What follows is from the above linked-to UK Column News show. The presenters in this show are Patrick Henningsen and Mike Robinson.Boris Johnson talks to his boss Bill Gates about vaccines. Sitting in on the conversation is Kate Bingham, chair of the UK’s Vaccine Taskforce. All expressed a hope that a vaccine for covid 19 would be found soon, while expressing support for Gavi. The US has given UK-based AstraZeneka (the Oxford Vaccine Group) 1 $billion. Patrick notes that Big Pharma is doing great in covid 1984 (with taxpayers paying for their own abuse and impoverishment). After the (ongoing) war on terror was launched, similar to now a lot of money and grants went to universities for department of Homeland Security-type applications (surveillance, data mining, and counterrevolution projects). This is State capitalism folks. There’s no free market. No competition. Governments favor and protect bosses and police the people so that they never get in the way of mafia capitalists. It’s socialism for the rich.
Patrick highlights one country where there’s pushback against manadatory vaccines. A third of Romanians will not take Bill Gates’s mandatory vaccine. Patrick has talked to people in various Balkan States and people are becoming increasingly leery of the authorities ‘leading’ them through the covid 19 crisis.Brian notes that Gavin Williamson, Secretary of State for Education in the UK, suggested (testing the public’s reaction no doubt) – and I didn’t understand what Brian was saying here – that they needed a requirement to demonstrate vaccination in children to get access to schools. Whatever that was, it was terrifying and obscene.
“And I saw three unclean inspired expressions that looked like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the wild beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet. They are, in fact, expressions inspired by demons and they perform signs, and they go out to the kings of the entire inhabited earth, to gather them together to the war of the great day of God the Almighty.” – Revelation 16:13,14
The presenters look at a Spectator article by Ross Clark (“Standord study suggests coronavirus might not be as deadly as flu”). 12 different locations were looked at for serological studies looking for information on the infection rate. The main researcher here is John Ioannidis, who noted that if we hadn’t named the virus, then we wouldn’t have noticed anything unusual this year. Between .02. percent and 4 percent infection fatality rates (IFR) were seen, which were so far from the scammy predictions of orgs like WHO and Imperial College it isn’t funny. But there’s Trump, running with the scary numbers. Of course, they attacked Ioannidis’s findings. In some cases, they are seeing IFRs that are ‘lower’ than those for seasonal flu. So why are the lockdown measures still there? (Of course, we know.)
Boris Johnson has presided over the destruction of the Uk economy. (See below.) He is part of the club of destroyers after all. And his goverment has the temerity to lecture Venezuela about democracy.
The Bank of England chief, Andrew Bailey, after saying that the Bank of England would not consider negative interest rates, has decided to consider negative interest rates. Patrick notes that they went for the worst case scenarios. Brian suggests that Boris has backed himself to a corner and should just resign. I wouldn’t characterize things that way. As an in-the-know participant in the covid 19 pandemic hoax, Boris is simply playing his role. For me, whether he pays a political price not is moot. He ‘will’ pay a price. Patrick thinks that the politicians have deflected some of the backlash from the public onto the scientists who they said they were listening to. Perhaps. They all have their evil roles to play. Brian makes the point, similar to one made by Whitney Webb, that the same disastrous policies and measures unfolding right now under the excuse of covid 19 were what were proposed previously as a response to climate change. They’ve been itching to unfurl what some of us are calling covid 1984 (4th industrial revolution, namely the high tech/surveillance and social credit society desired by the tech giants, the top tier investors and the Corporatocracy Police State). Naomi Klein warned (before she went over to the dark side) that this was coming. See her 2008 article about the Beijing Olympics titled “China’s All-Seeing Eye.”Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter, has given money to an organization called Humanity Forward (Humanity Forward Coronavirus Relief Fund), created by Andrew Yang, whose big deal is all about a uniserval basic income. (There are two types of universal basic income, which has different labels. There’s the rightwing version, which is Yang’s preference of course, and the leftwing version, which doesn’t involve giving ‘and’ taking. I was going to link to something by OCAP’s John Clarke, but I see that that group has drank the covid 19 pandemic Kool-Aid and I’m just not inclined to bother with them beyond this mention.) Just great Jack (the ripper?). Kick the poor when they’re down. Your class will honor you. God, not so much.
What has corporate media been up to?, asks Brian. He notes that they deserve special criticism just now because they are taking so much money from government (taxpayers) in return for lying to the public about covid 19. Brian looks at the Audit Bureau of Circulation (abc) website and notes that they are beginning to hide stats, something that will conduce to a lack of competition and a corresponding cartelization of the industry. And that would be honest, since major media is already, essentially, a network of government, or police State, propaganda organs.The presenters then look at the scary behavior of UK teachers who are demanding that the government not send kids back to schools and put them (teachers and kids) at risk. Oookay. I pity the poor parents whose chidlren are being left in the care of those uncaring, monstrous teachers. Caring is knowing and those teachers don’t care and they either don’t know, or they do, but they are willing to help those who own, rule and ruin the world to foist covid 1984 on us. Just make sure you roll up your sleeves, teachers, and teachers’ union reps, for your gene therapy when the police State comes knocking on you door. You losers! Meanwhile, Something like 22 European countries are sending their kids back to school. Sweden’s schools for younger kins were never closed and they’ve done just fine. Patrick notes, sarcastically, that the rules that apply to Sweden in terms of physics and science don’t seem to apply to the UK and the US. The authorities – professionals – in charge of the UK are united in their evil. Peter English, chair of the Public Health Medecine Committee of the British Medical Association, sent a letter of support to the awful teachers who are begging the government to do the wrong thing. (Patrick notes that the BMA backpeddled a little, later.) The presenters note that English’s letter is full of lies. See my previous blog post for an interesting discussion of what it means (for too many) to be a ‘professional’ within the American-led gangster Corporatocracy. The presenters then look at some information on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (“COVID – 19: Have we forgotten our children in all this?”) website. Here’s a screen shot that the presenters show:
Patrick thinks that institutions connected to the government are doubling down on their nonsense, whereas experts in more indedpendent institutions tend to report honestly.
The presenters look at some supposedly new information coming out of France that indicates that the covid 19 virus actually began before it was ‘identified’ in Whuhan, China. (As Patrick notes, the findings of those making that claim, are inconclusive.) Early on in my reporting (when I was a believer in the existence of viruses), I came across Larry Romanoff’s Global Research article showing evidence that the virus had been seeded in multiple countries, simultaneously, prior to Wuhan. That article, which, for some reason, has been removed from the Global Research website, is titled ” “COVID-19: Targeting Italy and South Korea? “The Chain of Transmission of Infection.”
The presenters note that loser Trump is wearing a mask after having said that he wouldn’t. He just does what he’s told, ergo. The presenters note that there’s a great deal of debate about whether masks for everyone are a good idea. Apparently, from my reading around, they most certainly aren’t. But the fools who need convincing prefer to be told by their television what is good for them and there’s nothing that we can do about that. Del Bigtree addresses this in his dressing down of ‘star’ Matthew McConaughey:
I have now read a number of articles explaining that masks, for regular people who are healthy, are a bad idea. And that includes a government of Canada website. Del Bigtree, in the above Highwire segment, displays an article by Dr Russell Blaylock that talks about face masks. Here’s an excerpt from his article titled “Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy”:
o| oo| ooo|
As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”1 Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission…
Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention, are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.
|o |oo |ooo
The presenters turn again to insane pro lockdown propganda. They examine an Atlantic magazine article titled “Georgia’s Experiment in Human Sacrifice” by Amanda Mull. (While I was on this site the first time I visited for this blog post, which was accidentally deleted, without even looking around I saw other evil reportage similar to Amanda’s. Those people are ruined.) Patrick can’t believe the headline of Amanda’s article. Brian says “Is it any wonder the mainstream media is collapsing in a heap?” If only the police States weren’t there to prop them up. The subtitle for Amanda’s propaganda piece is: “The state is about to find out how many people need to lose their lives to shore up the economy.” Maybe. But we already know about the states in the US that didn’t do lockdown, which people won’t hear much about from corporate media. I don’t recall exactly which states they were, but I think that they were midwest states like Wisconsin. They did just fine. But that can’t be noted in a propaganda piece like Mull’s. As Patrick notes, losers like Amanda are making the argument that we either protect the economy or else we protect lives, but, looking at that fact and applying that measure, Amanada’s argument makes zero sense, since it’s the lockdown that is doing all the harm and killing people. This is a good time to remind readers of Kit Knightly’s Off Guardian article titled “Opposing lockdown is NOT “profits before people”.” Here’s a quote from that:
“The lockdown has been “eased”. Apparently. Some people should go back to work, schools might be opening a bit. You can see one person at a time. You’d be forgiven for not noticing any tangible difference. You’d be more forgiven for thinking it’s a contrived mess designed to confuse and distract people…
“Essentially: We are very much still under lockdown, and likely to be so for the foreseeable future. And it is still, very much, a destructive policy which will ruin many more lives than the virus.
“Nevertheless, the usual “liberal” media suspects are up in arms about Boris “putting profits before people”. And, as per usual these days, even alt-media types (who should know better) are buying that line. So is Jeremy Corbyn.
“In what is perhaps the greatest example of gaslighting in human history, we have “champions of the working class” arguing for mass unemployment, the shutting down of small businesses and the self-employed, and draconian police powers…
“The idea that destroying the economy will only harm the rich, while somehow contriving to liberate the masses, is perhaps the most ridiculous lie of all the lies used to prop up the covid19 rollout…
“Billionaires love a crisis. There are fortunes to be made on put-options and derivatives; buying cheap stock in failing companies; snatching up foreclosed properties for pennies on the dollar; stagnating wages means paying your employees nothing while your profits soar. And debt. Mountains of debt. Private, and corporate, which gives you leverage for years – even decades…
“When society is stopped on a dime, when people are deprived of their livelihoods, when the sick and vulnerable are denied human contact and forced to sign documents declaring their lives meaningless, and when the health service stops servicing people’s health…that is the opposite of saving lives. That’s killing people.
“The. Lockdown. Is. Killing. People.
“Unemployment. Debt. Stress. Bankruptcy. These are not just “economic considerations”, they are life or death. The lockdown is bringing largescale poverty with it.
“Poverty kills people. Millions of them every year.”
Patrick asks where the pro lockdown propaganda, from abusers and the abused, leads to, and directs us to a 21st Century Wire article titled “Washington State: Residents Who Refuse COVID Test to Be Placed Under House Arrest.”
Washington State’s governor Jay Inslee threatening his state’s citizens, telling them that if they don’t permit authorities to test them then they’ll be confined to their homes, with a minder who watches them. As the 21st Century Wire article notes, “This unprecedented level of medical surveillance and authoritarianism raises the specter of whether the State will use these very same draconian measures to force its citizens to accept a mandated vaccine for COVID-19.” Additionally, the article looks at Jay Inslee’s track record (awful) and conflicts of interest, quoting from the always quotable Jon Rappoport. Consider:
“The first thing to know about Governor Jay Inslee: under President Bill Clinton, he served as a regional director for the US Dept. of Health and Human Services. HHS is in charge of the CDC. Inslee is, therefore, actually a PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIAL. That means, as governor of WA, he’s already on the team of Fauci and Birx clones who have staged state coups and are usurping and destroying human rights, including the right to make a living. When Inslee ran for a seat in the US Congress, in 2009-10, among his largest campaign donors were pharma companies. Then there is Inslee’s connection to Bill Gates, the dark prince of lockdowns, the man who wants to keep the global population in chains until his COVID vaccine arrives. A clinical trial of a COVID vaccine has begun in Seattle.
“This March, Inslee signed a bill into law, giving Gates’ pet project, charter schools, state-aid money. Apparently, Bill himself is short on cash. Dr. Mary Alice Heuschel, a Gates Foundation deputy director, was formerly chief of staff for Inslee. During his election campaigns covering 2011-12, Inslee’s top donor was Microsoft (employees and families).”
The 21st Century Wire article ends with a sombre note, asking “If state governors are no longer independent and taking instructions from federal health officials and NGOs like the Gates Foundation, while seizing unprecedented dictatorial powers over their citizenry, then where can the electorate go for redress of grievances?” In a fake democracy, you don’t possess options.
Patrick shows a diagram, above, that the 21st Century Wire shows. He notes how the whole idea of mass testing and contact tracing is useless, bogus and awful. It’s police State surveillance whose purpose isn’t to deal with a virus but to condition people for the future that elites have planned for them.
There’s the issue of masks, which we’ve looked at. And there’s the issue of surfaces, which the presenters now look at. Patrick notes how the idea of getting sick from touching a surface with covid 19 (which no one’s proven exists) was hyped up when the pandemic was declared. He notes that it drove the (anti-social, harmful) social distancing practice. My first blog post about covid 19 reports on my experience in one of my favorite coffee shops (which I’ll never visit again) just as this craziness was starting. The lockdown hadn’t yet become extreme but it was starting. I was so disappointed to see that my friends had completely swallowed the covid 19 pandemic Kool-Aid. The thing that they were freaking out about most was the reported idea that covid 19 could stay on surfaces for x number of hours. They were even telling me how many hours the virus could stay on this type of surface and that type of surface. (See “Corporate Media: A Terrifying Addiction.” Using my blog’s search engine to retrieve that blog post was a bust. WordPress’s partnership with Google will prove to be a bad thing for WP users. Of that, I have no doubt.) It was frightening to see how people could be turned on and off by their frikken television sets! I knew then that tv was largely big pharma-funded (and wouldn’t even have to be in order to be willing to push covid 1984, for it’s “corporate” media) and when I pointed that out to my friends, they didn’t even blink. I gave them my opinion of how trustworthy the government was and one of the co-owners lamely responded with ‘but in this case I believe them’. Why? I’ll tell you why. Fear. They didn’t want to go against the bully (the lawless, violent State) and the crowd who will follow it. I would never have thought that those people were like that, but I did see small signs. They are great people. Well, It’s relative, Isn’t it? A lot of great people have proven to be a part of the very serious problem in relation to covid 1984.
In his article titled “No, coronavirus is not a good argument for quitting cash”, Mike Orcutt (MIT Technology Review) notes that:
But it’s not enough for the germ to survive on an inanimate surface. For virus particles on a dollar bill to infect a human, they must follow the “primary route of infection,” says Joseph Eisenberg, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Michigan. For Covid-19, it appears that people become infected by inhaling particles someone else has coughed or sneezed into the air, or by contacting a virus particle with their hand and then touching their eyes, nose, or mouth. What we don’t know, says Eisenberg, is how capable this virus is of being transmitted to humans from inanimate surfaces of any kind.
Says the US Centers for Disease Control: “It may be possible that a person can get Covid-19 by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it and then touching their own mouth, nose, or possibly their eyes, but this is not thought to be the main way the virus spreads.”
But that message hasn’t quelled fears of “virus-tainted” dollars, perhaps spurred in part by the central banks’ quarantines. According to Bloomberg, the Fed has resisted calls from industry groups to issue a statement assuring Americans that the risk of using cash is minimal.
In fact, we don’t have any evidence that money in any form has ever been a source of any kind of infection, says Marilyn Roberts, a microbiologist at the University of Washington School of Public Health.
Patrick notes that the CDC is now saying that they are not sure that covid 19 on surfaces is something to fear. However, They – those who own, rule and ruin the world – have their agendas and they will not be stopped (certainly not by the outgunned people) and one of those (interrelated) agendas is digital cash (for control of people). That’s why you see headlines such as the one on this Telegraph article titled “Dirty banknotes may be spreading the coronavirus, WHO suggests.” The presenters then show a slide featuring a WEBMD doctor:
I had a look around on WEBMD and found it to be establishment. It’s not a source that I would look to for information, regardless the reasonable view they take of the subject of covid 19 on surfaces.
Brian then brings up the case of arrested Doctor, David Noakes, who received a secret trial because the State had nothing to fear from the public getting a good look at the issues. (This seemed to have nothing to do with covid 1984.)Brian next looks at the case of Tobias Ellwood who was connected with 77th Brigade and Rapid Response (propaganda and dirty tricks) and still seems to be while he’s also chairing the Defense Select Committee. On that Committee, he is supposed to hold to account the British military and 77th Brigade. (When organizations watchdog themselves, then the watchdogging isn’t watchdogging.) UKC was contacted by someone close to senior military who reported that senior military were also concerned about Ellwood. The whole fact-checking regime is corrupt, Patrick notes. The presenters report that the UK media is attacking Nigel Farage for ignoring the (unwarranted, insane) lockdown to do the job of reporting that corporate media no longer does. Nigel was filming French naval vessels as they escorted immigrants on dinghies into English waters for a hand-off. The ironically-named Independent carried an article by Lizzy Buchan titled “Nigel Farage condemned for boat trip into English Channel to report migrant ‘invasion’.” Spend a minute perusing the Independent, as I just did, and you’ll want to have your brain removed from your skull and burned to ashes.
Brian reports on the US threats toward Iran (on top of threats) whose oil tankers are headed to Venezuela. I noticed just now when I was on the awful Independent website that at least one made it okay. “Iranian tanker DOCKS at Venezuelan port after braving stormy waters to deliver 1st fuel shipment despite US blockade” is the title of this unsigned (as usual on RT News, which I’m not a fan of at all) RT article.
The last bit of news that the UKC reports here is about a foul individual named James Roscoe. While the UK government is waging a war of terror on its own people, at the behest of sicko Bill Gates and his superclass, Roscoe, the Acting Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, babbles something (a few days previoius to the airing of this UKC show) about guiding Venezuela into democracy, which means into the global dictatorship of the United States, which the UK government is totally down with. Brian is appalled at the hypocrisy.