Covid 19 – Thanks Cattle. The Exploiters See That Their Hoax Worked And Will Therefore Press On

What follows is about the above Highwire show:

Del shows us news clips of battling anchors from each side of the (phony) Republican Party / Democratic Party divide, with each side yelling at the other about misreporting on the covid 19 pandemic hoax. (Del also seems to be saying that he’s a progressive, but you absolutely cannot be a progressive ‘and’ an imperialist ‘and’ pro American exceptionalism, which Del is. And he tries to sell the idea that the contest between China and the US is real. Right. American States are buying Chinese drones to spy on American citizens but China is the enemy. As James Evans Pilato noted on a recent episode of New World Next Week, that makes that US vs China talk look like kabuki theater.) Del notes that there’s also a divide in science when it comes to covid 19. A good development concerns the closer look, by scientists, at what scientists themselves referred to as a consensus on vaccines.

Del is concerned about YouTube’s CEO Susan Wojcicki’s crazy talk about censoring any talk on its platform that contradicts not US government positions on covid 19, but UN/WHO positions on covid 19. (He referred to Google as a US government organization. It’s officially a US-based company, I’m sure, and, looking at how it came about, as Yasha Levine does in “Surveillance Valley,” we ‘can’ identify Google with the US government, but Is that how it is usually stated?) Still, Google is not a UN body. On the other hand, corporations and capitalists really do rule and they are no longer bound by national borders. That’s why you have terms like the Transnational Capitalist Class. (Governments are, as Chris Hedges says all the time, merely fronts for corporations. Governments are glorified police forces, which is what the TCC intended that they be. When Del drops into his American exceptionalism mode, he is cheerleading for his preferred police force.) So, Del is complaining about the facade but he’s not being straight about the fact that nation States are, to a great extent, fakery. If Del was to be completely honest, he would be pro American exceptionalism by talking about how his perfect, holy country ‘dominates’ the world government known as Corporatocracy. But that kind of honesty from Del doesn’t seem to be in the cards.

“The Occupy Movement used the 1 percent vs. the 99 percent mantra as a master concept in its demonstrations, disruptions, and challenges to the practices of the Transnational Corporate Class. Occupy was exactly what the Global Power Elites fear the most – a global democratic movement that exposes the agenda of capitalism and the continuing theater of government elections, where the actors in each performance may change but the marquee remains the same.

“The military empire dominated by the United States and the North Altantic Treaty Organization (NATO) serves to protect power elite investments around the world. Wars, regime changes, and occupations performed by military and intelligence agencies remain in service to investors’ access to natural resources, free flow of capital, debt collection, and speculative advantages in the world marketplace.” – page 228 of “Giants – The Global Power Elite” by Peter Phillips

Del has Dr Daniel Erickson (of censored by YouTube fame) on the show to talk. Dr Erickson praises the Swedish non, more or less, lockdown (lock-up) policies which have produced great results. Then we are forced to hear from the UN’s Dr Michael Ryan, who, to my ears, is trying hard to not give Sweden credit, but he can’t really pull that off. I really, really don’t want to hear from or about Dr Michael Ryan ever again since he’s suggested that the authorities might have to enter people’s homes in order to drag out sick people. He is a criminal in my mind. He’s a monster. But he’s got lots of company. When I first heard about Dan Erickson and Arnit Massihi, it was stated that the pair had garnered 5 million YouTube views before YouTube attacked. Del just now mentioned 10 million views! I assume that that’s 5 million on YouTube plus an additional 5 million views on various other platforms. Dan cites various developments like criminals being released from jails while people on beaches (even with no one around) get arrested, and people shopping at CostCo and mingling but ticketed for doing it elsewhere and banned from churches and so on and notes how irrational all of that is. He calls it acting out of fear. Sure, And when that fear was deliberately generated, it’s called terrorism.

Pablo Goldschmidt

Dan thinks that China and South Korea, which locked down ‘after’ they had peaked conferred an advantage. That contradicts what I actually learned from Del’s previous shows where he shows that initiating lockdown when the curve has flattened actually prolonged the life of the virus, unless I didn’t understand exactly what Dan was saying. Because he then ‘does’ make the point (that Del has made in previous shows) that you prolong the life of the virus with lockdowns. Del asks Dr Erickson about why the media created this pandemic hysteria and Dan didn’t really have a good answer for that, in my view. Again, This is what technocracy means. People are specialized into stupidity. I am not saying that Dan is stupid. I am saying that there are whole large areas where experts like Dr Erickson are ignorant. (An excellent source of info is Swiss Propaganda Research, looked at below. One article that they link to, is an interview of virologist named Pablo Goldschmidt. He offers some much needed counter-balance to the corporate media nonsense gushing out of people’s glass God, but when he’s asked whether there’s something going on, reveals that he’s utterly clueless about things like the Transnational Capitalist Class and agendas of members in it like Bill Gates and Peter Thiel. Asked about a conspiracy, Pablo responds with: “I have the impression that the government is acting very well and carefully. However, it is put under pressure by the international authority (here, in my opinion, the WHO; translator’s note) with the death rates that the experts of the WHO use mathematical calculations to compile. However, this is not about bad will, but about incompetence. There is no one working in the background.”) That’s as a result of technocracy’s impact. And societies are technocratic because bosses, and therefore, political leaders, want it that way. They don’t want well-rounded citizens who were given a liberal education that encourges students to know whatever they can learn and know whatever their natural curiousity leads them to investigate. Bosses don’t want political innovators who might eventually come up with a better way of organizing society that just happens to dislodge them and theirs, aka the current crop of parasites. They want students to be trained to run ‘their’ (the parasites) world, period. Dan should have led with Del’s own point when he’s talking about media, namely, It is funded, largely, by big pharma. Ergo…

Del askes Dr Erickson a good question, in my view, when he asks him whether he expects the authorities who got Americans in the pickle (my term) they are in (and that’s putting it so very mildly when they are in fact responsible for many deaths) are going to try to cover their butts and weasle out of responsibility for the damage they’ve caused. I flashed back to a recent Corbett Report show where James talked with Monica Perez and Brad Binkley about covid 19. I thought Monica made a great point about their having gone so far, and having been so successful with their hoax, that we can’t expect them to back off now. See an excerpt of that show, below, on my Bitchute channel. Powerful special interests and their political and other tools launched this pandemic hoax, with individual members of the superclass having specific goals in mind but with each of those agendas meshing with the other and with the overall goal of opening up fully vaccine-centered investment opportunities. With the kind of success that they’ve had in controlling and tricking people, there just isn’t any reason to expect them to back off. Del may wish for that. But there’s no reason to expect that they are going to quit now.

Click on the image in order to view the clip on my Bitchute channel.

Del concludes his interview with Dr Erickson and notes that Dan was saying the same things that they were saying for some time on The Highwire. For example, An asymptomatic carrier is just a healthy person and yet there’s Deborah Birx, who is Donald Trump’s Coronavirus Response Coordinator, threatening those healthy people, implying that they are a problem and are going to make everyone else sick with a deadly disease. Like her boss, Pretty much everything that comes out of her mouth is a lie. Worse, She holds lying up to be a good thing. I’ve talked about this a thousand times. It’s called mysterious lawlessness. Those who act criminally, whether that criminality is serious or less serious, are observed by others who lack a moral foundation (and principles), and those wishy washy onlookers rightly conclude that bad must sometimes be good. They are mystified that people, educated professionals (clergy, politicians, doctors, lawyers, etc), who clearly know a thing or two and clearly know right from wrong, are law-breaking or acting immorally and so, because they aren’t themselves solid – as Jesus Christ said (as recorded at Matthew 5:37), ‘Let your yes mean yes, and your no mean no’ – they draw wrong conclusions (that are right from the standpoint of those in a mental and spiritual fog) from the bad examples before them. Jesus Christ also said that ‘If the light that is in you is in fact darkness, then how great that darkness is!’ (Matthew 6:22,23) In other words, When you know better and yet you lie, murder, terrorize, whatever, then you’re reprehensible. You are in a sense darker than criminals engaged in the same behavior but not having education or great smarts.

Jefferey Jaxen reports that there is a six week total of jobless claims in the US of 30 million. Jaxen thinks that this horrofic tally is slowing down, but, he notes, Who knows about ripple effects? In May, something like 9 states are supposed to start opening their economies. Easing up on lock-up and opening up the economy are not exactly the same thing. A Breitbart article looked at in the show notes that the supply chains are breaking. There is so much wasted food (plant and livestock) happening right now because of the disruption in supply chains. All of which can be laid at the foot of the political tools used by the TCC. (I was following orders doesn’t cut it.) Jefferey looks at an appalling article in The Atlantic, by authors Jack Goldsmith and Andrew Keane Woods, titled “Internet Speech Will Never Go Back to Normal.” In it, the powertrippers cheerily announce that China is right about censorship.

The indispensable Swiss Propaganda Research, in its most recent published update, includes a section on Dr Dan Erickson. Visit the site for the entire update. Progressive organizations (whose staff have not sold their souls) tap this excellent source of information.

An excerpt from the above linked-to update, examining Dr Erickson’s sudden fame, follows:

:||:-
The Californian physician Dr. Dan Erickson described his observations regarding Covid19 in a much-noticed press briefing. Hospitals and intensive care units in California and other states have remained largely empty so far. Dr. Erickson reports that doctors from several US states have been „pressured“ to issue death certificates mentioning Covid19, even though they themselves did not agree. Dr. Erickson recommends quarantining only the sick and not the healthy or the whole society, as this could have negative effects on health and psyche. A significant increase in „secondary effects“ such as alcoholism, depression, suicide and abuse of children and spouses has already been observed. Based on figures from various countries, Dr. Erickson estimates the lethality of Covid-19 to be about 0.1% or similar to influenza. According to Dr Erickson, a face mask only makes sense in acute situations such as in hospital, but not in everyday life. (Note: Youtube deleted the press briefing after it had 5 million views.)
-:||:

A doctor in a protective suit taking a nasal swab from a person to test for possible coronavirus infection

“Coronavirus and Infection Control: What’s Going on with Testing?” by Mary Holland (Children’s Health Network)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

::::—
April 30, 2020
Coronavirus and Infection Control: What’s Going on with Testing?
Print

By Mary Holland, Vice Chair and General Counsel, Children’s Health Defense

People locked down in their homes for weeks and months are eager to resume their lives. Many public health agencies, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), state that such reopening requires extensive testing for coronavirus. It’s a business truism that to manage something, you must measure it. So the focus on testing makes sense.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee is a pathologist and research scientist based in Connecticut who has been producing molecular tests for diseases and conditions for many years, including Lyme disease and human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Dr. Lee trained and taught in some of the world’s most prestigious institutions and has published scores of scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals.

Dr. Lee is a hero to those concerned about HPV vaccine safety because he proved that the HPV vaccine contained HPV DNA fragments, something that Merck and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) denied. These fragments were part of the reasons for so many adverse events. His research made the FDA come clean about the presence of the DNA in the vaccine, but the agency continued to deny its significance and harmful potential.

The need for accurate coronavirus testing is imperative. It is especially critical in nursing homes and institutions caring for elderly patients, so that false-positive patients are not housed with true-positive patients. It’s also essential to ensure that staff in direct contact with highly susceptible patients be infection-free…

Dr. Lee has been working diligently to overcome the roadblocks in coronavirus testing – only to hit new ones at the very agencies responsible for ensuring the pandemic’s end. Dr. Lee wrote to the WHO and to Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to explain why the current tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA are generating false positives and negatives. He explained that a two-phased test would “guarantee no-false positive results” based on his research and published work from Japan.

He offered to retest the residues of any patient samples that have generated questionable results, using a highly sensitive nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test followed by DNA sequencing of a unique 398 bp N gene amplicon for confirmation. Dr. Lee asked to be in contact with the coronavirus teams at the WHO and NIH so that he could assist them to ensure highly accurate tests, especially for elder care facilities where the need is greatest for extreme accuracy.

Given the specificity of his letter, with its charts on DNA sequencing, and its significance for preventing disease spread, it is almost unbelievable that as of April 27, Dr. Lee has received no response from either the WHO or NIH. He has similarly reached out to the Connecticut Department of Public Health to receive patient samples for further validation testing. The Connecticut Department has stopped responding to Dr. Lee’s emails and phone calls.
—::::

People have simply, freely, chosen to sell their souls for possible, temporary survival in this fascist, manmade hell called Corporatocracy. If they don’t think that there will be consequences for that, they are wrong. But I can understand how, after making such decision, those selling their souls wouldn’t want to think too much about it. Who wants to know that there’s a God who will judge them when they’ve trampled his standards, disrespected him and sought to replace him?

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

(:-
This is my ninth installment in CHD’s series of studies comparing health outcomes in vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations. Despite CDC’s and NIH’s (Tony Fauci’s) efforts to prevent the creation of these studies, courageous and independent university and government scientists have found ways to perform vaccinated/ unvaxxed studies. We have now assembled nearly 60 studies- all published in previous installments on my Instagram page and on CHD’s website. All of these studies found vaccinated cohorts to be far sicker than their unvaccinated peers. CDC blocks access by independent scientists to the largest vaccine database, the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which Congress created expressly for the purpose of performing this kind of study.

(See full-sized Part 9 slides or see the complete Vaxxed-Unvaxxed presentation, Parts 1-9.)
-:)

See the orgininal, above linked-to article, for the links to the two pdf files mentioned at the conclusion of the above excerpt.

“The Covid vaccine: simple facts staring us in the face” by Jon Rappoport (Jon Rappoport’s Blog)

An excerpt from the above linked-to blog post follows:

)))-))-)
Public health agencies readily admit that people with weakened immune systems should not be vaccinated.

But the language they use is dodgy and incomplete. The CDC states: “A vaccine should not be administered when a contraindication is present; for example, MMR vaccine should not be administered to severely immunocompromised persons…Severely immunocompromised persons generally should not receive live vaccines…”

No word about killed-virus vaccines. No word about the dangers of vaccine components, such as aluminum and formaldehyde.

But there are more issues. According to conventional vaccine theory, the injection of a germ stimulates the immune system to mount a response—and this is an effective rehearsal, preparing the immune system to react quickly, later, when the real disease comes along.

But if the recipient of the vaccine has an immune system that is already impaired, how can the “experts” believe the rehearsal will go smoothly? The recipient’s antibody scouts would respond sluggishly. The immune killer cells would fail to carry out their mission of wiping out the germ-invaders in the vaccine.

To use a mechanical analogy, vaccinating people with compromised immune systems is like pumping more efficient fuel into a car to improve its performance, when in fact the car’s engine is already disabled.

Worse yet, vaccinating a person whose immune system is weak would overwhelm his body’s defenses with injected chemicals and germs, creating dire levels of illness. The rehearsal would be the real thing—and the body would take the punishment.

All right. Now imagine a few billion people receiving a new COVID vaccine. Do you seriously think doctors are going to spend time sorting out all these people, to discover whose immune systems are already weak, and shunting them off into the do-not-vaccinate category? Of course they won’t.

No mass vaccination campaign (for example, in Africa) has separated the weak from the strong—and none of those campaigns approached the numbers envisioned for the COVID vaccine.
(-((-(((

Click on the above image in order to view James Corbett’s “MUST SEE: How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health” on James’s Bitchute channel.

“We Must Wear Face Masks? Show Me the Science Behind That!” by David Brownstein (Dr Brownstein’s Holistic Medecine)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

:::: ::: :: :
Folks, I have been writing to you about COVID for over a month. It is been a painful time period for all of us. What is really sad is that too many political dictates are being fostered [foisted?] on us without any good scientific evidence to back them up. One of those requirements that has me irritated is the use of face coverings that I see so prevalent out there. When I go to Costco, 95% of the people in the store are wearing face masks. Why is that?

The Governor of Michigan recently released an edict requiring that citizens wear a face covering when in any enclosed public space. It specifically states, “Any individual able to medically tolerate a face covering must wear a covering over his or her nose and mouth—such as a homemade mask, scarf, bandana, or handkerchief—when in any enclosed public space.” Later in the edict, it states, “Supplies of N95 masks and surgical masks should generally be reserved, for now, for health care professionals, first responders and other critical workers who interact with the public.”

It should be well known that cloth masks, bandanas, or handkerchiefs will do very little to stop the spread of coronavirus. In fact, they may actually increase your risk of becoming ill from corona and other influenza-like illnesses. A 2015 study found cloth masks, when compared to surgical masks, increase the rate of influenza-like illnesses 13x! (1) Cloth masks are probably best avoided and should not be reused without properly sanitizing them.

Regular surgical masks are not much better in this situation. The COVID-19 virus is 0.125 µm in size. Surgical masks have been shown to not adequately filter against aerosols measuring from 0.9-3.1 µm. (2) Other researchers have shown that particles from 0.04-0.2 µm can penetrate surgical masks. (3)

A 2020 study in Seoul, South Korea looked at the effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking COVID-19 in a controlled comparison of four patients. (4) The COVID-infected patients were put in negative pressure isolated rooms. The scientists compared disposable surgical masks (3 layers) with reusable cotton masks. Patients were instructed to cough 5 times while wearing no mask, surgical mask, or cotton mask. Interestingly, all swabs from the outer masks—including surgical masks—were positive for COVID-19. Inner masks were also found to be contaminated. That means the mask did not effectively filter out the COVID virus since it is too small. The authors state, “Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered {COVID-19} during coughs by infected patients.”
: :: ::: ::::

“Yes, I Still Oppose The Lockdown — Principles and Fear in the Age of COVID-19” by Brandon Turbeville (Brian Turbeville via Activist Post)

An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:

||o|
On March 24, I wrote one of my most controversial articles, “Two Hundred And Thirty Years Of Rights And Liberties Shredded: Why I Oppose The Lockdown.”

Of course, nothing said in the article should ever be considered controversial. I merely stated my opposition to the “lockdowns” taking place all across the country, the violations of the 1st and 4th Amendments, and the deliberate crashing of the economy…

On numerous instances, I was arrogantly challenged by another writer to “give it a week” and see if my position is still the same. Presumably, the virus outbreak would have worsened by then and I would be so horrified by the death and horror around me, I would retract my previous position about rights being sacred and come to love Big Brother. In a week, I would acknowledge that 2 + 2 = 5 and join the masses calling for lockdowns and shutdowns and whatever else “authorities” have in store for us…

But it is worth pointing out the absurdity of the fear in real-time when one observes the statistics related to Coronavirus and/or COVID-19.

First, it should be made clear that I am not denying the existence of the virus…

But back to the reason for panic – we have to ask ourselves just what we are so afraid of? For anyone listening to the mainstream media, you would be led to believe that COVID-19 is affecting everyone of all ages with a 100% kill rate and that thousands have died of the virus in every city in the country. You might be shocked to see the numbers of deaths vs the numbers of the population of the country, state, and city. You might be shocked to see the number of full recoveries.

In Italy, one of the most publicized and allegedly hardest hit areas of the world, it has been admitted that the deaths attributed to COVID-19 were almost all elderly people with underlying health conditions. This is not meant to sound harsh to those with underlying conditions or the elderly, but many people in this condition were not only more susceptible to this virus but to many other viruses as well.

However, while mainstream media outlets shout down anyone who questions the numbers as “conspiracy theorists” or of hatred of the elderly, it is hard to take the insults seriously since it is precisely these same outlets and their host nations that make the elderly choose between electricity, food, and medicine. It might be worth asking the thousands of British elderly who freeze to death every year because of the British government’s policies if the UK government cares about the elderly. It might be wise to ask elderly Americans who routinely skip medications because purchasing them would see them skip groceries or rent if the US government cares about its senior citizens. If hospitals cared about the elderly, why are so many of them issuing immediate “Do Not Resuscitate” orders for anyone coming in to the facility with COVID-19? For that matter, if they cared about the elderly, why are they imposing DNR orders for all people with cardiac emergencies, particularly the elderly? If the elderly are going to be left to die anyway, why restrict rights at all? Why panic at all? The elderly and disabled are being sacrificed on the altar of panic and fear and, ironically, under the guise of protecting the sick and the disabled.

Indeed, all around the country, in the midst of an alleged pandemic, hospitals are putting doctors and nurses on furlough as they shutter their doors in preparation for the supposed surge of COVID-19 patients that might come someday maybe. No elective surgeries. No cancer tests. In some cases, no emergency room even if you are having a heart attack or were in a car accident. No one is asking how many people will die of preventable diseases because their tests were put off months later, allowing the disease to progress to an untreatable stage.

Likewise, no one seems to be asking, except for a few notable exceptions, how many people will die as a result of the economic crash..

These same people will continue to support lockdowns, the crushing of the American economy, jail for walking your dog, and the coming vaccine mandates. They will continue to snitch on their neighbors for walking in the park. They will continue to rush forward in whatever direction their television sets tell them to go…
|o||

I believe that hospitals are beginning to ease up on the ‘no elective’ treatment orders. How many doctors worship the glass God I wonder?

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Feel free to comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.