“Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” Vaccine Project: Some Scenarios” by Jefferey Jaxen (The Highwire)
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
“I just want to make something clear, it’s very important. Vaccine or no vaccine, we’re back.”
Those words were spoken by President Donald Trump from a recent White House Rose Garden press conference. With reporters spread out across the lawn, exactly six feet apart, Trump took the podium as his coronavirus task force filled in behind him. Some with masks, some without.
Rumored to be coming to an end only last week, the task force will now continue “indefinitely,” according to the President. It has been expanded by five new members: Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, Labor Secretary Gene Scalia, National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Francis Collins (Tony Fauci’s supervisor,) Food and Drug Administration Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Dr. Peter Marks and Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration, Thomas Engels.
During his initial campaign, Trump’s statements questioning vaccine safety kept both the medical industry and media off balance. Shortly before his inauguration, a one-off meeting with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. where he reportedly asked Kennedy to chair an independent vaccine safety advisory panel fizzled…
After a week of unnamed sources leaking details, Trump publicly confirmed a vaccine, diagnostic and therapeutic initiative called “Operation Warp Speed.” Drawing parallels to World War II’s “Manhattan Project,” Trump said: “Its objective is to develop and distribute a proven coronavirus vaccine as fast as possible.”
After Trump initially questioned vaccine-autism links and safety issues in 2015, he’s been surrounded, muzzled and sidetracked away from such inquiry. He now prefers to listen to his trusted health agency heads and Big Pharma industry leaders. A businessman at heart, without medical training, his battle with Big Pharma isn’t waged against the safety issues of their products but with the quality and prices of those products…
Trump was ‘trumped’ by Bill Gates and his massive foundation from the get-go in the coronavirus vaccine race. Gates and his wife have been busy making sure that both America and the world understand that life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until a vaccine is developed – a talking point parroted by governors and Fauci himself – though subscribed to by Trump.
Alex Thomson, of UK Column News, noticed that Boris was surrounded by security that prevented him from getting and receving information from the general public and independent voices. I noted, in a previous blog post that, “Alex Thomson explains that the UK’s National Security Council is shielding Boris Johnson from saying things he shouldn’t, and also, mainly, shielding him from hearing from others who they don’t want him to hear from. Do they not trust the Prime Minister to play ball?” On the other hand, Boris strikes me as being in the know and totally willing to go along with what Bill Gates and his superclass are doing. And it’s a fact that, generally, Corporatocracy governments take their marching orders from the Transnational Capitalist Class. ‘Leaders’ are tools, but they are willing tools. The Highwire has a hard time with the concept of a very powerful transnational capitalist class that tells American presidents what to do. Del is most definitely suffering from American exceptionalism and it’s ugly to see. No one who knows America’s history, past and present, could think that God blesses it, if they’re adjusted.
“10 Steps to Turn a Pandemic into the Brave New Normal” by Catte Black (Off Guardian)
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
Imagine you were one of the richest people to ever exist, and your vast network of wealth and influence was based on some imaginary money and the widely cultivated belief that “there is no alternative”.
Now imagine the lies which secure your position are suddenly and violently challenged…
You need a threat, something that will make everyone “come together”. To put aside “divisions” and “hate” and all work together to face a “common enemy”
And enemies, like cakes and lemonade, are always far more satisfying when you make them yourself.
Here are the 10 steps you should employ, if you want to turn an unthreatening virus into a global power grab.
1. Start with a poorly defined virus, add an inaccurate test for it, and encourage as many terminally or critically ill people as possible to be repeat tested until they test positive.
2. Report your inevitably very high death rates and get vague about whether these people died OF the virus or simply WITH it.
3. Create a ‘response’ to the ‘crisis’ that rolls out a vast network of authoritarian measures, some of which have been in planning for a long while, and only a minority of which have any possible application to pandemic-prevention. (Make sure to cancel elections until further notice and to hugely increase police powers of arrest and surveillance)
Since February 2020 we have dedicated this site to bringing you the factual reality of the entity called the “covid19 pandemic”. We have done this using official statistics and data, and the ignored testimony of experts in the field.
What has the orthodox story brought, in the same time frame?
The claim for this being a unique pathology requiring unique levels of intervention is being made every day, in virtually every mainstream outlets, many alt news outlets and by virtually every major government and health-related NGO.
It’s a deafening cacophony, a 24/7 bullhorn of fear and certitude, a fog of headlines and speculation and ‘what ifs’ and ‘some experts claim’ and forests of unsourced or unexplained numbers…
Seriously though, people. If you think there is any coherence, rational thought or data behind the global, Gatesian official position – please tell me where it is.
“Plans for post Covid NHS hatched behind the lockdown” by John Lister (The Lowdown)
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
Debates over relaxing the lockdown and whether or not the peak of the Covid-19 crisis may now be behind us have run alongside fleeting glimpses of the surreptitious plans being laid to exploit the continued lockdown on NHS public meetings and spring a succession of unpleasant surprises on the NHS as soon as any recovery period begins.
As we go to press The Lowdown has also seen a letter from NHS England’s London Regional Director Sir David Sloman, sent out internally on April 29 but not published, requiring Integrated Care System Chairs and Senior Responsible Officers to take “urgent action” on system plans for London that “fundamentally change the way we deliver health and care.”
Each ICS is ordered to supply a “revised ICS plan” by Monday May 11. The letter spells out a 12-point list of issues on which bureaucrats in each area are supposed to devise new policy, on the hoof, for a “Recovery Board” meeting on May 13.
Even if the country was not on lockdown, this 12-day turn-round period for proposals on fundamental changes for a New Health and Care system for London, to be in place by November 2021, would indicate a complete disregard for any serious consultation or discussion.
But it’s clear from the way this is being done that any notion of public engagement or accountability is a very low priority afterthought…
Perhaps just as worrying is that while pushing through a whistle-stop process of planning, NHS England is only planning a snail’s pace return to previous levels of elective surgery: “a plan to restart routine elective care as outlined in the national guidance within 12 months”…
Conspicuously as with every NHS reorganisation there is no attempt whatever to critically assess previous plans and proposals, and the extent to which so many plans since Sustainability and Transformation Plans in 2016 have disastrously focused on cost-cutting, reconfiguration and cutbacks in hospital services and capacity – and left the NHS in the capital and throughout England desperately ill-prepared, under-staffed and ill-equipped to deal with a pandemic of any scale.
Clearly the plan is to use jaunty new rhetoric of a “post-Covid NHS” to distract attention while NHS bosses covertly consolidate changes that have been accepted with minimal discussion to deal with the Covid crisis, but which would be controversial as a permanent arrangement.
One thing’s clear about disaster capitalism. Disaster, mafia capitalists care about themselves only. Does the author believe in the idea of a covid 19 pandemic hoax? I don’t know. I see nothing on the Lowdown to inspire me. This article comes to me via Off Guardian.
“YouTube censors epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski for opposing lockdown” by Jon Levine (New York Post)
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
Big Tech companies are aggressively tamping down on COVID-19 “misinformation” — opinions and ideas contrary to official pronouncements.
Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski, former head of biostatistics, epidemiology and research design at Rockefeller University, says YouTube removed a video of him talking about the virus that had racked up more than 1.3 million views.
Wittkowski, 65, is a ferocious critic of the nation’s current steps to fight the coronavirus. He has derided social distancing, saying it only prolongs the virus’ existence, and has attacked the current lockdown as mostly unnecessary.
Wittkowski, who holds two doctorates in computer science and medical biometry, believes the coronavirus should be allowed to create “herd immunity,” and that short of a vaccine, the pandemic will only end after it has sufficiently spread through the population…
Wittkowski’s argument is a minority opinion among his colleagues, but still well within mainstream thought and currently is the basis for Sweden’s non-lockdown approach to the pandemic.
The embattled WHO, however, is not a fan, with the group’s executive director of health emergencies, Mike Ryan, this week calling it “a really dangerous, dangerous calculation.”
Rockefeller University — Wittkowski’s employer for 20 years — also released a statement sharply distancing itself from him last month…
Across social media, censors have been racing to limit the flow of verboten information.
“We have broadened our definition of harm to address content that goes directly against guidance from authoritative sources of global and local public health information,” Twitter said in April shortly after removing two tweets by Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.
That same month, Facebook conceded it had been working with state governments in California, New Jersey and Nebraska to remove pages for anti-quarantine events.
“It’s the kind of totalitarian thinking and conduct that has cost millions of lives in recent world history. The fact that it’s being done by private companies and not government doesn’t change that,” Ron Coleman, a prominent First Amendment lawyer, told The Post.
Well, Michael Ryan, who threatened everyone, saying that the authorities might need to pay us a visit in order to remove us from our homes, in a ‘dignified’ manner of course, doesn’t like what Knut is saying, calling Knut’s statements dangerous. Do I give a damn about what that fascist pig says? And there’s Rockefeller University – Rockefeller University! – distancing itself from Knut. If I were Knut, I’d be relieved about that. But why was he ever a part of that Big Pharma-promoting institution in the first place? Private companies and not government. Hmm. What does that mean in a gangster Corporatocracy?
“Did the Lockdown Save Lives?” by Jeffrey A. Tucker (American Institute for Economic Research)
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
For two to three months, Americans have suffered the loss of liberty, security, and prosperity in the name of virus control. The psychological impact has been beyond description. We thought we could count on basic rights and freedoms. Then over a few days in March, it all ended in ways hardly anyone could believe possible.
The manner in which governments dealt with foundational principles of modernity has been shocking. They put half the country under house arrest and managed every movement in disregard for the Bill of Rights and all legal precedent, to say nothing of the Constitution. It felt like a coercive unraveling of civilization itself. It’s like we are all waking up from a bad dream only to look around and see the wreckage that proves it was all real.
So how can we deal with this terror that befell us? One way is to figure out some aspect in which our sacrifice has been worth it, maybe not on net given the consequences, but surely some good has come out of this. If my email and feeds are correct, this is how many people have been justifying this. The psychology here is rooted in the sunk-cost fallacy: when you commit resources to something, even when it is a proven error, you tend to find justifications by doubling down rather than just admitting the mistake…
The trouble here is that certain features of this experience stand out to contradict the idea that lockdowns are saving lives over the longer term. In New York, two thirds of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were in fact sheltering in place during the lockdown, essentially living in forced isolation. The lockdown didn’t help them; it might have contributed to making matters worse.
That’s exactly how it works Mr Tucker. Elliot Aronson explained it years ago in his phenomenal book titled “The Social Animal.” The following is from pages 99 & 100 of Elliot Aronson’s masterpiece titled “The Social Animal”:
“Picture the following scene: A young man is being hypnotized. The hypnotist places him under a posthypnotic suggestion and tells him that, when the clock strikes four, he will: (1) go to the closet, get his raincoat and galoshes, and put them on; (2) grab an unbrella; (3) walk eight blocks to the Safeway supermarket and purchase six bottles of bourbon; and (4) return home. He is told that, as soon as he reenters his apartment, he will “snap out of it,” and will be himself again.
“When the clock strikes four, the young man immediately heads for the closet, dons his raincoat and galoshes, grabs his umbrella, and trudges out the door on his quest for bourbon. There are a few strange things about his errand: (1) it is a clear, sunshine day – there isn’t a cloud in the sky; (2) there is a liquor store half a block away that sells bourbon for the same price as the Safeway eight blocks away; and (3) the young man doesn’t drink.
“He arrives home, opens the door, reenters his apartment, snaps out of his “trance,” and discovers himself standing there in his raincoat and galoshes, with his umbrella in one hand and a huge sack of liquor bottles in the other. He looks momentarily confused. His friend, the hypnotist, says,
“Hey, Bill, where have you been?”
“Oh, just down to the store.”
“What did you buy?”
“Um…um…it seems that I bought this bourbon.”
“But you don’t drink, do you?”
“No, but…um…um…I’m going to do a lot of entertaining during the next several weeks, and some of my friends do.”
“How come you’re wearing all that rain gear on such a sunny day?”
“Well…actually, the weather is quite changeable this time of year, and I didn’t want to take any chances.”
“But there isn’t a cloud in the sky.”
“Well, you never can tell.”
“By the way, where did you buy the liquor?”
“Oh, heh, heh. Well, um…down at the supermarket.”
“How come you went that far?”
“Well, um…um…it was such a nice day, I thought it might be fun to take a long walk.”
“Mot people are motivated to justify their own actions, beliefs, and feelings. When a person does something, he or she will try, if at all possible, to convince himself or herself (and others) that it was a logical, reasonable thing to do. There was a good reason why Bill performed those silly actions – he was hypnotized, and because it was apparently difficult for him to accept the fact that he was capable of behaving in a totally nonsensical manner, he went to great lengths to convince himself (and his friend) that there was a method to his madness, that is actions were actually quite sensible.”
I remember when I first read Elliot’s book. I was in a fever. I had been thinking so many of the very thoughts that his book talked about. I found that most of what I had believed about how people behaved were exactly what Elliot described in his book. As a Christian, I would add a little and in some instances express things a little differently, but not much. Elliot is also talking there (and elsewhere in his book) about commitment. When you do (do or say) things that you know are wrong, and those things conflict with your positive self-image, which we all possess, then you’ll do one of two things, depending on whether or not you possess humility. Humility, the opposite of false pride (which unprincipled people are full of), is the ability to say you made a mistake. Humility also means the ability accept that others can, and sometimes do, know more about things than you do. Without humility, a person cannot learn. As Ellliot explains, “If a person spends all of his time, protecting his ego, he will never grow.”
Someone who is dedicated to protecting his ego, rather than progressing, will do this: 1. bad deed 2. rationalization 3. unwillingness to admit the mistake 4. doubling down on the mistake and the course that it sets the rationalizer on 5. the rationalizer now attacks all those who possess, from his or her standpoint, the ‘wrong’ views
If you can’t admit (out loud or not) a mistake, then you ‘will’ rationalize it, no matter who you are or how smart you are.
As Jesus Christ said (recorded at Matthew 6:19-21): “For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”
Your treasure is what you’ve ‘chosen’ to commit to, because no one is robbed of free will. You can be coerced, and God will judge when you’ve been tested beyond your ability to resist, but your free will comes from God and no one can take it from you. The point is, If, in faithlessness, you’ve committed to this world’s false saviors, and to the wild beast, the source of false saviors in this dark world, if you’ve invested your “heart” (the real, total you) in this system of things, then, when it’s destroyed, you’ll be destroyed along with it. That’s why Jesus also advised his disciples to store up for themselves treasures in heaven.
One final note about Mr. Tucker’s above article. He notes that “No conclusions can be drawn about the states that sheltered quickly, because their death rates ran the full gamut, from 20 per million in Oregon to 360 in New York. This wide variation means that other variables—like population density or subway use—were more important.” He seems unaware of Wolfgang Wodarg’s discovery, which he explains in an Off Guardian article, of the G6PD factor. Covid 19 patients from Malaria countries would be found in high numbers in migration hotspots like New York. Since hydroxychloraquine harms them… Mr Tucker also states that “mysteriously, one century flipped to the next and we got dumb again…” There’s nothing mysterious going on here. The powerful and privileged, as Whitney Webb points out, have been looking for excuses to roll out agendas that are now rolling out. I’m new to American Institute for Economic Research and while it seems to present fairly good material, it looks Conservative to me and that means, I’m sorry to say, deficient. (I note that we cannot comment on articles posted to AIER.)
“Will the Political Class Be Held Liable For What They’ve Done?” by James Bovard (American Institute for Economic Research)
An exerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
Politically-dictated lockdowns and prohibitions have recently destroyed tens of millions of American jobs. Politicians have effectively claimed a right to inflict unlimited economic damage in pursuit of zero COVID-19 contagion. The perverse incentives driving the policy have multiplied the harm far beyond the original peril.
Almost 40% of households earning less than $40,000 per year have someone who lost their job in recent months, according to the Federal Reserve. The Disaster Distress Helpline, a federal crisis hotline, received almost 900% more phone calls in March compared to a year ago. A recent JAMA Psychiatry analysis warned that stay-at-home orders and rising unemployment are a “perfect storm” for higher suicide rates. A California health organization recently estimated that up to 75,000 Americans could die from “despair” as a result of the pandemic, unemployment, and government restrictions.
In the name of saving lives, politicians have entitled themselves to destroy an unlimited number of livelihoods. Politicians in many states responded to COVID-19 by dropping the equivalent of a Reverse Neutron Bomb – something which destroys the economy while supposedly leaving human beings unharmed. But the only way to assume people were uninjured is to believe their existence is totally detached from their jobs, bank accounts, and mortgage and rent payments…
The state of Missouri has sued the government of China, claiming it is liable for the losses inflicted by the virus that apparently originated in Wuhan, China. Most observers predict that lawsuit will go nowhere. But, thanks to sovereign immunity, it would be even more hopeless for American citizens to sue American politicians for the damage that their shutdown orders have inflicted on their businesses, paychecks, and lives.
Sovereign immunity creates a two-tiered society: those above the law and those below it; those whom the law fails to bind and those whom the law fails to protect. This legal doctrine almost guarantees that no politician will face any personal liability for their shutdown dictates…
…This COVID shutdown catastrophe should be a permanent black mark against the political class and the experts who sanctified each and every sacrifice.
James Bovard writes that “The state of Missouri has sued the government of China, claiming it is liable for the losses inflicted by the virus that apparently originated in Wuhan, China.” This indicates laziness in my view. There’s been enough research to show that the virus, or more accurately, the sickness (I don’t even believe that there is a covid 19 virus), occurred simultaneously in numerous places and, also, before covid 19 was identified in Wuhan. Remember what John Ioaniddis (who contradicts himself, unfortunately) said about covid 19; ‘If they had not labelled it, then no one would have noticed it’. But labelling it was necessary because what we are dealing with is, as Dr. Sherri Tenpenny says, the biggest hoax in human history. I just want it to roll into Armageddon. Let all the suffering, of the good and the bad, end, I say. As Duff McDonald noted (in connection with other matters mind you): “If it’s got its own name, you probably want to hire the expert on it, don’t you?” – page 146 of “The Firm – The Story Of McKinsey” Enter Moderna et al.
“The Slippery Slope to Despotism: Paved with Lockdowns, Raids and Forced Vaccinations” by John Whitehead (Activist Post)
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
“You have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask, you have no right to open up your business… And if you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”—Alan Dershowitz, Harvard law professor
For years now, the powers-that-be—those politicians and bureaucrats who think like tyrants and act like petty dictators regardless of what party they belong to—have attempted to brainwash us into believing that we have no right to think for ourselves, make decisions about our health, protect our homes and families and businesses, act in our best interests, demand accountability and transparency from government, or generally operate as if we are in control of our own lives…
Just follow the money trail, and you’ll get a sense of what’s in store: more militarized police, more SWAT team raids, more surveillance, more lockdowns, more strong-armed tactics aimed at suppressing dissent and forcing us to comply with the government’s dictates.
It’s chilling to think about, but it’s not surprising.
We’ve been warned.
Remember that Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command? The one that anticipates the future domestic political and social problems the government is grooming its armed forces to solve through the use of martial law?
The chilling five-minute training video, obtained by The Intercept through a FOIA request and made available online, paints a dystopian picture of the future bedeviled by “criminal networks,” “substandard infrastructure,” “religious and ethnic tensions,” “impoverishment, slums,” “open landfills, over-burdened sewers,” a “growing mass of unemployed,” and an urban landscape in which the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment of the have nots.
But here’s the kicker: what they’re really talking about is martial law, packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for the nation’s security.
This COVID-19 crisis is pushing us that much closer to that dystopian vision becoming a present-day reality…
Police have even been called out to shut down churches, schools and public parks and beaches that have been found “in violation” of various lockdown orders.
Now there’s talk of mobilizing the military to deliver forced vaccinations, mass surveillance in order to carry out contact tracing, and heavy fines and jail time for those who dare to venture out without a mask, congregate in worship without the government’s blessing, or re-open their businesses without the government’s say-so.
There are rumblings that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will start thermal screenings to monitor passengers’ temperatures in coming weeks. This is in addition to the virtual strip searches that have become routine aspects of airport security.
Restaurants in parts of the country are being tasked with keeping daily logs of phone numbers, emails, and arrival times for everybody who participates in dine-services, with no mention of how long such records will be kept on file, with whom they will be shared, and under what circumstances.
With the help of Google and Nest cameras, hospitals are morphing into real-time surveillance centers with round-the-clock surveillance cameras monitoring traffic in patients’ rooms.
“What started out as an apparent effort to prevent a novel coronavirus from sickening the nation (and the world) has become yet another means by which world governments (including our own) can expand their powers, abuse their authority, and further oppress their constituents,” writes John Whitehead. Again, This lets the top deciders off the hook. John needs to come to grips with the ‘fact’ of Corporatocracy (rule by corporations, like Moderna, and the rich and powerful). I think that one impediment for Conservatives in regard to that full awareness is their fear of finding that the capitalism they believe in is fascism, and a big problem, and an evil system that has to go. John ignores the fact of who really governs. Also, as I noted in a comment that attached to John’s article on Activist Post, John prevaricates when he repeatedly says, essentially, that America is a police State ‘and’ it’s in danger of becoming a police State. I guess that if we view the US as the center of global capitalism (where it was 1. designed and 2. from where most nation States get their ideas about how societies should be organized and 3. to whom most nation States look, in the words of Sam Gindin and Leo Panitch, for superintendence), it would be hard, if we choose to believe in capitalism, to abandon the United States. It doesn’t seem to matter to those who mouth “God,” that God himself has utterly abandoned the United States. (Good luck trying to find my essay, “Nazi America,” by a straight up search online. It just doesn’t appear. Maybe if I sat on my computer for an hour or so, it would. I don’t know. But it sure isn’t anywhere near the top of the searches. I wish there was a search engine I could trust. There isn’t.)
“Jesus said to him: “No man who has put his hand to a plow and looks at the things behind is well-suited for the Kingdom of God.” – Luke 9:62
“Unmasking the Truth: Studies Show Dehumanizing Masks Weaken You and Don’t Protect You” by Makia Freeman (Global Research)
*edit, May 27, 2020 – I just now had a look at this article on the Freedom Articles website, where I had left a comment. It was disappeared. My comment linked to my compendium in the cloud titled “John and Robert Kennedy Were Terrorists.” Makai Freeman, worships terrorist JFK, it seems. As General Maxwell Taylor said: “I think we should look to Presidet Kennedy as the architect in large measure of the programs and policies of my government and eventually of many other governments directed at facing the challenge of what was originally called subversive insurgency.” – pages 40 & 41 of “War Without End – American Planning for the Next Vietnams” by Michael Klare.
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
It is a commonsense scientific fact that wearing a mask blocks your airways and therefore leads to both hypercapnia (an increase in and accumulation of carbon dioxide in the body from breathing in exhaled air) and hypoxia (a lack of oxygen in the tissues). Symptoms of hypercapnia include dizziness, drowsiness, excessive fatigue, headaches, feeling disoriented, flushing of the skin and shortness of breath. Symptoms of hypoxia include anxiety, restlessness, confusion, changes in the color of skin, cough, rapid breathing, shortness of breath and sweating. Not surprisingly, both conditions are similar, since they are both characterized by a lack of oxygen. In addition, hypoxia has been shown to lead to impaired immunity in general, and to be a forerunner to serious diseases such as atherosclerosis, stroke and heart attack. It is also the necessary precondition for the development of cancer (as I covered in my series on natural cancer cures). Dr. Russell Blaylock highlights how wearing a mask is actually putting you at more risk of infection, because you are lowering your overall health, strength and immunity by under-oxygenation:
“It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries … A more recent study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask. Some had pre-existing headaches that were precipitated by the masks. All felt like the headaches affected their work performance.”
“The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.”
Blaylock also emphasizes how wearing masks is dangerous from a health perspective – it encourages the recycling (rather than the expulsion) of viruses and bacteria, some of which can enter the brain with potentially lethal consequences:
“It gets even more frightening. Newer evidence suggests that in some cases the virus can enter the brain. In most instances it enters the brain by way of the olfactory nerves (smell nerves), which connect directly with the area of the brain dealing with recent memory and memory consolidation. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.”
We are in the middle of a perception war. In perception, often it is emotion not reason which plays a driving role. At the level of the psychopath setting the agenda, the NWO (New World Order) manipulators cleverly exploit this by demanding governments enforce stupid and ineffectual rules like mandatory mask-wearing. At the level of the idiot carrying out the agenda, local and state governmental officials proclaim everyone must wear a mask, so these low-level officials CYA (cover their asses), pacify the population and make it look they are being decisive by taking action. But it’s all a sham, because the masks offer nonprotection…
Mandatory mask-wearing orders are just another way in which NWO conspirators are testing how far they can push people and seeing how much they can get away with.
Makia notes that “This document from the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) openly admits there is little evidence that, if you are well or healthy, wearing a mask will somehow protect you,” but I’m not sure which document he is referring to, although I clicked on one link at the bottom of Makia’s article on Global Research, and had a look around. This is a screen shot taken from a Canadian website titled “Public health measures: Canadian Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: Planning Guidance for the Health Sector”:
It’s of interest to me, as I am Canadian. My boss called me yesterday to tell me that he was delivering masks to my site for the guards there, but that I don’t have to wear one. I certainly won’t be. I work alone overnight in a park/zoo that is closed, not just because it’s night but also because of covid 1984. And I wouldn’t wear one regardless.
The lack of oxygen angle that Makia looks at is, in my view, the most serious aspect of the danger of wearing masks that the experts mentioned in Makia’s article warn us about. The virus in the brain thing is also alarming, but that’s ‘if’ there is a virus that can get into your brain. I’m not absolutely sure that there isn’t. But until someone (Andrew Kaufman maybe?) honestly isolates a virus (according to the rules – Koch’s postulates – of science) so as to prove that there is such a thing, I just can’t say that I believe that they exist. Why would I? And the fact that most of the rest of the world believes something isn’t, for me, sufficient reason to believe something. Something’s either a fact or it isn’t. Period.
I was curious whether Makia is male or female so I investigated. Makia is male (which this figured out from this YouTube video) and is editor of The Freedom Files, which, sadly, pushes Camelot propaganda. There’s a series of articles on the website about JFK, as well as a prominent quote from JFK. I had a (cursory) look at one of the articles, “The Ultimate Reason for the Death of the Greatest US President?,” and left this comment, which may or may not appear there: “Makia Freeman fails spectacularly in promoting Camelot propaganda. Until I can move this to a proper website where I can make it more presentable, the cloud version of my essay on the Kennedy brothers will have to do. Check out “John And Robert Kennedy Were Terrorists”/ https://app.box.com/s/nrb7s56g6qzwi9323nuve1irt8oe4lpc . I am saddened that what I report, on what others report about JFK, is not good news, not be[c]ause bamboozled people don’t want to hear it, but because Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a good man and were he to be confronted with this info, it would disturb and anger him, I’m sure. But it is what it is.”
“As Moderna’s Covid-19 Vaccine Takes The Lead, Its Chief Medical Officer’s Recent Promotion of “Gene-Editing Vaccines” Comes to Light” by Whitney Webb (The Last American Vagabond)
An excerpt from the above linked-to article follows:
More and more frequently, government officials, political pundits and self-appointed “global health experts” like billionaire Bill Gates have been instructing the public that mass gatherings and any semblance of “normalcy” will not return until a vaccine for the novel coronavirus Covid-19 is created and subsequently distributed to the masses. In recent weeks, it has quickly become apparent that the leading Covid-19 vaccine candidate is the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine being developed by Boston-based Moderna Inc….
Major media outlets in multiple countries ran with the headlines trumpeting that Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine “shows promising early results” and has presented “encouraging early signs” because of its purported ability to produce Covid-19 antibodies in humans. In addition, these media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes. They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished as a U.S. government press release noted that the findings in question are merely “interim results.” In addition, the study is being led by the U.S.’ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), itself headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is a key figure in the U.S. government’s coronavirus response…
However, since at least last fall, Moderna has sought to resolve this issue by adding “nanoparticles” to its mRNA vaccine, a modification financed by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Moderna is a “strategic ally” of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation several years prior to the current coronavirus crisis. DARPA’s plans for nanoparticles and nanotechnology and their potentially Orwellian applications were the subject of a recent The Last American Vagabond report…
With Moderna taking a firm lead relative to the other Covid-19 vaccine hopefuls, it is worth taking a closer look at the man who has overseen its development, Moderna’s current Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks. Zaks, an Israeli citizen who began his career at GlaxoSmithKline, oversees “preclinical development, clinical development and regulatory affairs” for Moderna and all of its subsidiaries.
In a 2017 TED Talk, two years after joining Moderna, Zaks spoke at length about how he views mRNA vaccines and their modality, including those he produces at Moderna. In a speech entitled “The disease-eradicating potential of gene editing,” Zaks’ description of Moderna’s mRNA products as, making permanent edits to human genes, clashes with often touted claims that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines “degrade” over time and do not permanently alter human genetics like DNA vaccines.
Beginning his talk, Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies “are actually hacking the software of life and that it’s changing the way we think of and treat disease.” He describes mRNA as “critical information that determines what a cell will actually do” and then states that, if one could “introduce a line of code or change a line of code” in a person’s genome, that has “profound implications for everything.” He then falsely claims that Moderna’s products at the time were proven to “work in people” as the company, prior to Covid-19, was never able to convince the federal government to license its mRNA vaccines for human use due to their lack of effectiveness…
…Given that the stage has already been set for mandatory vaccinations that will be “distributed” throughout the U.S. by the military, now is the time to vigorously raise awareness about the Moderna vaccine’s gravely under-reported ability to “hack the software of life” in ways that could harm public health.
This, what follows, was good. But it was missing one aspect of Bill Gates’s life that I thought was very significant and telling. He did not create the original operating system. Gary Kildall did. How Microsoft came to have it is a sad story, but where Bill Gates is concerned, sadness should be expected. When I first learned this, years ago, I had not been able to sink my teeth into the story. The information presented wasn’t packaged as neatly as in the video I just happened to stumble on when I was wacthing The reallygraceful (YouTube channel by a woman named Grace) video below. From what I do remember about the Gary Kildall story, Coldfusion’s (ColdFusion is the YouTube channel) well put together presentation seems right to me.
There’s always some threat to derail us these days. The counterrevolution, or war against the people, has heated up considerably and shows no signs of cooling off. Frequently now there’s some new challenge or some sort of attack jangling our nerves. Censorship is one of the biggest challenges we face. Google (surprise, surprise) kicked things off in 2016 with the creation of its censorship organization called First Draft. (See my essay titled “A Loud Whoompfing Sound.”) When we can’t communicate, then they’ll be free, as in very free, to continue enslaving people as we see them doing right now before our eyes via covid 1984.*edit, May 27 – I almost re-used the above two videos in the post I’m working on right now, mis-remembering and thinking that I was going to but accidentally deleted that draft I was working on, but that draft was for the post following this one. Anyway, In the course of preparing the post I’m working on now, and reviewing these videos, I came across an interesting comment attached to the ColdFusion video that I’ll share with you. If that commenter is legit, then his complaint about the video I’m showing here should be kept in mind. I await the book that looks at all of this in detail. It will be a good read. People need to have a really good look at Bill Gates (and the superclass that he belongs to). The comment by Big Texun Tex follows:
“But the story of Gary out flying the plane when IBM visited isn’t actually what happened. 90% of the work Gary did at the time was for IBM. He met with IBM dozens of times, and sold them dozens of operating systems and other software. IBM was Gary’s main customer. While it is possible that Gary missed a meeting, why would missing one meeting out of literally thousands he didn’t miss doesn’t make such a difference? He met with IBM constantly in those years, and he had people on staff who’s job it was to manage that. The OS for the PC was not the only business he had with IBM at the time, far from it. And you missed the whole PC AT story.”
What does “PC AT” mean? I have no idea. End of edit.
I consider WordPress’s announcement that it’s going to alter, for everyone, the editor for its platform (WordPress.com) to be a threat. (They’ve been butchering WordPress and it’s editting feature for a while. I only escaped the knife by employing scripts provided by a helpful WordPress user name tPenguin. With her scripts, I’ve been able to retain the easy to use, but robust ‘classic’ editor I was first introduced to when I signed up with WordPress ten years ago.) I don’t greet the announcement with any sort of pleasure. Remember, This is a company that announced a partnership with Google some time back. (When I complained about that, my complaint, polite and brief, was labelled a “rant” and deleted.) Ever since then, I’ve been trepidant. I don’t have the smarts to do my own blog, designing and hosting it. And I get zero help from anyone. And I can’t throw money at the problem and hire expertise. Ergo. If I disappear soon, it could be because of this announced change, depending on what it means. Or my blog could just go the way of Jon Rappoport’s WordPress blog, namely ‘away’, since, like Jon, I don’t trade in establishment bullcrap. Ironically, my low visibility is probably a safeguard, although with covid 1984, I am growing at more than twice the rate I’ve grown in the previous 10 years I’ve blogged. (In over two years on Bitchute, my most viewed video, which is on Venezuela [a video by Mike Pryzner], had been viewed just over 400 times. When I posted a video [combined excerpts presenting Dr Anrew Kaufman and Whitney Webb] 2 days ago, looking at the gene gun that Moderna is planning to fire at everyone, I garned well over 1,000 hits before two days were over! I’m sort of glad that that was on Bitchute and not WordPress.) Still, Mine is no celebrity-status blog. Here’s a screenshot of the message I just now received when I was attempting to look at my stats: