, and history demonstrates it…

The State doesn’t just take our money to build roads and hospitals. Absolute hierarchical authority over everything leads to nothing but corruption, oppression and war. We know this, history teaches us this fact. Yet we still persist with the idea that if we just vote harder next time it won’t happen again.

It is beyond ironic that the statist will often chide the anarchist for, what they see as, their naive perception of human nature. Statists claim that it is inevitable that the corrupt, the violent and the unworthy will seek and exploit power. Precisely the point made by anarchists, who suggest that not freely giving away your authority to the power crazed might therefore be a good idea…

While nearly everyone in the UK would say it is morally indefensible to use physical force to make someone do whatever you tell them, it is surprising how many think it’s OK for a tiny group of people in Westminster, Holyrood, The Senned and Stormont to use physical force, or the threat of it, to control millions. Cognitive dissonance exemplified.

Nonetheless, it is what it is. If you need to take the bus or the train to work you are now forced to wear a face mask. Not because you believe there’s any point to it, but because you won’t be able to get to work and feed your family otherwise.

So, if we are honest with ourselves, unless convinced by the science, we will wear a face mask on public transport for two reasons. We are either happy to accept that special people we’ve never met have sole authority to tell us what to do, as a slave owner would command a willing slave, or we are scared that they will use force to punish or harm us if we don’t comply. We call this a free and open democratic State…

The final reason you might elect to wear a face mask is that you are convinced by the scientific evidence. You believe that donning a cheap or homemade face mask will protect you and others from a disease which you have a 0.45% chance of contracting and a 99.94% chance of surviving.

Why you would imagine that the science shows that wearing a crappy face mask will stave off the minuscule threat of infection is difficult to say. For many, perhaps it is because that is what the mainstream media (an organ of the State) told them. However, the State has said other things at other times…

As usual, times are going to be tough for the majority but multinational corporations are going to do very well out of it. If you think about it, this might make you angry. Therefore, your blind faith in your representative leaders matters a great deal to the State.

As the situation deteriorates, through necessity, people are going to resist. Controlling the statist majority, through fear, is vital for the high priesthood of the State to maintain their illegitimate claims to the moral high ground.

Comically, the MSM propaganda machine insist all this devastation is due to the impact of coronavirus. Of course it isn’t. It is entirely a result of the State’s deliberate lockdown policy decisions…

Complacency, as far as the State is concerned, is not unquestioningly believing everything they tell you. If you don’t accept their narrative, if you reject their edicts and have no faith in their authority, then you are ‘complacent.’ The State’s way is the only way. This is not a tolerant religion.

The Corporatocracy State, of which the UK State is a part, is a terrifying wild beast. We can’t slay it. We can’t slay it and we can’t slay sin, and the consequences of sin, namely death, disease, crime, inequality etc.. That will take a higher power and we make a fatal mistake thinking that we are the highest power and that if we don’t fix things, then they won’t get fixed. We make a fatal mistake in being faithless. And I am not arguing for not caring and just sitting back and watching monsters destroy. There’s not much that I can do to resist, being penniless and without much in the way of friends and family support, but what I can do (this blog, my conversations with the few people who will listen, and my doctored mask), I do.

Jon Rappoport

“To US Attorney General: hydroxychloroquine clinical trials intentionally murdering people?” by Jon Rappoport (Jon Rappoport’s Blog)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

Mr Barr: You must look into this one. Yesterday. Set your hounds loose.

Summary: Several clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have been administering huge doses of the drug to COVID patients—doses that can easily be lethal.

Obviously, if the inexpensive HCQ is said to fail, and is called dangerous, then it is sidelined, in favor of far more expensive (and profitable) drugs. And the promised vaccine has a clear field as the only “reasonable strategy against the pandemic.” Meaning: sky-high profits for the manufacturers. Get it?

Bill Gates et al have no problem with murder. This is very premeditated. It’s astonishing. And the cattle shuffle to and fro and give ‘me’ embarrassed and hostile glances.

As for William Barr, Does he actually have to be pushed to investigate this? Actually, The proper question is, Can he be pushed to investigate this? I think we all know that, like his boss, he’s just a tool. He’s totally on board with the rolling out of the bio-security-oriented global Police State as his musings on pre-crime reveal. That doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t ask him what he’s going to do here. I just don’t think that that’s going to make any difference.

https://ahrp.org/covid-19-has-turned-public-health-into-a-lethal-patient-killing-experimental-endeavor/ Jon links to the article, by Dr. Meryl Nass, exposing the serious crimes of individuals within WHO looked at here. Her article is titled “Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health Into a Lethal, Patient-Killing Experimental Endeavor.” It’s actually hard to tell where Dr Nass’s article begins and the introduction, by someone, ends. Here’s a few snippets from that article:

===== =
What is a toxic dose? All experts agree. “… chloroquine has a small toxic to therapeutic margin,” according to Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. It is very safe when used correctly in the right patients, but a bit more can potentially kill. Prof. Nicholas White, who attended both WHO consultations on the chloroquines, has mentioned this.

The WHO hired a consultant to explore the toxicity of hydroxychloroquine in 1979. The consultant, H. Weniger, looked at 335 episodes of adult poisoning by chloroquine drugs. Weniger on page 5 notes that a single dose of 1.5-2 grams of hydroxychloroquine base “may be fatal.”

The Recovery trial used 1.860 grams hydroxychloroquine base (equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine) in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill, hospitalized Covid-19 patients, a potentially lethal dose.

The dose used in the Recovery trial is not recommended for therapy of any medical condition, which I confirmed with Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacology textbook, the drug’s label, and the online medical encyclopedia UptoDate.

This excessive dose apparently continues to be used in WHO Solidarity trials in countries around the world. It appears that the Solidarity trials are not testing the benefits of HCQ on Covid-19, but rather testing whether patients tolerate toxic, nontherapeutic doses.

The WHO Solidarity trials, in order to rapidly enroll patients and spare clinicians a lot of paperwork, collect only limited information on side effects. No information has yet been provided regarding causes of death in the completed hydroxychloroquine arm of the Recovery trial, in which 396 patients died.

The Solidarity trial design being employed by WHO may help obscure whether mortality is due to drug toxicity (in which case, one would expect cause of death to be arrhythmias such as torsade de points, neuropsychiatric effects, or hypoglycemia) versus Covid-19.

The WHO report of its meeting on chloroquine dosing states,

“Although the preponderance of opinion tilted towards a reasonable benefit risk profile for the intervention, there was some scepticism about what was considered a ‘minimalistic safety data collection’ currently included in the protocol.”

The high dose regimen being used in the Solidarity trials has no medical justification. The trial design, with its limited collection of safety data, may make it more difficult to identify toxic drug effects, compared to standard drug trials. This is entirely unethical.

Excessive dosing makes it impossible to assess therapeutic benefit, if any, of HCQ.

Giving the drug only to hospitalized patients means that the window of time during which HCQ would be expected to provide the most benefit, when viral titers are rising, has passed.

To sum up:

HCQ is being given in non-therapeutic, toxic dose
HCQ is being given too late in the disease course to determine its value against SAR-CoV-2.
Limited safety data in the Solidarity trials serves to protect trial investigators and sponsors from disclosure of adverse drug effects, including death
I suspect WHO has been deliberately misleading regarding the doses chosen.
The conclusions to be drawn are frightening:
a) WHO and other national health agencies, and charities, have designed huge clinical trials to assure that hydroxychloroquine will fail to show benefit, presumably to advantage its much more expensive competitor(s) and vaccines in development.
b) In so doing, these agencies and charities have conspired to increase the number of deaths in these trials.
c) In so doing, they have conspired to deprive billions of people from potentially benefiting from a safe and inexpensive drug during a major pandemic. This could lead to prolongation of the pandemic and many increased cases and deaths.

My recommendation is for WHO to immediately stop using this dosing schedule, give trial subjects clinically appropriate doses, and collect more complete safety data. I would remind WHO that if the consent forms fail to inform patients that the dose of HCQ they may receive is much higher than for any other indication, that WHO may be subject to legal action for injuries incurred in its sham of a clinical trial.
= =====

Dr Meryl Nass gets 10 out of 10 for that alert. But she gets 0 out of 10 for pushing the idea that this pandemic is real. In the above quote, you’ll see “In so doing, they have conspired to deprive billions of people from potentially benefiting from a safe and inexpensive drug during a major pandemic. This could lead to prolongation of the pandemic and many increased cases and deaths.” my bolding

“The 5 Biggest Scandals [so far] Of The Coronavirus Response” by Jefferey Jaxen (The Highwire)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

::: :: :
Much of the developed world is facing a long, hot ‘summer of the mask,’ as politicians and public officials bring down new orders to cover the faces of their populations.

A sanity-seeking public has mostly been met with “facts” that shift daily and politicized science that leaves core truths elusive. There have been scandals that spur questions about what is really happening behind this extended virus campaign. Clearing the air of the smokescreen of fear and narrative-driven headlines, major mishandling and open fraud have been smeared across the coronavirus landscape.

Here are just five scandals to consider:

Early in the pandemic, testing was the cornerstone of information gathering to understand more about Covid-19. The race was to see how many antibody tests governments could throw at their populations.

Yet issues emerged almost immediately, according to The Telegraph, as both the UK’s The Department of Health and Social Care and Public Health England each confirmed double-counting of tests…

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recently updated ‘Interim Guidelines for Covid-19 Testing’ immediately raised eyebrows. Early on, the public was told that greater testing capacity would inform health officials when it was safe to restart the economy, get back to school and get on with life. Buuuut….Not so fast! Now, according to the CDC:

“Serologic test results should not be used to make decisions about grouping persons residing in or being admitted to congregate settings, such as schools, dormitories, or correctional facilities…Serologic test results should not be used to make decisions about returning persons to the workplace.”

But at least the tests are accurate right? Uh…

Thousands of deaths in New York nursing homes are direct fallout from Gov. Cuomo’s orders and have been nothing short of devastating. NY Post columnist Michael Goodwin wrote that the nursing homes were ‘killing fields.’ A March 25 directive, which has since been scrubbed from the New York State health department’s website, directed nursing homes to pack residents in without knowing or being able to determine their virus status…

The world all but shut the door on hydroxychloroquine after The Lancet published its now infamous study claiming the common drug was decreasing patient survival and leading to “increased frequency of ventricular arrhythmias.”

A medical community freely prescribing nearly six million doses per year of hydroxychloroquine pre-coronavirus suddenly became concerned about the drug’s adverse effects. The World Health Organization (WHO) instantly turned its back on the drug, shutting down its global trials midstream.

But hold the press! The Lancet was forced, due to the global, open source efforts of public investigation, to retract the paper…

We’ve saved the best/worst for last! Who could forget Neil Ferguson, author of the largest failed model in the world?

Imperial College of London’s Neil Ferguson used old, poorly crafted coding, described as ‘sim city without the graphics’ to extrapolate that millions may die from the coronavirus early on. Variations inside the model were so large one could drive a lorry through them. Ferguson’s fouled-up predictions were incorporated by both the U.S. and UK to justify lockdowns and other suffocating measures populations are still wrestling to remove to this day.
: :: :::

I have questions about the nursing home story. But let’s set that aside. I would have liked to see ‘fake pandemic’ on this list. There is NO pandemic.

“The “Deadly” Hydroxychloroquine Publishing Scandal” by Elizabeth Woodworth (Off Guardian)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

A publishing scandal recently erupted around the use of the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to treat Covid 19. It is also known as quinine and chloroquine, and is on the WHO list of essential medicines.

The bark of the South American quina-quina tree has been used to treat malaria for 400 years. Quinine, a generic drug costing pennies a dose, is available for purchase online. In rare cases it can cause dizziness and irregular heartbeat.

In late May, 2020, The Lancet published a four-author study claiming that HCQ used in hospitals to treat Covid-19 had been shown conclusively to be a hazard for heart death. The data allegedly covered 96,000 patients in 671 hospitals on six continents.

After the article had spent 13 days in the headlines, dogged by scientific objections, three of the authors retracted it on June 5.

Meanwhile, during an expert closed-door meeting leaked May 24 in France, The Lancet and NEJM editors explained how financially powerful pharmaceutical players were “criminally” corrupting medical science to advance their interests…

As a Canadian health sciences librarian who delivered statistics to a large public health agency for 25 years, I sensed almost immediately that the article had to be flawed…

How did this fraud get past The Lancet reviewers in the first place?

The answer emerges from what has remained an obscure French interview, although it has been quoted in the alternative media.

On May 24, a closed-door Chatham House expert meeting about Covid included the editors-in-chief of The Lancet and the NEJM. Comments regarding the article were leaked to the French press by a well-known health figure, Dr. Philippe Douste-Blazy,[xvii] who felt compelled to blow the whistle.

His resulting BFM TV interview was posted to YouTube with English subtitles on May 31, but it was not picked up by the English-speaking media.

These were The Lancet editor Dr. Richard Horton’s words, as reported by Dr. Douste-Blazy:

If this continues, we are not going to be able to publish any more clinical research data because pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today, and are able to use such methodologies as to have us accept papers which are apparently methodologically perfect, but which, in reality, manage to conclude what they want to conclude.”

The scientific process of building a trustworthy knowledge base is one of the foundations of our civilization. Violating this process is a crime against both truth and humanity.

“Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health into a Patient-Killing Experiment” by Catte Black (Off Guardian)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

Potentially lethal doses of the therapeutic drug hydroxychloroquine are being administered in ‘clinical trials’, sometimes without patient consent. Nearly a quarter of those participating in one such trial subsequently died.

From the beginning of the SARS-COV-2/COVID19 pandemic rollout there have been disturbing hints, rumours and even overt whistleblower claims of seemingly gross medical malpractice connected with the treatment and handling of allegedly infected people.

We have heard about mandatory Do Not Resuscitate orders issued for the elderly, cognitively challenged people, autistic people and even children with fairly minor congenital conditions.

We have heard of terrifyingly inappropriate usage of invasive ventilation that can only increase the numbers of covid19 deaths’, and of general levels of incompetence and poor practice that must have the same result.

And now we have evidence of three clinical trials which require patients to be given up to 4 times the normal dosage of hydroxychloroquine, with or without their consent. In one of these studies over 25% of patients died.

This has been unearthed by Dr. Meryl Nass MD, and is covered in detail over at her site and at the Alliance for Human Research Protection, a site dedicated to exposing unethical practice in the medical community…

But something truly grotesque and potentially evil is going on here, and we can’t afford to ignore it.


“Nearly Half of Americans Consider Selling Home as Shutdown Crushes Finances” by ? (ZeroHedge via ANTI-EMPIRE)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

As the virus pandemic has metastasized into an economic downturn, tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs and are struggling to service mortgage payments.

New research offers a glimpse into struggling households, discovers out of the 2,000 American homeowners polled, over half (52%) of respondents say they’re routinely worried about making future mortgage payments and nearly half (47%) considered selling their home because of the inability to service mortgage payments.

The study, conducted by OnePoll and the National Association of Realtors, determined 81% of respondents had experienced unexpected financial stress due to the virus-induced recession. Over half (56%) reduced spending so they could service mortgage payments.

Since mid-March, or about the time when the lockdowns began, nearly half (47%) of homeowners have explored alternative ways of making money. About two-thirds of respondents (64%) started side projects, while 53% sold valuables to supplement income.

“America’s Own Color Revolution” by F. William Engdahl (Global Research)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

If we step back from the immediate issue of videos showing a white Minneapolis policeman pressing his knee on the neck of a black man, George Floyd, and look at what has taken place across the nation since then, it is clear that certain organizations or groups were well-prepared to instrumentalize the horrific event for their own agenda.

The protests since May 25 have often begun peacefully only to be taken over by well-trained violent actors. Two organizations have appeared regularly in connection with the violent protests—Black Lives Matter and Antifa (USA). Videos show well-equipped protesters dressed uniformly in black and masked (not for coronavirus to be sure), vandalizing police cars, burning police stations, smashing store windows with pipes or baseball bats. Use of Twitter and other social media to coordinate “hit-and-run” swarming strikes of protest mobs is evident.

What has unfolded since the Minneapolis trigger event has been compared to the wave of primarily black ghetto protest riots in 1968. I lived through those events in 1968 and what is unfolding today is far different. It is better likened to the Yugoslav color revolution that toppled Milosevic in 2000.

F. William Engdahl’s article is very detailed and should disabuse any knowledgeable reader of the idea that Black Lives Matter matters to people who believe in equality, democracy and peace and security for ‘all’. The weakness with Engdahl’s commentary is his ideological bent. He plays the Left versus Right game and gets it wrong. (David Scott of the UK Column News shows does this as well. It’s very common.) Engdahl’s ‘far Left’ is Right. But when you’ve branded yourself rightwing, or Conservative (usually the same thing) and invested in that ideology, you don’t want to call the fake Left out for being Left because you don’t want competition. You don’t want people to ask “Okay. What’s the ‘real’ Left all about?”

Also, In his article, Engdahl refers to Srđa Popović, but only refers to him by his last name. He’s a real trouble-maker that one. He is an expert in color revolutions, a fantastic Corporatocracy asset.

John Whitehead

“Government Eyes Are Watching You: We Are All Prisoners Of The Surveillance State” by John Whitehead (The Rutherford Institute)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

First broadcast in America 50 years ago, The Prisoner—a dystopian television series described as “James Bond meets George Orwell filtered through Franz Kafka”—confronted societal themes that are still relevant today: the rise of a police state, the freedom of the individual, round-the-clock surveillance, the corruption of government, totalitarianism, weaponization, group think, mass marketing, and the tendency of humankind to meekly accept their lot in life as a prisoner in a prison of their own making.

Perhaps the best visual debate ever on individuality and freedom, The Prisoner (17 episodes in all) centers around a British secret agent who abruptly resigns only to find himself imprisoned and interrogated in a mysterious, self-contained, cosmopolitan, seemingly tranquil retirement community known only as the Village. The Village is an idyllic setting with parks and green fields, recreational activities and even a butler.

While luxurious and resort-like, the Village is a virtual prison disguised as a seaside paradise: its inhabitants have no true freedom, they cannot leave the Village, they are under constant surveillance, their movements are tracked by surveillance drones, and they are stripped of their individuality and identified only by numbers…

As journalist Scott Thill concludes for Wired, “Rebellion always comes at a price. During the acclaimed run of The Prisoner, Number Six is tortured, battered and even body-snatched: In the episode ‘Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling,’ his mind is transplanted to another man’s body. Number Six repeatedly escapes The Village only to be returned to it in the end, trapped like an animal, overcome by a restless energy he cannot expend, and betrayed by nearly everyone around him.”

The series is a chilling lesson about how difficult it is to gain one’s freedom in a society in which prison walls are disguised within the trappings of technological and scientific progress, national security and so-called democracy.

As Thill noted when McGoohan died in 2009, “The Prisoner was an allegory of the individual, aiming to find peace and freedom in a dystopia masquerading as a utopia.”

The Prisoner’s Village is also an apt allegory for the American Police State: it gives the illusion of freedom while functioning all the while like a prison: controlled, watchful, inflexible, punitive, deadly and inescapable.

The American Police State, much like The Prisoner’s Village, is a metaphorical panopticon, a circular prison in which the inmates are monitored by a single watchman situated in a central tower. Because the inmates cannot see the watchman, they are unable to tell whether or not they are being watched at any given time and must proceed under the assumption that they are always being watched.

Eighteenth century social theorist Jeremy Bentham envisioned the panopticon prison to be a cheaper and more effective means of “obtaining power of mind over mind, in a quantity hitherto without example.”

Bentham’s panopticon, in which the prisoners are used as a source of cheap, menial labor, has become a model for the modern surveillance state in which the populace is constantly being watched, controlled and managed by the powers-that-be and funding its existence.

Nowhere to run and nowhere to hide: this is the new mantra of the architects of the police state and their corporate collaborators (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google, YouTube, Instagram, etc.)…

Apart from the obvious dangers posed by a government that feels justified and empowered to spy on its people and use its ever-expanding arsenal of weapons and technology to monitor and control them, we’re approaching a time in which we will be forced to choose between obeying the dictates of the government—i.e., the law, or whatever a government official deems the law to be—and maintaining our individuality, integrity and independence.

John Whitehead quotes Glenn Greenwald, who makes the correct observation that governments were once comprised of public servants and the public could know what government was doing with taxpayers’ dollars, whereas citizens were private citizens and governments couldn’t pry into every aspect of their lives. That’s been flipped around. John Ralston Saul made the same point but I can’t find the quote. What do they expect? It’s a free universe. We can self-modify into believers in inequality, deceit and violence and many of us do. Those who self-modify that way come to rule via strategic rule-breaking. It’s a free universe but it’s not one where we are free from consequences. Those, perhaps those who choose to believe that imperfect humankind is God, who choose to believe that crime does pay have no message of hope to impart. My message of hope is that there is a higher power who is not imperfect and he has every intention of acting in full righteousness to establish a human society in which justice is not just here and there and now and again, as it is now. That isn’t favorable to predators, but that is how it should and will be.

“And do not fear those who kill the body, but cannot kill the soul. Rather, fear him who can kill both soul and body in Gehenna. Two sparrows sell for a coin of small value, do they not? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground without your father’s knowledge. But even the hairs of your head are numbered.” – Matthew 10:28-30

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Covid 19 – BLM, George Soros Crap, Color Revolutions

What follows is from the above UK Column News show for June 17, 2020. The presenters are Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson and Alex Thomson.

Paul Delaire Staines

Mike looks at a number of news sources (Daily Express, London Loves Express) that report that the UK is banning gatherings of more than 6 people. Apparently, it’s fake news. It’s secondary legislation originally written on May 31 before people were protesting. Mike notes that it was about relaxing the restrictions (which originally proposed banning gatherings of more than two people!). As a statutory instrument, that legislation doesn’t get too much attention. (The details here completely escape me.) Mike wonders whether the objective was to stir people up more than they are stirred up already. Mike says that he’s surprised that the more knowledgeable Guido Fawkes fell for this, but Alex wonders whether he’s controlled opposition. He notes that he’s rather right of center. Guido Fawkes is Paul Delaire Staines.

Alex Thompson

Regarding the above image, Alex thinks this very much looks like George Soros’s handiwork. You just take a poster that you’re using to stir up trouble in one country, one year, in relation to some matter and change it around a bit and use it for another country, another year, entering the appropriate buzzwords into the boxes in the images.

Then the presenters take another look at hero Patrick Hutchinson, who I looked at in an earlier blog post. Patrick rescued a far-right protester from a mob in London during a BLM protest, according to the online Mail. A viewer sent in a LinkedIn profile of Patrick Hutchinson to the UKC. Mike says that when he saw it he nearly fell off his chair. However, Mike notes that it isn’t one hundred percent confirmed that they have correctly identified Patrick Hutchinson and therefore asks viewers if anyone knows anything. Check out the images:

Is this Patrick Hutchinson, the hero who rescued a far right protester from a mob?

Mike Robinson

As Mike looks through Patrick Hutchinson’s LinkedIn profile, he makes the comment that Universal Private Equity, which Patrick had settled into at one point, has no money. He’s now a personal trainer, which would account for the thinner visage on the right. Interestingly, on the LinkedIn profile that the presenters are examining, under interests, Patrick has a wide range of personal training-related interests. Why did Mike almost fall off his chair? A UKC researcher had earlier dug up a UKC a LinkedIn profile for a BLM manager, David Wilks-Carmichael, who, lo and behold, just happens to be director of Universal Private Equity Limited, connected to the newly incorporated BLM Limited. David Wilks-Carmichael Universal Private Capital PLC, which seems to be some kind of business related to investments, offshore services, aviation, yachting services, and it too appears to have no money. Universal Private Equity has a stake in this company. David Wilks-Carmichael has a whole slew of directorships in this and that, some of which have expired. Most of those companies are still in existence. Who is David Wilks-Carmichael? What is Patrick Hutchinson really all about? Are they intelligence agency-connected? Alex Thomson makes the observation that when you have mathematical ability and have a position in the world of investments and finance, you are so highly valued and rewarded that it is unlikely that you’re going to ditch that for personal training. Which suggests (so far that’s all) that Patrick is simply not who he is pretending to be. Alex also notes that others are suggesting that the two images for Patrick, above, don’t really match. Offhand, I’d agree. That doesn’t, however, mean that there isn’t monkey business going on here and maybe, as Alex suggests, there was even some kind of swictherooney going on there.

The presenter show an article, with a video in which Patrick talks, from the Mirror titled “Black hero Patrick Hutchinson who rescued white protester speaks out for first time.” Apparently, Patrick was with a group called ARK PROTECTION LIMITED and ARK members accompanied Patrick during his rescue, surrounding him as he carried off his white friend. Check it out:

The presenters have all sorts of questions about these characters, Ark Protection and the whole rescue event and so would anyone thoughtful looking at what UKC has revealed so far. Mike says he was reminded of the propaganda construct that is the White Helmets organization, which was (is?) active in Syria aiding the terrorists who were attacking and terrorizing Syrians at the direction (and funding) of Western nations and Gulf State monarchies. Is there an effort here to do something similar with BLM? (I don’t yet see why, although, where we are talking about BLM in the US, Syrian Girl’s latest video, I think, gives us some very interesting information worth pondering. See “WHY BLACK LIVES MATTER IS A COLOUR REVOLUTION.”)

After pondering Syrian Girls latest about the color revolution underway in the US, I decided to offer this comment on her Bitchute channel, which she may or may not see:

))) )) )
What Syrian Girl may be interested in, because while I agree with her that the color revolutionaries are not interested in a new world order that works for everyone (obviously), she seems to have no ideas about exactly what is rolling out here. Or she does have some ideas (She’s too smart to not have any ideas about all of this), but didn’t say much about them in this video. What’s rolling out is not just more police State (as in Corporatocracy police State, since nation States at this point are clearly an illusion, apologies to Maximilian Forte), but a biosecurity-oriented Corporatocracy police State. James Corbett put us onto Giorgio Agamben and Patrick Zilberman. Patrick nails it (from Giorgio’s article, translated by D. Alan Dean, who is on Medium):

“At issue is nothing less than the creation of a sort of “health terror” as an instrument for governing what are called
“worst case scenarios.”…

“Zylberman shows that the apparatus being suggested was articulated in three points: 1) the construction, on the basis of a possible risk, of a fictitious scenario in which data are presented in such a way as to promote behaviors that allow for governing an extreme situation; 2) the adoption of the logic of the worst as a regime of political rationality;
3) the total organization of the body of citizens in a way that strengthens maximum adherence to institutions of government, producing a sort of superlative good citizenship in which imposed obligations are presented as evidence of altruism and the citizen no longer has a right to health (health safety) but becomes juridically obliged to health

Calling Bill Gates’s new world order ‘Covid 1984’ couldn’t be more apt.
( (( (((

The UKC presenters, thinking along the lines that Syrian Girl is thinking, about color revolutions, then shows this image comparing the (probably infiltrated) BLM heroes to Syria’s fake White Helmet heroes:

*edit, June 22, 2020 – I thought I’d watched UK Column News today without blogging about it. That’s what I did, but there was one segment of it that I thought I should call your attention to here, since this post and the UKC show I comment on here deals with Patrick Hutchinson, and the excerpt I’m going to show you of today’s UKC show relates to that story. Have a look:

Deputy Secretary of Defense Patrick M. Shanahan meets with British Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Defence Stephen Lovegrove at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., Mar. 27, 2018. (DoD photo by U.S. Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith)

David Scott wrote a UKC article, titled “Do Veterans’ Lives Matter at the Ministry of Defence?,” in which he reports that Stephen Augustus Lovegrove, the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Defence, “the highest civil servant in the department,” has written a memo to all MOD staff exhorting them to stay strong, as covid 19 impacts BAME (black, asian, minority, ethnic) disproportionately. He improperly, as Alex explains, signs the letter with “Sincerely, Stephen Lovegrove, Permanent Secretary #blacklivesmatter.”

“At the same time, ongoing research on Covid-19 increasingly shows that its deadly impact is felt harder in BAME communities.” – Stephen Lovegrove

David is just as troubled by the UK’s treatment of vets as he is the BLM monkey business here. (I’m troubled by David’s war propaganda and UK exceptionalism.) Clearly, BLM plays a nefarious role in the Corporatocracy State’s current covid 19 pandemic hoax.

Brian shows an image of a Telegraph article, titled “Keep quiet on two-metre rule, Sage experts told,” by Katherine Rushton. The presenters are pleased that The Telegraph finally asked some good questions about the covid 19 rules. From the article:


“A source said: “It has come through SAGE channels as an official request from elsewhere in Government. There is concern that there should only be one public message about the science. But there isn’t such a thing as ‘the science’. There are lots of different sciences.”

“The Government has denied it was an official edict. A spokesperson said: “There is no ban on scientists who provide advice to the government speaking to anyone about their own areas of expertise and academic work.

““We are committed to thorough and transparent debate of all the evidence presented to SAGE and its sub-committees.””

“The Official’s apparent attempt to curb what scientists say in public comes as the Government faces mounting pressure to revise the two metre rule, amid concerns that businesses and schools will not be able to fully reopen whilst it is in place.”

I think that The Telegraph hasn’t even begun to ask important questions about the pandemic hoax and I don’t expect it to. It clearly embraces the idea that the pandemic is real.

The presenters next turn to a Guardian article by David Conn titled “NHS warns betting firms against using ‘reckless’ ads to exploit football’s return,” which looks at Claire Murdoch’s vile finger wagging at the sport betting industry. She warns that they are exploiting “the return of televised football with “reckless” advertising campaigns that could cause more problem gambling while health service resources are stretched responding to the Covid-19 pandemic.” Her government has gone to war against its own citizens, lying to them about a pandemic which doesn’t exist, killing who knows how many UK citizens with absolutely unjustifiable lockdown/lock up orders, creating mental health problems for thousands, including children whose minds are being warped by the idea that being human and living in a physical world is abnormal, and she wags her finger at the sport betting industry. It doesn’t matter whether there’s a grain of truth in her statements, which grain would be in relation to betting addicts (which could be solved with, I don’t know, an economy that worked for everyone maybe). She, along with every politician in the UK and elsewhere, who went along with the huge, harmful and criminal covid 19 pandemic hoax, should go to jail. That won’t happen because there’s too many of them. Gangsters (the transnational capitalist class) own, rule and ruin the world and gangsters like Claire help them to do so. It will take a higher power to deal with this scale of criminality and destruction. Fortunately, seeing how the gangster capitalists have been increasingly vocal, calling to God to “Bring it!,” that is coming.

The presenters then visit the UK gov website where mental health issues, in relation to the ‘pandemic’ are talked about and they show the following, which includes screen grabs from that website:

As the presenters note, the UK gov is there admitting that it’s covid 19 messaging can harm people’s mental health. My take is that it doesn’t change the fact that the UK gov wants people to get its information about covid 19, and everything, from the government and through corporate media. The issue, in other words, is not about quality, but quantity. It’s safe enough for the UK gov (and, according to Alex Thomson, authorities somewhere in the northeast US) to warn people about tv, in my view. They would know that most people are hopelessly addicted to corporate media. There’s little danger that the frightened, obedient majority will decide to question authority and think for itself and, say, examine alternative views. (See my first blog post, of over 40 so far, on the covid 19 pandemic hoax, titled “Corporate Media – A Terrifying Addiction.”

The presenters then look at a UK gov short video presentation that purports to help UK citizens deal with their anxiety over covid 19. If you didn’t know that the UK government was actually deliberately ramping up anxiety and fear among its citizens over covid 19, you’d be right to conclude, upon seeing that video, that it presents a not terribly bad message. But the presenters then show how the intentions of the government here are absolutely evil, just as they have shown us that (in great detail and from UK government documents) on previous UKC shows, many which this blog looked at. Here’s the presenters’ response to the cheery, colorful UK gov video that purports to help UK citizens deal with their anxiety:

Joe Smyser

Brian notes that in the US, they are desperate to control people’s thoughts and behavior around the subject of vaccines because the public’s acceptance of the establishment line on vaccines is diminishing. They look at one scammer, Joe Smyser, who is the CEO of a for profit organization called The Public Good Projects and how he is slavering to make money by covertly propagandizing people back into the pro vaccination crowd. That’s covertly, as in the UK. This is not to be confused with straight forward messaging. This is behind the scenes manipulation, because, you know, democracy is so highly valued and your right to informed consent is cherished. Not. You are not to think. You are to obey. Period. And there will be consequences for not obeying because while we in the West hate our enemy China, we actually love their system, especially the more authoritarian aspects of it. We know that system as China’s ‘social credit’ system. Viewers of the UKC are expressing horror and calling what the UK government and it’s NHS is becoming ‘a Stasi system’. Same thing.

Regarding the above video, The presenter, who refers to ‘social credit’ as ‘sesame credit’, states that deploying social credit in China (which I believe was already in place well before 2020, but I am not an expert here) will not be done via fear. I would say that the only way that you could not fear social credit is if you are mentally and spiritually ruined, which most of the world is.

The presenters then talk about Boris Johnson’s recent statements about a medical treatment, dexamethasone, for covid 19. Of course, in the small video clip that is shown, Boris alludes to a second peak. How many peaks will there be Boris? This, as James Corbett correctly stated some time ago, is baked into the hoax. The people will never be free of the pandemic, or pandemics of any sort, because the pandemic forms a key component in the new biosecurity-oriented Corporatocracy police State / new world order, aka covid 1984, that the (unelected, fascist, criminal, twisted) transnational capitalist class has decreed for the planet.

Boris, for some reason (next paragraph), is attacking hydroxychloroquine and promoting dethamexasone, but the use of either drug to treat seriously ill patients who are close to death does next to no good. The doctors who are recommending and/or using HCQ are recommending and/or using the drug well before patients are critical and so as to keep them from becoming seriously ill and so as to enable them to recover altogether. (Thanks, but I don’t want any toxic drugs for my cold. Again, If you are going to force either DNA-altering – that has been fact-checked – vaccines or else toxic drugs on me, I’ll take the toxic drugs.) Boris is up to no good, but that’s in a politician’s ‘actual’ job description, once you understand that politicians are, usually, gangsters. Boris’s announcement coincides with a UK regulatory agency’s decision to stop its trials for hydroxychloroquine. That agency is the MHRA, which stands for Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. In its announcement, it refers to two studies that it says informed its decision. It doesn’t specify one, but it appears that the unnamed study refers, shamelessly, to research published in the Lancet (shame on the Lancet) that was quickly enough called out for the fakery it was, leading to the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine having to retract that research article. I guess that Boris’s lie is meant for the majority who don’t lift a little finger to learn for themselves, who don’t question authorities no matter how many times the authorities lie to them and who have become cattle and can be led to slaughter with no effort.

Mike notes that HCQ is no longer in patent and is therefore quite cheap. Boris’s reason for trying to sideline the cheaper drug for something pricey? He’s a gangster within an American-led gangster Corporatocracy. His concern for the health of the people means, exactly, his concern for the health of the capitalists who own, run and ruin the world.

Brian Gerrish

Brian then finishes up with a laugh at the expense of the Guardian. My understanding was that the UK government (like the Canadian government) was stepping in to help with the funding of its propaganda organs, aka, corporate media. So I found this to be somewhat confusing. Regardless, Here’s some images that the presenters show. See the video for the verbal commentary that accompanied the showing of the slides. It’s quite funny. Have a look:

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Covid 19 – Slugs Covered In Neurotoxin And Ocular Parasites

Gary Null’s website version: https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-fcgbm-932d6da?utm_campaign=w_share_ep&utm_medium=dlink&utm_source=w_share

Rosemary Frei

What follows is from the above Corbett Report of June 16, 2020. James interviews Rosemary Frei, whose articles I have read only a few of. I haven’t read many only because I haven’t come across many. I didn’t know that she was a fellow Torontonian. As I’ve noted before, I don’t have much information about Canada, or Ontario, in covid 1984 simply because Canadian alternative media is awful and I don’t have time for it. When alternative media doesn’t have time for covid 1984, which is destroying lives (and, I believe, will lead into Armageddon), and repeats lies when it does mention it, I’m blown away. Maybe I’ll discover decent Canadian alternative/progressive media going forward, but what I have discovered so far has proven to be fake. That would be all of it. Even stalwarts like Yves Engler and Dimitri Lascaris have proven to be not solid in this fake pandemic crisis. If you push the idea that the pandemic is real, then you’re not progressive. Period. It means that you don’t follow progressive media or you’re ignorant. If you actually don’t follow genuine progressive/alternative media, then I think that that’s a good sign that you aren’t a progressive. If you’re ignorant of covid 1984, but clearly there’s no excuse for it – you’re a lawyer (Dimitri) or researcher and author of many books (Yves Engler) – then you aren’t for real. I call it the way I see it.

The one good look at I had at the state of affairs here in Ontario was from the very article that James in this show discusses with Rosemary, which article takes a look at Dr Dirk Huyer and the monkey business he is involved in. I had forgotten about it until I listened to this show (which I then decided, half way through the show, to feature in this blog post). James’s website notes that “Rosemary Frei has an M.Sc in molecular biology from a faculty of medicine and was a freelance medical journalist for 22 years. She is now an independent journalist in Canada” and refers to her relatively recent article, linked to below, titled “Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose?”

Rosemary, in introducing herself, notes that she had worked in medical journalism for trade publications for physicians and specialists but she got tired of the influence of Big Pharma on the business. She found that in all of her conversations with the doctors, for her job, she found herself spending too much time screening for Big Pharma’s influence on them.

The first thing that James and Rosemary talk about are three main conditions created by the authorities that were contributing factors for the high death rates in care homes in Ontario. (I just don’t believe that it has anything to do with a virus myself. I could be wrong, but at this point, the whole gene theory scene that Rockefeller medicine depends on is just too scammy for me to accept that there are viruses, or that they are what establishment doctors say they are. You have to wonder; When they refuse to actually identify, using Koch’s postulates, the gold standard for such things, that there are viruses…)

The first condition, Rosemary notes, was the overly broad definition of covid 19. If you have sniffles and a cough, you are told that you have covid. She notes that they set that condition right at the outset. Then they made the decision that someone who had covid, as they defined it, meant that everyone else in the long-term care home in which that person resided had the covid if they just so much as sneezed and if they died then they’d be labelled a death by covid 19. They deliberately manufactured the appearance of an outbreak. “Second, the cause of death of everyone who had been diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 infection is recorded as being COVID-19. This is a dictate of the World Health Organization and is followed throughout North America, Europe and elsewhere,” writes Rosemary. Indeed. The WHO is God, except when it isn’t. The flip flopping by the WHO is astounding and people just keep on following it. Now you can get kicked off of YouTube for not accepting WHO guidelines and suggesting anything that goes against the WHO’s guidelines or instructions, while you can get kicked off of public transit (in some places) for following the latest WHO guidelines on masks. If that doesn’t tell you that this is a scam, then you’re ruined. Here in Toronto, the TTC recommends (so far) that everyone wear a mask but it won’t, yet, ban you if you don’t. I can see that changing. They need their second wave after all. And people like those protesters in the States, or anywhere, and people like myself who want to stay healthy and so don’t wear a mask, will be blamed for the second wave, at which point ‘rules’ (not laws) will be issued and made mandatory.

After all – seeing it from an amoral government’s point of view – the growing numbers of elderly are a big burden on today’s fiscally strained governments, because in aggregate they’re paying much less into the tax base than younger people while causing the costs of healthcare and retirement programs to skyrocket. – Rosemary from her article

So, Rosemary noted that the second condition was a deliberate privileging of younger people and a shutting of the door on the elderly. Here in Canada, that condition stemmed from an April 17th federal government guideline that not only do you privilege the young in dealing with covid victims, but elderly people in long-term care homes should not be sent to hospitals if they are sick. Let’s just kill them off in other words. (Although there are issues here. I do not think that hospitals are safe and that’s not because of covid 19 which is nothing.) Then James and Rosemary talk about the 3rd contributory factor, namely the guidelines for the removal of corpses from care homes. They changed the rules, for evil reasons it turns out, so that when a patient dies in a care home, that person’s body is to removed immediately, contrary to common sense. As the scammy Dr. Dirk Huyer once said, according to Rosemary, you should ‘not’ remove a body before it has been examined in the setting in which that person died. Now he’s changed his mind. Will he tell us why? Will we discover why? Rosemary tells James that she had only discovered that bit of hypocrisy in her prepping for the show. James hopes that she confronts Dr Huyer with his previous statements about not removing bodies from the scene of death before examining them there. She reads from his 51 page affadavit, which I looked at, and read much of, but doesn’t specify where exactly her quote resides in that document and I couldn’t find it. Using a search of the term “in situ,” which Rosemary said (whether quoting or not, I don’t know) for example, didn’t return anything other than a diagram of an extraction bay (?). Rosemary adds that since his rapid, quiet but radical changing of rules about coroner’s duties, Dr Dirk Huyer has been placed in charge of testing (for covid 19?) in all of Ontario. Yikes!

“On April 9 the Chief Coroner for Ontario, Dr. Dirk Huyer, released rules for an ‘expedited death response’ in handling and disposition of bodies of people who die in care homes and hospitals.

“The stated goal was to prevent infection spread, overburdening of medical staff, and overfilling of hospital morgues and body-storage areas in care homes in the event of a surge in deaths during the pandemic.” – from Rosemary’s article

In a telephone conversation with Rosemary, Dr Hyer said that he had, working with Bereavement Authority of Ontario, come up with the new rules on April 8th. Rosemary notes that that was news that was missing from the corporate media. Rosemary notes that Dr Huyer’s rationale for the creation of the new rules is bogus. The actual rules are not found on the Chief Coroner’s website but only on the Bereavement Authority of Ontario’s website. They were presented to managers in webinars shortly after being created. (Clearly, You want to limit awareness and discussion of the scam.) As for Dr Huyer’s rationale, There was no flood of covid 19 victims anywhere, as we all know now, but which makes no difference to the plandemic scammers. Keep hoax alive! If you have a body in a hospital, it has to be removed within an hour. If you have a body in a long-term care facility, it has to be removed within 3 hours, even if there is supposed to be a coroner’s investigation. That’s all premised on the lie that the bodies are going to be piling up everywhere and removing them faster than usual is the only solution. The only solution to a scam is to do whatever you have to in order to pull it off and do whatever you have to in order to keep people from seeing the scam. As James notes, Even the most credulous person should see that something’s off here. These big changes are being made in the middle of the covid chaos, quietly, and hurriedly.

The rule changes, Rosemary notes, are radical. A death certificate (as in the UK, where they also pulled off this sort of scam) no longer need be filled out by someone who had actually seen the deceased person before he or she died. They are now done by the office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario by people who have never seen the person who has died. And those bodies are cremated or buried as fast as they can remove them. Postmortems are not done. How convenient.

Ezekiel Emanuel

Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Democratic Party operative Rahm Emanuel (whose father was an Israeli terrorist), comes up in the discussion in connection with some medical paper out of the New England Journal of Medicine that the Canadian government is deferring to in its covid 19 response. Ezekiel Emanuel co-wrote it and was the lead author!

“Thus Eugenics Quarterly, a journal co-founded by Osborn for publishing eugenics research, changed its name in 1970 to Social Biology. The American Eugenics Society was renamed the Society for the Study of Social Biology. Osborn himself took the reins of the Population Council, which had been created by John D. Rockefeller III to focus on the threat of the expansion of non-white populations. The Eugenics Society merely moved its offices into the Population Council headquarters and the two groups merged together.

“In 1968, the Population Council and the Rockefeller family provided funds for Daniel Callahan to found the Hastings Center, one of the earliest and most influential of the academic bioethics research institutes, boasting many of the leading bioethicists as fellows including Ezekiel Emanuel and Peter Singer. The link is made even more transparent by the fact that the founding director of the Hastings Center, Theodosius Dobzhansky, was a chairman of the American Eugenics Society (1964-1973), while Hastings founder Callahan became a director of the Eugenics Society (1987-1992). – James Corbett, “Bioethics and Eugenics: The Ugly Truth””

James and Rosemary continue their discussion of hospital care rationing (triage). James notes that, at a glance what they say about it seems reasonable. But when you look closer, it’s horrifying. James mentions an article that Rosemary quotes, namely “Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19,” which Ezekiel Emanuel is a co-author of. Rosemary’s beef with the article is that, again, they’re changing the rules. For example, in professional discussions of triage, in the past, doctors did not mention age at all. Now, all the important articles dealing with triage are saying that age is an important criterion. I guess that can’t reduce the population fast enough so they figure grandma and grandpa can be offed without too much fuss – especially if they make it appear reasonable. Rosemary notes that the (pathetic) Canadian Medical Association says that it doesn’t have time to create its own guidelines, so they’ll just use the New England Journal of Medicine’s guideline. Rosemary notes that there’s a big set of organizations for putting together such guidelines, but all of a sudden what is extremely important is no longer extremely important. That’s because the covid 19 pandemic is a hoax and, while they are surprised that they’ve had the success they’ve had to date, they probably want to get further along in the operation before people begin to push back in earnest. Rosemary’s theory is that the government is amoral and sees the elderly as an unnecessary expense. James is right to note that there’s more to it than just that. James also mentions a presentation that Rosemary gave to Toronto City Council on April 8, 2019. I’ve excerpted just her presentation (there were others who presented and I’m going to watch the rest of the video later because it looks very interesting) and present it below:

James makes the point that the crisis has to be magnified as much as possible because governments have invested billions in the hoax. James notes that there’s interesting corporate connections that should be explored and shows the following image:

James asks Rosemary what she’s looking into now and she refers to an Off Guardian article she worked on with Amory Devereux, about Koch’s postulates, and brings up the fact that the covid 19 virus hasn’t actually been identified or proven to exist. “Scientists Have Utterly Failed to Prove that the Coronavirus Fulfills Koch’s Postulates” is the title of her article. I actually found the article to be a bit weak, but still, in it’s main contention it is correct and the subject is rather important, to say the least. They’ve destroyed the world and many lives, claiming that a virus that they haven’t proven exists made them do it.

And it kind of doesn’t have anything to do with this post, or maybe it does, but it occurred to me that Jeff Bezos’s saving of the awesome sci fi show, “The Expanse,” may have been not such a great thing afterall. I hope that people understand that there is a juggernaut called the ‘entertainment/military/intelligence-industrial complex’ that exists for scammy capitalists to make money, only secondarily, but primarily so that the powers that shouldn’t be can control the population. (Mixing entertainment with propaganda has been a winning formula for those who own, rule and ruin the world. But people have some responsibility for their own mental and spiritual condition. Too many people, we see, didn’t care enough to know that they were be manipulated by exploiters and so here we are. James warned everyone early on in this crisis that if people give into the fear that the authorities were trying to whip up, then they’d be enabling them.) For a long time after the fourth season of the show ended, I was feeling so disappointed with it. After proving to be a stellar, no pun intended, show for the first three seasons, season 4, after Bezos’s rescue, was utter crap. And what did it feature? It featured threats out there, in the form of dumb but deadly bugs, that we aren’t prepared for. Hmmm. Did Jeff, of the same superclass as Bill Gates, know something that we mere mortals did not know?

“Oxfam International reported in January 2016 that 62 people hold as much wealth as half the world, and one year later Oxfam reported that half the world’s wealth was now owned by only eight men. Wealth concentration is happening so rapidly that it is feasible that someday soon one man will hold more wealth than half the humans in the world. The top six billionaires in 2017, with their country of citizenship, and estimated net worth, were Bill Gates (US, $56 billion), Amancio Ortega (Spain, $84.6 billion), Jeff Bezos (US, $82 billion)… The billionaires are similar to plantation owners. They know they are a small minority with vast resources and power, yet they must continually worry about the unruly, exploited mass rising in rebellion.” – pages 21 & 22 of “Giants – The Global Power Elite” by Peter Phillips

We – those of us who rebel and those of us who just try to keep our heads low – are outgunned (if it’s literal rebellion we want), as William Blum makes clear. That’s how it appears to me. Tell me, though, Jeff: Do you fear God who you call to to “Bring it!”

Obscenities pile up on top of obscenities in covid 1984. There’s an interesting scripture in the Christian Bible, in the book of Revelation, that says that 3 inspired expressions, like frogs (which were unclean to Jews), come out of the mouth of the dragon (Satan, the first 7-headed beast), the wild beast (second 7-headed wild beast; dominant world powers since Egypt), and the False Prophet (the United States) and they influence the politicians to directly go to war with God. Well, Can you be more Godless than they are being right now? The are calling loudly and clear to God to “Bring it!” Their trampling of his standards – State terrorism, mass murder (the lockdown) on top of mass murder (regime changing all over the planet) and plans to genetically modify us are all as ungodly as it gets. ‘Three’ in the Christian Bible is used symbolically to denote emphasis. The evil is evil. The good will be evident when God answers the ruined ones’ prayers and brings it.

Posted in General | Tagged , | Leave a comment